• JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nope. Your shit needs to be called out just like the others. Blocking anti-democracy lemmy users is exactly what you all want as has been discussed in another thread. It allows you to spread your rhetoric loud and clear with zero opposition.

      • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        So you’re actually admitting to purposefully agitating people? That’s respectably bold.

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          actually admitting to purposefully agitating people

          Lol, bud, i’ve been screaming that I am. Literally every conversation i have with mozz ends up debating the merits of political agitation.

          I don’t blame you for not seeing that if you’ve blocked me, though I’ve been told blocking doesn’t actually hide activity, so maybe you should have seen it? Either way, I think it’s funny that admitting to agitation is ‘bold’ to you, since agitation is the basis for all protest in the history of the US.

          • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Oh as I said, I don’t block propagandists. They need to be called out. So I’m not sure why you still feel the need to suggest that I have.

            And it’s bold to admit to agitating people as here it’s essentially considered trolling. To purposefully anger people- especially when you also admit that what you’re doing is shitposting….

            People are banned for far less.

            But you’re free to call what you’re doing whatever you would like- it won’t change the fact that you essentially just admitted to trolling people.