• NotAnArdvark@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 months ago

    Threads for Fairphone often fill up with “it’s not going to work if they don’t X.” Lots of people don’t seem to understand that their personal viewpoint can be quite different from other’s.

    There are people who are aware of the trade-offs of a Fairphone, but still choose to get one.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve always been in favour of a phone with a shitty camera. I don’t give a fuck about posting on social media, and these days a huge chunk of a phone’s price is determined by how powerful of a camera they were able to cram into it.

      I recognize that this apparently sounds insane to most people.

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t post on social media either, but my phone have replaced the compact camera that I used to pack for family vacations.

        I suspect that’s what most people use their phone camera phone: to take personal photos that will only be shared with family members.

  • Recant@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I really wish it had a 3.5mm audio jack. I don’t see what companies stand to earn, other than money, when they remove the headphone jack.

    I can see why Apple and Samsung removed it because the they can market their own wireless headphones.

    Removing the jack only removes capability, it is not like older phones didn’t have the capability to connect to Bluetooth headphones

  • Square Singer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Interesting how they went for an IoT SoC (Qualcomm QCM 6490), instead for an SoC that’s actually meant for usage in phones.

    They probably did this to be able to get longer Android updates. As a side effect, that means it natively supports desktop Ubuntu and Windows 11 IoT Enterprise.

    On the other hand, this is pretty much the only phone using this SoC. (There are three models by a totally unknown brand from India that use the same SoC.)

    It’s going to be interesting to see whether that’s an advantage or a disadvantage.

  • TurboTurbo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 months ago

    I was exited for this phone, but as I said in another thread: I am a bit disappoited about the CPU and the substantial price hike, but most of all aqout the size increase. Is there any market research at all indicating that customers want 6"+ displays?

    • Irina@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      10 months ago

      Is there any market research at all indicating that customers want 6"+ displays?

      Unfortunately, yes. People who buy smaller phones are the people who buy a new phone less often, and small phones tend to sell worse than the big models (see S10e, iPhone 12(?) Mini) so don’t get renewed. Would be nice if they did.

      • NiklzNDimz@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s so frustrating that this is true. I use devices until they’re dead or at risk of serious compromise before getting another, but the only options are ones that I can’t even hold comfortably with one hand. I’m seriously considering the Jelly 2 at this point.

      • DJDarren@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I picked up a 13 Mini back in March, and will ride this bad boy for as long as I can, in the hope that Apple eventually release another Mini model.

        So perhaps it’s true that we hold onto our little phones for longer, primarily because we’re waiting for another little phone to come along.

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      The CPU choice is great, why are you disappointed with it? It’s the reason they can offer a minimum of 8 years of support on this model.

        • Ilandar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Unfortunately I think a lot of people just have zero understanding of how the smartphone industry works. They think small manufacturers like Fairphone just have free reign to get whatever parts they want, offer updates for however long they want, etc.

          The reality is that Fairphone have to find a way to work within the system that has been created by big tech. That means selecting parts based on their suitability for the long-term support goals they have. It’s one of the reasons why the specs are mid-range, because these parts stay in circulation for longer. For example, the 4 had a very generic 60 Hz IPS notch display because it was a widely used panel within the industry at the time. Now that higher refresh rate OLEDs have become more common on mid-range devices, Fairphone has been able to put one into the 5.

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You have a Qualcomm QCM 6490? Google told me, there is basically no phone out there that uses it, because it’s an IoT SoC, not one made for phones.

    • Square Singer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      With you on almost all points. Only the size didn’t actually increase. The phone’s dimensions are exactly the same. Only the weight went up a bit. The screen size was increased by using up more of the phone’s front side.

      The phone is still a massive brick.

    • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I get that they wanted to increase the battery and put out a new cpu, but I’m disappointed they’re not offering any camera or screen upgrades for my Fairphone 4.

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Were you actually expecting that? No manufacturer has ever created an upgradeable smartphone, let alone one as small as Fairphone. The Phonebloks concept died ages ago.

        The situation with the camera on the Fairphone 3 was unique and mainly in response to problems with the original module. It shouldn’t be taken as evidence that they have the ability to do this with every edition of the Fairphone, or extend upgrades to other areas like the display.

  • Safeguard@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I pre-ordered already.

    Ok, so honesty time: The fact that this company is good for the environment, pays people well, etc… is NOT my main “thing” for wanting to own this phone.

    It’s the fact that it is open. I can unlock and flash whatever I want, I can fix things by ordering replacement parts, a new screen is TOTALLY do-able both price wise and doing it myself.

    Also it does not come with bloat, or vendor-lock in software like on ALL samsung shitty phones.

    Out of all the phones, this one makes the most sense.

    (And my current FP4 goes to my mother, perfect for her and many more years of support)

      • ripcord@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        What are you currently running? Just curious what non-android and non-ios is working well for you.

    • 1984@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I see Google Drive, Gmail, Google Messages on screenshots so it does come with bloatware.

      • Oinks@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        While unfortunate, not shipping these standard Google apps is not really an option for any Android manufacturer due to Google requirements. Including them is required if you want to use anything from the GSM, which includes things like the Play Store and everything it touches. You can technically ship a different Android distribution like Lineage or /e/, but that’s not really what most people will be expecting of an “Android” phone and will narrow the viable target demographic even more than the value proposition already does.

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I know what you mean, but because you’ve allowed yourself to miss my point completely - I’ll do the same.

        No, it is not, in fact, better. Nothing would be better, because we would not have a false impression of the situation.

  • Reil@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Their website doesn’t seem to specify which GSM bands it has (simply “More Bands and Band-Combinations for better reception”). I want to know how much of a given provider’s spectrum I’d be missing out on trying to sneak one of these to the states.

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      They are offering a minimum of 8 years of software support. 5 years is the warranty. I’m not sure why OP wrote that, it’s not what was announced.

      • lol3droflxp@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago
        1. It’s 8 apparently
        2. 5 years is as long as most phones that I used last so there would be no point to buy it
          • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Fair wages for the people making the phone is also a selling point of this phone. It’s not just about repairability.

            That said I’m also not writing this from a Fairphone, because the price is too high for me.

          • Square Singer@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            The high price actually cancels the point of the repairability. I can get a similar phone for easily €400-500 less. If I budget that extra price for repairs, I can get the battery and screen replaced quite a few times.

            I say that as an FP4 owner, who did the same calculation mistake there.

        • gelberhut@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          According to Fairphone “We plan at least 5 Android OS version updates after Android 13”.

      • gelberhut@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Samsung offers 4 years of os updates for many phones and watches. And news reported that pixel 8 will have better.

        If I recall correctly, Xiaomi recently declared the same for some of their phones.

        • ripcord@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          4 years including security updates though right? If that’s the flcase then fairphone’s doing 8 years.

          • gelberhut@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            No really. Samsung offers 4 years of os updates and 5 years of security updates. Samsung releases os updates really fast, so 5 years basically means 5 os versions.

            Fairhone declares 5 os versions and 8 years of software support. Fairphone users here mentioned that fairphone is very slow with updates, so it could happen that 5 os versions really will take 8 years. If Fairphone will keep same cadence as Samsung, its 5 os versions can be coverted into 5 years.

            But we have a bit of apples vs oranges here.

            I personally find samsung’s policy good enough for majority of users. I expect that I will upgrade my phone every 3 - 5 years for different unpredictable today reasons anyway.

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          There’s a clear trajectory where this is heading. From 2027 the EU will enforce replaceable batteries and it looks like some other markets might follow. Software support duration is increasing a lot as well.

          I wouldn’t be surprised if you’d get most of the Fairphone’s benefits on a regular Samsung in a few years.

          • gelberhut@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yes, very realistic scenario. TBF, I cannot remember if I ever upgraded a phone due to the battery issuses.

            So, for me personally, replaceable battery is not a significant benefit.

      • M_Djallo@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Actually in the past they updated their software even past the support from qualcomm, rewriting by themselves what was needed to allow and old chipset to run newer android version

        Source

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, well, they are just doing what custom ROM makers have been doing for a decade and a half.

          My old Droid 4 was also EOL after Android 4.1. Custom ROM makers pushed this up to Android 7.1 by ignoring the parts (e.g. the Kernel) that they couldn’t update.

        • Uranium3006@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The price is also higher because they use fair trade gold and whatnot. Given the mission to clean up the electronics industry it’s plesently suprising it doesn’t cost more

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is going to be my next phone. I cant wait to get out of the mainstream phone market. I barely use my phone for anything but browsing the web so it shouldbe fine.

  • TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    If it a) comes to the US, and b) comes with stock Android out of the box, I might get it for my next phone. Currently leaning toward a Pixel with Graphene.

  • nlm@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Looks pretty nice tbh! Probably going to stick to my current phone a few more years until it stops being updated but if I manage to break it this might just be the replacement.

    • timkenhan@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Also:

      • lack of 3.5mm jack
      • EVEN BIGGER size

      At this point, they’re just following the trend.