Need this nationwide. I hate having fees added on to the price of what I’m ordering.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I do, but I also live in Bible Belt eagle fuckin rural America. Most of the people in my “city” live for every bad idea you can muster -

        Like how practically half of this city exists explicitly on the far side of the city line, so they can dodge taxes while using the city’s infrastructure to get around (and then bitch about the state of the city’s infrastructure cause of course they do.)

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    One step closer to the fucking common sense of the rest of the world where the price you see for something is the price you actually pay. Nobody cares about a number that’s mathematically related to the price they have to pay, just tell me.

  • Kid_Thunder@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The restaurant owner arguments are all super weak as usual.

    “Menu prices will rise!”

    No shit, but everyone was already paying the prices but now you can’t just surprise patrons with the increase.

    “There will be pullback. People will lose jobs and hours!”

    Doubtful but even if true, that means that they knew they were lying to customers and clawing extra charges that they wouldn’t know about already.

    “‘They’ are thinking restaurants will absorb the costs”

    Not exactly but they will have to compete with pricing as it should be.

    They’re just trying to get away with playing the same game Telcos have gotten away with for far too many decades.

    • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s what pisses me off, if the consumer knows what they’ll actually have to pay they won’t buy.

      They are arguing that they should be able to lie to the consumer and trick them. They think the consumer shouldn’t be informed to make a decision on what is right for them. And once again, they are putting the business before the customer.

          • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            From the same source, further down

            The existence of bait and switch schemes may also be evidenced by the following factors: whether in fact there were a significant number of sales of the advertised product at the advertised price;

            Adding on hidden taxes and fees is debatably not providing the advertised price. Maybe? I don’t know.

    • experbia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Menu prices will rise!”

      nothing a bunch of two-bit con artists MBAs hate more than an informed mark customer.

      The actual good businesses run by good people will not suffer by this. only those that relied on duping their customers.

    • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      What are the service charges that are being put on after the fact? From this I’m assuming it’s separate from the customary tip and any sales tax.

      • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Many restaurants have started adding a “service charge” that is not a tip in addition to menu prices. It’s super fucking shady. There is rarely an signage indicating the charge, relying of the hostesses to inform you. It isn’t always clear on the itemized bill they hand you, since it’s grouped down with the tax. It’s not the standard gratuity added for large groups. There is a restaurant near me that suddenly started adding this kind of charge. They did not notify me when I sat down and I didn’t see any indication of it on the itemized bill and only noticed when calculating the tip, after they’d run my card. I made a huge stink about it because it’s a fucking scam and they did discount my bill, but they refused to remove the service charge. I liked their food, but that was the last time I visited and I stopped recommending them.

      • Kid_Thunder@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think what really kicked this off is that restaurants started putting surcharges on bills by directly passes specific legal requirement costs directly to the customers without increasing their menu prices. For example, now that servers get some health benefits in SF, they’ll have a surcharge that says something like “SF Mandate” or “SF Health Surcharge”.

        This would also cover stuff like to go order surcharges where some places are charging more for takeout sort of like Doordash or Grubhub do, except of course, you’re picking it up yourself.

        I do wonder how/if places with some more traditional surcharges are going to comply now. For example pizza places charging delivery fees.

        Places will still be able to get away with “X% gratuity added to bill for Y seats (though I’ve seen some places do it for any number of people, including 1)” because that’s optional, even if they put it on your bill because you’ve always been able to make them remove it.

        It is like on most people’s cell phone bills in the US. You’ll see stuff like “FCC surcharge” which is the company passing their FCC regulatory fees directly to the customer without changing their advertised prices for a plan, E911 fees for 911 services, various taxes levied on the company but not the consumer are also passed to the customer.

        The purpose is to have restaurants take these fees/taxes/whatever and make them build those costs of doing business directly into their advertised pricing on their menus. Companies don’t like this because they can advertise cheaper prices and psychologically the customer doesn’t usually think or even know about the extra surcharges, companies can set those surprise charges to whatever they want (they aren’t regulated) and they do not have to really compete with those prices wherever they advertise (menus, flyers, etc.) thus driving them down for the consumer.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Fees are predatory on people who are swayed by lower advertised cost. Basically, they are extorting the way many people’s brains work. It’s just another way to keep the not rich from ever catching up. Not just in dollars, but time. If you try to price compare, you have to sink a ton of time into uncovering all the fees. The rich just don’t have to worry about that. So it ends up as a time tax.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s called a Bait and Switch and is a form of Fraud.

      It’s just that in the US, the grey area between Fraud and “Sharp business practice” is legally way broader than the rest of the Developed World.

      Kudos to California to have forces some clarification on at least this one form of misrepresentation/false-advertising/fraud.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I agree that these fees are bad and I hate them, but couldn’t you make the opposite argument that they serve as a (money) tax on the rich? Poor people will take the time to shop around for the best deal, whereas rich people will simply pay whatever for the product they want. Therefore hidden fees disproportionately are paid by the rich.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        No, it’s always taking advantage of the ignorant or the hurried, regardless whether they can afford it. I shouldn’t require extra steps to avoid being ripped off

      • zbyte64@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It is bad if you think a person’s value of their own time isn’t reduced to market dynamics. Yes the rich pay a cost/tax for the convenience, but that is because their time is valued more by the market. Poor people are compensated less for their time and that seems to make it “okay” to ask poor people to spend more time to deal with less honest business practices. If you think their free time is as “valuable” as anyone else’s then this is offensive.

  • I realize when I go out for a special event, like I did Friday night to see Harry Connick, Jr. play with the Boston Pops at Symphony Hall that I wasn’t going to quibble about costs.

    However, after the non-optional 18% “gratuity”, they also had an additional “server” tip field. Ha, GFY, bitches!

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Minnesota is currently working on a similar law to stop surcharges and just have a final price.

  • badbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah, Cali can shut its mouth. Tourists, look at your resort bill or hotel bill next time you pay. See if everything was baked into advertised price.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah… Maybe it should be that way for resorts or hotels too??

      Lol, what a weird take

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, that’s the reasonable take.

          Badbytes was siggesting that because hotels do this, restaurants should be allowed to do this.

          • badbytes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Nah, it pisses me off when I travel to California for vacation. I was being sarcastic. Sorry for being confusing. :)

            • Reyali@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Every hotel I’ve stayed in—regardless of state—has had this problem.

              And if you read the first two paragraphs of the article, you’ll see the law actually applies to hotels as well; the article just chooses to focus on the restaurant part. So maybe your state-directed ire is misplaced.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    4oz smashed patty $17

    Add bun $1

    Add cheese $2-$4

    Add $1: lettuce, tomato, onion

    Add $3: grilled onion, any sauce

    Add $7: sauteed onionz melted cheese, sauce +bechamel, fried egg, kimchi

    Add $17: salmon

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    On the tipping subject… it is just another way the well off designed long ago, to reinforce that the working class worked for them. Originally it was the business owner that they were targeting, to make sure they stayed dependent on the good graces of the elite. After all, back then most businesses were mom and pop shops. Now it is just out of controll, and used to increase profit margins as well as extract more cash from people who have trouble realizing the full cost.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    “If it’s in the core price of the menu, there will be a pullback” in patrons’ spending, she told NPR shortly before the attorney general released the guidelines. "There are some people, I think, that are hoping that the restaurants will just absorb that cost, because we’ve seen people say, ‘Oh, it’s too expensive with the service charge.’ "

    If you add bullshit charges that are not added into the price on the menu, I don’t return ever. So you may lose a couple patrons initially but they’ll be back once they understand that is the general price. You will also get me back since there is no more possibility of bullshit charges.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh, so you mean people won’t order your food if they know what the real price is? Well… fuck you

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        More that sticker shock will keep people from ordering an appetizer with a main meal if everything is $2-3 more expensive than when they last visited

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      unless it’s previously posted clearly to see before I order, I’d just walk out and not pay, because that is otherwise called “fraud.”

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        They do post it but it is in small print on a random ass part of the menu. Not technically fraud but absolutely bullshit.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          We should all take the attitude that if a fee is hidden in any way, including fine print, it is absolutely fraud. There should be no tolerance for businesses trying to trick their customers.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Only fees that are entirely optional — like leaving a tip for staff — can be left out of the posted price.

    How do you say you’ve never worked as a server without saying you’ve never worked as a server?

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Don’t take the downvotes too seriously. Your original point was succinct and poignant. On average, lemmy bombs on anyone going against the popular stance. A whole lot of paper activism goes on here.

      Your point is valid. Not tipping because “fuck the man” only serves to hurt the servers. From a moral consumer standpoint, there’s no winning. You either cut out restaurants entirely, which still fucks the wait staff, or you tip high and hope enough of it ends up in the their pockets.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m downvoting because he’s wrong about servers getting paid below minimum wage in California. That’s true in his shithole state but not ours.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m not offended by downvotes, but usually if I’m downvoted there are comments that correlate so I can understand the alternative perspective. Most of the comments in response were servers at first, so I edited for clarity thinking it was a misunderstanding. It took several comments for me to learn that California pays their servers a decent minimum wage.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Restaurants should be forced to pay their workers a living wage, which is how it works in developed countries. And paying below minimum wage should be illegal.

      • _number8_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        it’s such a fucking joke that they’re allowed to pay like $2/hr because they’ll make it up in tips. just because customers are nice doesn’t mean the employer should get off the hook like that. even the joke federal minimum wage is fuck all, that’s like 1-2 sides at a decent restaurant

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Agreed. Each state differs on tip allowance. In NY, minimum wage is $15 per hour with a $5 tip allowance. That means employers can pay $10 per hour, expecting servers to make at least $5 per hour in tips. If it’s a slow morning of “coffee only paper readers,” it’s easy to come up short of minimum wage for some hours.

        • Drusas@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, and that’s a problem. Tip allowance shouldn’t be a thing. They should be paid a higher base wage. Yes, a lot of servers would dislike that because they make a lot of money in tips, and they often don’t report those tips when it comes to tax time. But that doesn’t mean that the system wouldn’t be improved by eliminating tipping and increasing wages, like they do in the rest of the world.

    • motherr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They might not live in the US. There’s plenty of countries where tipping exists but is actually optional.

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Work a Sunday brunch shift and watch the raft of churchies leave nothing but condescending notes, if anything.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It gets worse than that.

        Some of them leave these on the table. Carefully concealing the deception, of course.

        That’s not even the only type they have available to them:

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Parties of 8 or more often have gratuity on the bill like this. It’s rare to see it otherwise, unless there’s a particular reason (like they know these people never tip).

      • wavebeam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Holy shit. They give god 10% of their income. This server is “asking” for 18% of the price of their bill. They’re not even remotely the same thing.

        I’m generally against tipping, but still do it. I’m way against illogical comparisons like this though.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s called tithing. It’s described as giving 10% of your income or possessions to god in the Old Testament.

          • wavebeam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m aware of tithing. I’m saying that 10% of your income in a tithe is not even remotely the same thing as 18% tip for a single purchase. It’s more comparable to a sales tax than a tithe. One is percentage of a total income, the other is a percentage of a purchase.

    • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Servers are paid below minimum wage because they receive tips.

      Not true in everywhere. For instance Washington requires servers be paid the full minimum wage of $16.28/hr before tips.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d really love it if they did like some countries and added the sales tax(es) to the sticker price in stores too

    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      There are a lot of things I wished they did similar to other countries such as VAT. Hiding all these fees seems deceptive from both the business and the govt sneaking in their taxes.

  • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    We need European pricing where the price is the price. I would go as far as making asking for a tip illegal too. Have restaurants put on their menu that prices include the tip. Raise minimum wage for restaurant workers.

    And not just for restaurants, everything, from airline tickets to concert tickets, etc.

    • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I think clear signage and message on the bill indicating “tipping is optional, service charges is included in the menu price” should suffice.

      Making tipping illegal goes too far, but I am okay with implementing it for couple decades, in order to correct a bad habit.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        OP said “asking for a tip”. If I want to tip a particularly good server experience, everyone should be free to do so. But asking for it, and it comes to mind those places that explicitly stipulate that 10% is minimum mandatory tipping, should be illegal. That’s a hidden fee, not a tip.

      • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Agreed. Though I was at the UPS store and they had a tip jar.

        I was like: who the heck tips at the UPS store?

      • MSids@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        People can’t let go of tipping. A few restaurants near me tried it and ended up closing.

        Tipping isn’t just a part of culture but it also breaks up the spend for the consumer. You commit to a $15 burger now, then the $3 of tip later. Integrating the tips with the cost makes it seem like everything is more expensive and also makes it not optional for how much you give.

        • crispyflagstones@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          …That’s why people don’t like the service fees, etc. It’s difficult to know, as a consumer, how much you’re actually being asked to spend. If you’re rich, haha who cares? Everybody else has to do this thing called “budgeting.”

      • exanime@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Then we are back to where we started where tipping is a guild riddled demand

        Pay waiting staff a livable wage and include that in the price, no tipping

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, tipping is pretty messed up. In a lot of states, wait staff are exempt from the minimum wage because they’re expected to treat tips (which are notoriously unreliable) as part of their salary.

      • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Generally, as here in CO, there is still a minimum wage for staff that are regularly tipped, it’s just lower. I believe it’s also (again, as here) generally required that any time the tipping doesn’t make up the difference, companies are required to make it up instead.

        That being said, it’s basically a way to advertise much lower prices than they actually charge. Roles that often get tipped tend to make pretty good money, and companies would basically never want to pay that much for those roles (especially when they are used to paying even less than minimum wage).

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Weave backed ourselves into a corner for tipping. Restaurants may be convinced to pay a livable wage. But they’re never going to pay the servers what they can actually make in tips.

      I was about 5 years into IT, My girlfriend was waiting tables at Ruby Tuesday. Most days she made more than I did. And depending on how bad they ‘adjusted’ their tax claims …

      That said, some days she did basically pay to work there.

      I suspect if you ask the vast majority of wait staff if they would like to be paid and livable wage or continue a tip-based system they want to stay tip based.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think that’s very dependent on age. When I was in my early twenties, an inconsistent gig with the potential for high tips was very appealing. When I got into my late twenties/early thirties I moved over to events and catering because they offered a high hourly wage with predictable(ish) hours. If the restaurants pay well enough they’ll be able to find people.

        The real problem will be vacation towns. There are some places where most of the restaurants and bars close in the off-season. The staff will work their asses off through the spring and summer, then use their tips to live the rest of the year. For some of these towns, even if the restaurant staff wanted to pick up a job in the off-season, they’d need to drive two hours just to find a part-time gig at Target. I really want tipping to end, but I’m not sure what would happen to these places. The seasonal restaurants could pay more, but I’m not sure they could offer enough to subsidize their staff for half the year.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          How’s that any different? You’d get fewer takers for a seasonal job, so shouldn’t pay go up? Just like they now get disproportionate tips, shouldn’t they get a disproportionate living wage?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        But they’re never going to pay the servers what they can actually make in tips

        Im not sure I believe that. I mean, I’ve also known people who said the same things, so clearly there are people who really make out. However I suspect this is highly variable and there are even more just scraping by. I’m sure it greatly depend on the restaurant and the clientele, as well as the actual effort, and I’m sure it highly depends on looks. That 18yr old hottie at the local hot spot may rake it in, but the elderly matron at the local diner works just as hard but with less opportunity

        Everyone talks about tips being a reward for good service but tips are almost never proportional to service

      • PhilMcGraw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Good for her, but arguably it’s not supposed to be a high paying job. A living wage, sure, but higher than a job that you presumably studied for and required relatively uncommon knowledge seems wrong.

        So I guess the answer is no, we wouldn’t expect restaurants to work out how much people get paid in tips and match it, it would be a liveable wage and if the current workers don’t like it they would leave.

        I don’t know that your girlfriend getting bankrolled is common across the industry either, tips rely on high traffic and customers with big pockets. Most wait staff don’t brag about how rich they are.