It also wouldn’t help for Congress to ban “assault weapons” because it would be soon declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and that would overturn all the state-level bans already in place. Which would be a victory for gun rights and the principles of individual liberty that we should all celebrate.
Yes, I can see that. Your argument is correct. I should have clarified, I meant “how will this help politically?” Any gun owner will look at a ban on assault rifles and laugh because it’s just a sliver of all the kinds of guns. If you really want to make a gun shoot lots of bullets, you don’t need an assault rifle.
Source: me, I live in the South and I’ve shot guns my whole life, although I don’t own any myself. I know several people with guns that would laugh at an assault rifle ban.
They’re not entirely wrong, handguns should also be banned and regulated if you actually want to address gun violence in the way that literally every single country that doesn’t suffer from regular gun violence does.
This is a situation where some familiarity with shooting would be helpful. Changing weapons isn’t as intuitive as the movies makes it, and this law doesn’t fix everything, but iterates a step closer to making it harder to commit mass shootings.
I don’t see how this would help. What’s to stop someone from getting dozens of handguns and switching when they run out of ammo?
It’s not exactly time consuming to switch magazines either
It also wouldn’t help for Congress to ban “assault weapons” because it would be soon declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and that would overturn all the state-level bans already in place. Which would be a victory for gun rights and the principles of individual liberty that we should all celebrate.
I would prefer to celebrate fewer children being shot in schools than your right to play with deadly weapons.
Sorry best USA can do is “the sound of children screaming has been removed”
Are you serious?
You can’t see how lesser bullets per second is helpful when you goal is to lessen the amount of people dying in a timespan?
Yes, I can see that. Your argument is correct. I should have clarified, I meant “how will this help politically?” Any gun owner will look at a ban on assault rifles and laugh because it’s just a sliver of all the kinds of guns. If you really want to make a gun shoot lots of bullets, you don’t need an assault rifle.
Source: me, I live in the South and I’ve shot guns my whole life, although I don’t own any myself. I know several people with guns that would laugh at an assault rifle ban.
Why ban bombs if you can just make them with cleaning supplies?
Ooh you’re so close.
Also yes.
They’re not entirely wrong, handguns should also be banned and regulated if you actually want to address gun violence in the way that literally every single country that doesn’t suffer from regular gun violence does.
It would be a lot more badass when it gets caught in video?
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
It would be a lot more badass when it gets caught in video?
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
This is a situation where some familiarity with shooting would be helpful. Changing weapons isn’t as intuitive as the movies makes it, and this law doesn’t fix everything, but iterates a step closer to making it harder to commit mass shootings.
Bad argument. It’s easier to carry one gun than two.
https://youtu.be/2Q-QVBQVYTA?si=YbbrccFsvRkWLujA also, with good training you can reload a whole lot faster than you can switch guns.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/2Q-QVBQVYTA?si=YbbrccFsvRkWLujA
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
I doubt many are concerned about people with good training.