• Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    For me YT is without ads using Violentmonkey with these scripts:

    But there are more and more YouTubers which promote products in their Videos and promotional videos between the shorts and other in the suggestions list, but at least they can be ignored or skipped.

    • Turd Ferg@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      How are those scripts with updates? YT has been on the ball lately, patching holes. Im definitely going to look into using scripts though, thanks for the rabbithole… see you in a few weeks haha.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m since a half year withot ads since I use these scripts, obviously not detected by YT in their battle with uBO and other known adblocker extensions.Userscripts are a really good alternative to mainstream extensions and independent from the stores. In Greasyfork and OpenuserJS are very interesting scripts you can use. Using them with Greasymonkey or Violentmonkey or in Vivaldi installing them directly as extensions (but then you must update these by hand)

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You should, but it specifically doesn’t work for YouTube. PiHole works by blocking DNS requests to known ad servers. But YouTube hosts their own ads on the same servers that host the videos. So if your pihole blocks the ads, it also blocks the videos you’re trying to watch.

    • jonwyattphillips@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I haven’t seen youtube ads in years. uBlock and sponsorblock extension in Firefox on my laptop. Newpipe with sponsorblock on my phone.

      • lorkano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I wouldn’t survive using internet without those and gdpr, cookie blockers. It’s soooo bad and getting worse.

    • AtariDump@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You should, but it sadly doesn’t work for most video streaming sites.

      Shout out to the PiHole team; miss you guys here on the fediverse!

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hey, Alphabet!

    Want to know how to make a lot more money while being seen as the good guy at the same time?

    Lower the price of youtube premium by at least 30%

    You will still earn way more money from a premium user than a free user, while not being a dick.

    150sek/month is too much, get to down to 100sek/month and I’ll gladly pay.

    You’ll get a shittonne more paying customers at the same time.

    • DuckGuy@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      YouTube’s pricing is a mess. Here’s a quick breakdown of their offer here in France :

      • YouTube Premium (so video + music): 12€/m

      • YouTube Music Premium (music only, obviously): 10€/m

      One would assume based on this that Google values YouTube at only 2€/m per user. But anyway, let’s take a look at their family plans for a laugh:

      • YouTube Premium (6 users): 18€/m

      • YouTube Music Premium (6 users still): 15€/m

      Let’s put aside the price discrepancy. 18/6 = 3€/m per user. All signs point to Google being ok with making between 2 and 3€ per user per month, yet such an offer doesn’t exist. Hell, make it 4€, even. People would flock to it. But no, they’re just being greedy.

      • lorkano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        They are not OK with 2 euro per user. This is just to get people used to using paid versions for dirt cheap before they accumulate solid subscription count. After they they will either remove this family plan or make it more restrictive/expensive just like Netflix started to do

      • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah I pay a buddy 8 every 2 months for music+no ads (+all the other stuff)

        It’s definitely worth it for me but it’s definitely a fucked up pricing model for single users. There should be a sub or something for people to link up 6 people so they can all save monies

        • Observer1199@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          There should be a sub or something for people to link up 6 people so they can all save monies

          That’s exactly what they don’t want though. I wouldn’t say they’ll never offer that but if they did it would be short term until they have enough marker share and the they’ll do what Netflix did. Google (or insert prettyuch any company here) doesn’t want you to save money, they want as much of it as they can get.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Gonna be honest, there’s no price I’d be willing to pay for YouTube Premium.

      I used to pay for YouTube Red. I didn’t cancel it because it was too expensive, I cancelled it in retaliation for all the other shitty things YouTube has been doing. If YouTube wants me to return as a paying member, they need to reinstate the ability for small accounts to monetise their YouTube accounts; they need to stop demonetising/restricting educational content that might be related to war, weapons, sex, or sexuality; and they need to change their copyright policy to make it much, much harder to abuse false claims.

    • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Hey, Alphabet!

      Want to know how to make a lot more money while being seen as the good guy at the same time, while not even lowering prices or adding costs?

      Allow third party apps for premium users that can disable the BS

      You will still earn the same amount of money from both free and premium users, while not being a dick. In fact, third party developers would be doing the work for you!

      Additionally, having apps that can lower the engagement BS reduces your bandwidth costs!

      You’ll get a crap ton more paying customers at the same time. I’d even become one.

  • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If it were visual ads with no audio, I actually think this is a good idea. When you pause you’re ready for an interruption of sorts: it jars the brain less.

    I’d still want to be able to maximise the video still frame to see details sometimes. Just yesterday I watched a 3blue1brown with a brief freeze-frame of extra detail to read if you wanted (and I did!)

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve been getting this on the YouTube app on shield TV and fire TV stick lately. It’s as you said; just click dismiss on the ad and it goes back to full screen.

  • eggmasterflex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This means people in the test market are clicking on those ads. Not much we can do about it at that point - it works therefore they’ll use it.

  • glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    They can put as much ads as they wan’t they will be blocked, and there always will be a way to block them.

  • JSens1998@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ladies and gentleman, this is why competition is desperately needed. It’s only going to continue downhill from here…

    • glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Competition is useless, better to have federated networks and do videos for profit and find other ways to pay for content to support content creators if they need support. Block ads everywhere, work in those fields is better than calling for competition and creating competitor that will win over google and become new google.

      There will be adblocker to block this also don’t worry.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Allowing anyone to upload video and then serving it to anyone in the world, at no cost, is not a viable business model. There’s no competition because there’s no money to be made here.

      • JSens1998@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, and that’s where the issues lie. It will never get better because there is no competition to force Google to improve and they know that. Therefore, free reign.

  • drphungky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I just got one of these the other day. I picked up an Nvidia Shield because I was tired of my shitty Samsung TV not being able to stream Plex correctly and Google is the only data devil I’ve made a deal with. I hadn’t watched much YouTube on it I guess until last night and I couldn’t believe how many ads I saw.

    Holy. Shit. YouTube has ads in the middle of fucking videos now? And then I paused and saw another ad and about lost my shit. Immediately looked up how to adblock on Android TV. Jesus it’s invasive.