The United States is preparing a $1 billion military aid package for Ukraine, the first to be sourced from the yet to be signed Ukraine-Israel bill, two U.S. officials told Reuters on Tuesday.

The aid package includes vehicles, Stinger air defense munitions, additional ammunition for high-mobility artillery rocket systems, 155 millimeter artillery ammunition, TOW and Javelin anti-tank munitions and other weapons that can immediately be put to use on the battlefield, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

President Joe Biden had asked the U.S. Congress to provide $60.8 billion in aid to Ukraine, but the initiative stalled when Republicans in the House of Representatives refused to move the measure forward for months.

On Tuesday the Senate was expected to vote on four bills now passed by the House. One for Ukraine, a second with $26 billion for Israel, a third with $8.12 billion “to counter communist China” in the Indo-Pacific and a fourth that includes a potential ban on the social media app TikTok.

The Ukraine bill also calls for the transfer of ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile Systems) with a range of up to 190 miles, which Kyiv has pledged not to use inside Russia’s territory.

  • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Even if Ukraine loses in the end, that equipment is going to continue to absolutely wreck Russia’s military capabilities for the foreseeable future.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I don’t know who you’re lumping me in with so I have no idea what I’ve been wrong about so far.

        And no. The fact that this new wave of aid will be used to explode Russian equipment is undeniable. I’ll tag you in the threads if you want.

        • redlue@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          So you admit that you didn’t think Ukraine could take back Crimea or other occupied territory with just equipment?

          • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I don’t know why you assume that everybody except you had just decided that Ukraine was going to easily take back Crimea

            It remains the maximal long term outcome, but was never considered a likely result

            • redlue@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I don’t know why you assume that everybody except you had just decided that Ukraine was going to easily take back Crimea

              You must not have been on these forums then when Western nations were discussing sending tanks to Ukraine.

              but was never considered a likely result

              Lol, ok. Soon you’ll be saying the same thing about all the territory Russia takes.

              • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                What do tanks have to die with Crimea lmao?

                Well yeah, if Russia annexed the entirety of Ukraine, that would also be considered the unlikely maximal outcome