• affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    its so tiresome to have all these services constantly made worse. these days it feels whenever a new thing comes out, it has about two or three years before it’s run into the ground in pursuit of the almighty dollar.

    and this kind of thing is also happening to movies/tv shows/video game franchises. it feels like no matter how good it starts, you only get (at most) 2 or 3 sequels before the executives get their hands on it and run it into the ground. sure there are exceptions to this, but they are few and far between. and its becoming even more common for shows/video games to simply disappear if the parent company decides to remove them from online stores/streaming platforms.

    all around, it just feels like things are becoming less and less permanent

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re describing capitalism. That’s literally what happens to everything when capitalism is unchecked.

      “Hey, we’re getting pretty good at producing food. Let’s put corn syrup in everything and make cheap food addictive.”

      “Hey, we just noticed that frightened people buy more guns. Let’s make sure criminals can always buy guns so that we are arming everyone!”

      “Land is the one thing they aren’t making more of. Let’s drive prices up while interest rates are low so that people have to spend all of their income on rent or die in the streets!”

      When profits are the only motivation, then products and services will only get so good before the investor class starts looking for ways to take advantage of leverage instead of innovation. Unregulated markets create opportunities for unbalanced relationships between producers and consumers, and it is always built on the lie that you can influence the markets by “voting with your dollars,” as though enshittification is what we want, what we deserve.

  • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Lol all this time these media companies have had to change their models to align with market forces, we’ve watched them hem and haw, drag their feet, etc. this step shows they never wanted things to change at all, and they have the power and the money to keep change from happening. finally we see them at their end game, harnessing the Internets power for something so tiny. To them, the only benefit to this technology is cutting out the middleman and b bringing able packages to you without negotiations with a cable service.

    Their minds are so small, but this and worse is their greatest dream. It’s a terrible, venal world that small minds lead us to isn’t it?

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      And with channels and continuous running shows comes more potential for commercials which will always be the end goal…

      “They’re paying us for the service and advertising is paying us! It’s a win-lose! My favorite kind!”

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      we need to change them, not get rid of them. i think completely getting rid of IP laws would benefit big corpos like Disney. they would do to any small creator what Amazon does to small shops. they already try to do it as much as possible, but they’d be much more free to crush everyone else smaller than them.

      • daltotron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        how would they crush smaller frontends for content and smaller streaming services if they both have the same content and those smaller front ends are capable of giving me, as it stands, a much better ad free financially free faster lighter weight more customizable product experience?

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          are you saying if Disney and I have the same script in our hands and we’re both free to do whatever we want with it, that I have a better chance of making money off of it than they are?

          and yes, they would totally crush streaming services too. do you have any idea how expensive it is to make a video based service?

          • daltotron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Well ideally you’d fund the development of the product and make profit off of it before launch if you really needed to, either through crowdfunding campaigns, or joining a monthly donation that puts out movies every however many years that are free for all. If a studio or artist puts out bad shit, or puts out something that already existed but just in a chopped up form, people would probably just stop paying that studio or that artist since their credibility would plummet. You could even just rig up a new advertisement scheme as a way to pay creators, which I assume companies would do since they’ve done shit like that with YouTube.

            I also don’t understand your hypothetical here. If Disney puts out a new marvel movie, why the fuck would you make another (presumably) marvel movie that has the exact same script? Likewise, why would Disney copy the script of a fan movie when they could just pay pennies to some put upon Hollywood writer for a script? It’s not like good scripts for movies are really in short supply, and most problems with movies are like that, they come down to shitty executive decisions. Disney’s probably not gonna “release” a chopped up version of your movie that they made for pennies. How would they even monetize that in a post IP world? Why wouldn’t people just watch yours instead, if they did that, since they’re probably accessible through the same avenues in a post IP world? How would Disney not lose all credibility as a company, as a content producer, as a creator of art?

            In any case, if Disney wanted to copy your short film pretty much beat for beat, they could just do that and get away with it pretty much whole hog right now. What are you gonna do, sue Disney? How would you prove that they copied you? Disney’s not stupid enough to just copy and paste the same script, much like you shouldn’t be, they’d change the words, change the aesthetic, etc, making it much harder to prove in a court. And there’s not really a way to solve that problem with more bureaucracy, unless you’re totally changing the economic structure, which I’d also be onboard with.

            This isn’t even getting into how IP works for pharmaceuticals or more important shit. A lot of people died from COVID in African countries because Bill Gates decided to poop his pants over IP law, plenty of people constantly cite the evergreening of insulin.

            I dunno, somehow Disney’s brand didn’t plummet after mickey mouse went public domain, and I’m sure they’re gonna continue making more mickey shit in the future.

            I also don’t know how much it costs to put up a streaming service, but I do know that straight up right now I can watch anime for free with no ads and a better end user experience than any of the mainline streaming services. I can also do that to a lesser degree with basically everything except pro wrestling and other live sports content, because nobody gives a shit about those apparently. Except for AAA and CMLL and lots of foreign promotions which are free on YouTube for some reason.

      • elvith@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        If it weren’t for those pesky content breaks every now and then, they could serve even more ads. Won’t somebody think of the shareholders?

        • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Those damn consumers are so entitled! Why can’t we just serve ads continually instead of having to produce expensive content?

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Is it? If they’re going to make this available for a free/ad priced tier I could see showing ads. But not for the ad free tier.

          • olutukko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            it was mostly a joke but I wouldn’t be too suprised if they actually start showing ads too

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve kinda wished services would do something a bit like this for a while:

    One channel for new stuff, based on your recommendations—just gives you a load of random tastes of shows without you actively picking through things

    One for stuff you rewatch. For example, if you’ve watched always sunny or peep show through a couple of times, put random episodes on this channel for when you just want something in the background

    • dumbass@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      There was a chrome extension a few years ago called ottoplay that did something like this, would take your Netflix Hulu and YouTube accounts and set up channels like comedy movies and shit like that, would play random episode non stop.

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      For the rewatch, on Plex you can build playlists and shuffle them. I do this for my kids, one wants Bluey and the other wants Peppa pig. I let the random gods decide what comes on next.

    • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Gonna need some machine learning for this. How much AI in your streaming service are you comfortable with?

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        As someone very hesitant about AI I’m comfortable with it. It’s a streaming service, not my email inbox.

        • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          One step further: ai “enhanced” TV shows and movies

          We still good, or you ready to start pitching a fit?

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        AI and ML based recommendation engines in streaming services have been a thing for as long as there have been steaming services

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            This sounds like a bit of a slippery slope fallacy, if you’re implying that a steaming service using a recommendation algorithm obviously concludes with sinister personalised AI brainwashing injected into my watching, I think you maybe should watch less black mirror.

            If you didn’t mean that, we’ve been using AI in film and TV for ages now, the latest batch of Star wars films made extensive use of it. Hell, the huge battles in lord of the rings used a rudimentary AI system for governing all the entities in it.

            • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I’m just working my way to asking if you’d watch personalized AI TV bruh, not purposely attempting a fallacy. I’d give it a look, maybe once or twice. Just to see 😂

  • dellish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Let me guess: which channels you have access to depend on your subscription level? Fuck these jerks.

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      And they make sure that you have to buy the full package to get what you want.

      New movie releases only costs $10 per streaming on the platinum-full-extended-live-ultra-package.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    They’re really gonna make people start pirating out of spite lol

  • Manalith@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If they do it like Paramount I’m all for it. I like just throwing on the Star Trek channel rather than deciding what episode of which series I want to watch. That’s part of why I get so much use out of Plex’s Live TV channels. Only difference is paramount doesn’t have ads on their channels

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Live TV is handy for sports, but sort of out of date for the modern habit of binge streaming a series.

      I don’t really want to watch TV starting from the middle of an episode in the middle of a series. I’d much rather just jump to where I was in my Dropout queue and start watching whatever show is next in the list.

      • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Tbh, I have trouble binge watching most shows. I can’t watch more than 2 or 3 of the same show at a time. Idk why I have trouble with it more than others. After, I usually have to switch to a different show, or a different activity, like video games.

      • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not everyone wants to binge a show from start to finish

        For example, I really enjoyed the episodes of the office that I have watched. It was many years ago and it was only random episodes I caught while airing on TV.

        Went to Netflix to watch at started on episode 1. From what I hear season 1 isn’t the greatest. I got through a couple episodes and then thought to myself, this is going to take so many nights of watching to watch them all in order. Never watched another again.

        Now if I could turn on the television and say S6EP7 was playing I’d probably enjoy watching it. Might even watch the next episode too.

        With classic TV you also get the feeling that you’re watching the show with others.

        Channel 1 is having a Harry Potter bingeathon. I catch it on episode 3 and continue to watch it. I’ve seen them all multiple times so I don’t really care where I start. But it’s nice knowing others are having a HP bingeathon with me on a Saturday afternoon. If I was sitting there with my plex server, I could play any HP. But I’m never going to put it on and if I did it would just be me watching the show.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not everyone wants to binge a show from start to finish

          Then don’t.

          Went to Netflix to watch at started on episode 1. From what I hear season 1 isn’t the greatest. I got through a couple episodes and then thought to myself, this is going to take so many nights of watching to watch them all in order. Never watched another again.

          https://variety.com/lists/the-office-best-episodes-ranked/

          Here’s a list of some of the most popular episodes of the office. I’d probably just pick one of the early seasons and go from there.

          Now if I could turn on the television and say S6EP7 was playing I’d probably enjoy watching it.

          Sure. But you can just watch that one straight out. Why simply hope that’s the one Hulu decides to stream at a given moment?

          Channel 1 is having a Harry Potter bingeathon. I catch it on episode 3 and continue to watch it.

          There’s definitely an appeal to rediscovering old classic movies. But in my experience, the amount of crap out there far outweighs the amount of gold. And the purpose of running channels isn’t to give you a steady diet of quality show. Its to run what’s cheapest to run at any given moment.

          You only start seeing Harry Potter on the Daytime Movie Channel when its completely fallen off people’s radars and the rights are cheaper to acquire.

          You’re far less likely to see Channel 1 having a Harry Potter bingeathon than you are to see them showing Gremlins or Home Alone, because these series are far cheaper to fill non-prime air time with.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Some people just like to be able to click on one button and have someone or something else decide for you. In my country linear TV is at least for public service still more popular than the great (completely free, open, and mostly DRM free) streaming service.

            I personally don’t like linear television (or something like this) but I can see why some would.

            People that like it won’t suddenly decide otherwise just because you pointed out that streaming is technically better.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I have playlists set up in Plex that I use like a TV channel. One’s all [adult swim] cartoons, another is old sci fi, another is just documentaries. Best part is no commercials.

      • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’d say the best part in this scenario is not having to use Paramount’s garbage software.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, been that way for a while. I assume either this tweet is old as fuck, or they’re adding more paid for ones. Or some regions don’t have it that way yet.

      The discoverability on D+ is awful as well. There’s loads of older stuff and all it wants to show me is shitty “reality” TV I couldn’t give a fuck about, and have never watched. I’m only on it now because the wife is halfway through Buffy and can’t remember where to find it again if I torrented it and I can’t be arsed with the aggro.

  • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    So same old broadcast thing, but with internet, a framework designed to send a different data to each user.
    Meaning you will be wasting way more energy with the same stream going in different packets to people.

    Sure, that would definitely be cheaper.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This has been the plan for decades.

    Telecom companies existed before the internet and have made every effort their television fiefdoms would have the right to own it as well.

    Then again the only bastion of defense against this has been a parade of old ass people who don’t own computers and were handed a smartphone 15 years ago but only want campaign donations in exchange for not understanding the problem.

    So it really wasn’t much effort at all to turn the internet into TV 2.0.