It seems like the FOSS community is continuing to grow, and FOSS apps keep getting better (Immich reallh blew my mind recently), which is a big win 😎 but there are still many apps I use that I would kill for an open source alternative. I am curious what you guys think? Are there any apps you’d love alternatives for?

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Let’s see if Loops can fill the gap. Not sure if an open source alternative could generate enough hype to be viable - maybe if TikTok is banned in the US or something.

      • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Holy smokes! I was an avid TikTok person for music before they enshittified it with ads and the shop features. Can’t wait for Loops!

  • Wooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Exchange and Outlook for business use.

    No nothing else comes close.

    It’s the last app in MS Office that does not have competition. LibreOffice fills ever other app well enough but nothing comes close to exchange and Outlook. Considering they are trying to kill it off with an always online website (OWA) we need foss competition asap.

  • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Canva.

    Their feature set and functionality is great, but their vendor lock-in is really off-putting. Even just within their platform, it’s really difficult to move assets around within workspaces.

    Let alone edit graphics that you made on Canva and edit them elsewhere, say Penpot, for example.

  • 10_0@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    OSMAND, since they started tracking users a while ago on the f-droid version.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s the dumbest thing, but right now I just really want a better open source alternative to Advanced IP Scanner. Or I want someone to add a filter (especially by MAC) option to Angry IP Scanner. Whatever. I just want an IP scanner that can filter by MAC and works on Linux.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Would you by any chance mind sharing? I was going to make my own, but a good starting point never hurts.

        (feel free to say no, I don’t want to impose)

        • MenigPyle@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Honestly I would if I could.

          The reason I redo it is because I change work places… And it’s one of those things I could actually bring with me no problem because it doesn’t contain confidential data, but also since it’s so trivial, I don’t think of it until I’m on to the next place.

          And I haven’t made a new one since last change 😂

          What I’d probably do today is to list out the constraints and what I’d like to have work, then ask ChatGPT or Bing AI to make it for me, e.g.;


          On a system running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 I should like a simple ping tool. It should be written using best practices, contain a shebang, follow all good guidelines for scripting and for the tools used. It should print out a help section with example if called without arguments. If no flags are provided, it could be hostnames or an IPs. Alternative, it can accept an argument of a CIDR range following a switch, '--range 10.2.3.4/30'. When it has verified the input, the following tests should be made for the IP, hostname or IPs, per IP involved;
          
          • If IP, PTR lookup
          • if hostname(s), look up A and AAAA records
          • It should try opening all the most common ports using netcat, telnet, nmap or similar
          • It should pretty print a concise and user friendly report of all outcomes

          The script should be error free, print out helpful error messages when something occurs and gracefully degrade using ‘try/catch’ or similar. As far as possible, it should use different functions internally to ensure modualirty and maintainability.


          That would give you a Python or Bash script most likely. It’s going to give you an 80% done script. Probably also experiment with feeding it a type of output you’d prefer. Hope that helps!

            • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m actually looking at doing a wrapper around NMap. Personally I’m fine with “Just use NMap” as a solution, but I need something that’s usable by people who know only a little about Linux and aren’t super comfortable in the command line. So I want to do stuff like enumerating the interfaces and just letting them pick one to scan instead of having to specify a network. I’ll probably work in a really basic UI using Dialog or something as well.

  • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    An alternative to iTunes so that I don’t need a Windows VM to backup my company iPhone. But I know it’s never gonna happen because Apple is the devil.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It’s a long shot, but a viable alternative to Google Maps or other proprietary mapping websites (and no, OpenStreetMap is not a viable Google Maps alternative).

    EDIT: Not sure why downvotes, OpenStreetMap doesn’t even have directions as far as I can tell.

    • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      OSM is not that user friendly as Google Maps for sure, but if you really want you really can replace GMaps. It probably heavily depends on your country and if the OSM community is active there, but for example here in Germany the mapping information is basically on par with GMaps

        • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          There are many APPs build on top of OSM that can do directions in a user friendly way. Personally I use MagicEarth, which uses OSM but isn’t itself open source. They include live traffic from some other nav provider.

          My goal was to degoogle my phone and MagicEarth was the app which came closest, but I bet you can find all sorts of webapps or fully open source ways to get directions if you don’t care for live traffic.

        • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          You have to use an app for that. OSM is mostly a big database with an API access to it. There are a lot of them out there with a lot of different focusses. For navigating with a car OSMand is pretty good. They are on fdroid.

        • keverets@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Visit openstreetmap.org or osm.org for short and where you can search for a place there’s an icon with arrows beside it. Hit that and then you can put in the From and To. You can pick car routing or bike routing or walking.

            • dont_lemmee_down@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              AFAIK someone is working on it. But the problem is the high dynamics of public transport. Routes and schedules get changed quite often, schedules might be quite irregular (think only Sunday at 3:14). And all that data has to be stored offline. Stops might be changed do to construction work for a week. And that is in the optimal case: In some countries the bus comes when it comes, and stops if it wants to stop.

              Currently you can see where the lines of a bus or the metro go, but that’s about it, I think.

    • dont_lemmee_down@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The thing is, OSM is not comparable with GoogleMaps. OSM is just a (gigantic) database and is in many cases way more complete than GoogleMaps. What people usually associate with OSM is a rendered version of the database focused on what ever the renderer decided: bike lanes, waterways, hiking trails, etc. Many other apps actually use their database: OrganicMaps, Komoot, etc. And even more their rendered tiles. Now there are so many functionalities that this database doesn’t do like geocoding (searching for adresses), reverse geocoding (getting the adress of a point) or route planning, but there are tools for it build on OSM data. e.g. Nominatim does geocoding and graphhopper does routing.

      And to be honest, if you’re travelling by bike graphhopper does a way better job at routing than google. An other plus, you can download the complete data for offline usage. All of Europe is only around 60GB.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The thing is, OSM is not comparable with GoogleMaps.

        I mean… Yes that’s literally what I said. I don’t know if there is any of these apps that really provide all that Google Maps provides. But I’d be interested if they do.

        • dont_lemmee_down@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          They will never do, because they are not trying to. AFAIK no one is trying to build FOSS reviews of restaurants/stores, no one is building street view and no one is saving where you live to make the one click from work to home route planning. For me, those are not functions that I need (or want). I need a map that works offline, does route planning (offline) and allows me to display multiple GPX files at the same time.

          Does OSMAnd have all that? It does, so for me it’s an alternative. What use case do you have?

    • ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Organic Maps honestly hasn’t been that bad for me, but searching addresses is appalling and I do need to rely on Google Maps in many instances still. However, it has made it much easier for me to contribute to OSM and have a better user experience. A step in the right direction at least

      • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I use Organic Maps to find places by name and OSMand to find places by address. Both can only the do one of the two things good, but it is doable.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Is Organic Maps only on the mobile apps? Is there no way to view it in a desktop browser? The website seems to just lead me to the apps.

        • sab@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s just an app, yeah.

          OpenStreetMaps is amazing, but it is a map, not a whole ecosystem like Google Maps is. As a map I find it’s often better than Google Maps, but what is still lacking are good front-ends implementing a wide range of functionality in a user friendly way.

          On desktop I often use GNOME Maps, but it leaves a lot to be desired still and is obviously intended for Linux users running GNOME.

          • RayJW@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I don’t know why it isn’t mentioned anywhere on their website. But Organic Maps does have a desktop app. At least on Linux there is the Flatpak. I don’t know about other platforms.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Honestly i never enjoyed discord It is messy and difficult to find information once its a few days old

      Id much rather use a decent forum really

      • Techognito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is more of a hammer as a screwdriver problem, where everyone decided to use chat software as a forum.

        • sibachian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          almost every hobby has moved to facebook and it’s the same damn thing. utterly useless for the purpose people try to use it for.

          i don’t know what the fuck is wrong with people, but this is definitely one of the pinnacles.

          • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            They want to use a single account for everything and have the most people possible.

            That is it really. They don’t want to have to make 50 new accounts where every account has to deal with getting past the spam policies and filters only to find that their potential base is 1/10 of that on other platforms

            That’s why reddit became the de-facto forum for many things also. 1 interface, 1 account, people can trace your account across different “forums” and it was searchable (on search engines, not shit reddit search).

    • vort3@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you’re talking about voice channels specifically, then there is Mumble.

      If you’re talking about chat rooms, old school solution is IRC and we have XMPP that works fine for most people.

          • Akasazh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            … Ok I’ll let you have that ‘technical correct’ smug satisfaction, you bastard.

            • vort3@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              But for real, if you can’t / don’t want to host your own server, just use any server from hundreds of available servers.

              • Akasazh@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Oh I’s been a while. My clan hosted our own mumble server, back in the day. Didn’t know there was a lot of public ones nowadays…

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        No I meant an app that looks similar and contains most of the features (servers specifically) so it’s easier for not tech savvy users to get into. Someone suggested revolt but its privacy (as in sending the data to not privacy respecting third parties) is questionable so idk if I can consider it a good enough alternative

    • FrostKing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I keep hearing people recommend signal messenger as an alternative to discord, and honestly that’s the most obvious sign you don’t actually use discord

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I recently ran into that very issue, leading to me downloading (foss) third party clients for discord which are privacy focused. As long as discord is still the place to be I have to be there too, but I can certainly limit the data they can gather about me. I found

      • goofcord for desktop (supports plugins too)
      • aliucord for android

      Perhaps they are an option for you too

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Didn’t know those existed.
        Aliucord looks like a modified client tho, so not really open source.

    • ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Especially with the upcoming implementation of ads. Really sucks that many communities and software support (who should have just had forums) are deeply embedded into it and will have to start from scratch and lose any and all helpful content. Its hard to see big communities moving to anything else anytime soon, even of there was a great Foss alternative. It would indeed be amazing to have one in the first place

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Adoption is always the main issue, as we can see here on the Fediverse. It’s crazy how even technically-inclined people flock to discord. So many 3d printing communities are on there, people who install custom debian distros on raspberry pis, solder wires, crimp connectors and assemble open source machines, still fall into the trap.

      • brrt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I think what’s even worse than ads is many channels now require verification through a phone number if you want to write something. Not sure when that became a thing but I just recently ran into this roadblock and noped tf out.

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Matrix is also extremely complicated to sign up for. I tried getting some tech savvy friends to sign up for Matrix the other day. Even for someone tech-savvy it is waaaaaaaay too complicated. Many of the clients don’t even have a sign up option, you need to sign up elsewhere first.

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        There are instances that are not very hard to sign up for. The main issue with Matrix is instability and performance, especially when communicating with users/groups on different instances. It’s really not a great experience. And the inability to properly delete messages can be a big deal too

      • ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah…for many of these programs the onboarding is so daunting, even for those who are tech savvy. Laymen don’t stand a chance with something that is that complicated. It doesn’t often seem to be a technical issue either, more-so a user experience or design problem

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          personally when it comes to the onboarding im more on the side of “self host your own onboarding, for friends and family and shit, and then federate out from there if needed.”

          Theoretically doing a clean onboarding shouldn’t be very difficult. More involved i suppose, but if you don’t have the time to figure out how a federated instance works, (or to properly document it) you shouldn’t be on the internet, you have more pressing matters to attend to.

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It doesn’t often seem to be a technical issue either, more-so a user experience or design problem

          Oh 100%. The problem is that there’s a lack of UX designers and such in the Open Source community. There’s technical people building stuff but they often don’t know how to make a good user experience (or in some cases they don’t care to).

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            IDK why this always gets downvoted. UI/UX some of the biggest issues with FOSS software, and is a massive barrier to entry to someone who isn’t a massive computer nerd willing to put up with that shit.

            • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I guess they take any criticism of open source as if you are against the whole movement. I don’t understand either.

      • chebra@mstdn.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        @SorteKanin I’d like to see that. I have already onboarded about 35 students and my whole family to matrix, nobody had any problems with signup. Bigger problem is later if they get the infamous “Unable to decrypt message” error.

      • Handles@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Many of the clients don’t even have a sign up option, you need to sign up elsewhere first.

        It’s inconvenient, sure, but think of it as an assurance that you’re not locked in with one app.

        That said, I completely agree that Matrix and Element need to work on UX, particularly making it easy for new users to adopt it as well as verification/device switching.

      • Timber@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Can’t relate. It’s not harder to get your hands on a matrix account in comparison to a mail account. And for those that want it even easier, just download Element and you are guided through the default registration at matrix.org

    • ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      What about Signal?? I know it’s not perfect but it seems like more people are using it each year. Whatsapp really has the majority of the market though, and it is so difficult to get people to change messaging apps (in the US at least, where I swear 95% of people have an iPhone and a superiority complex)

        • Otter@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s still relevant to this question, but I don’t think the problem is the app itself. A new app likely won’t help solve this problem

          Cloud backups are on the way and I imagine that will help give Signal a boost

          • ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Completely agree. At this point it seems like it just needs time for the momentum to build (more and more users vouching for it). I didn’t know they were adding cloud backups, that’s great. Usernames have been helping too, I think!

    • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I Don’t have WhatsApp anymore. Though I just deleted my WhatsApp account and said that I am no longer reachable via that crap. If you want to contact me use Signal. Most of my friends just installed Signal (a few took some time), but if you don’t do it that way you will never get away from WhatsApp just because of the network effect… And yes, you will miss out on some groups

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Photoshop.

    And yeah, no, please, don’t come over and mention Gimp and Kryta and all the others. I get it, they’re cool for the stuff they do. They just aren’t the all in one package that Photoshop is or have as powerful tools specifically for photo editing. Photoshop would require a Blender-style major effort to replicate and Gimp just isn’t up to it. I wish it were. Photoshop is at the perfect intersection of being uniquely capable and walled off behind the single crappiest ecosystem in software.

    Nobody likes Adobe, nobody wants to work with Adobe. Nobody can avoid Photoshop. That’s just the world we live in and I don’t like it.

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well, counterpoint: Photoshop tries to be an “everything for everybody” app, and GIMP/Krita don’t need to compare to that, as little as any user needs all the features of Photoshop.

      Nobody can avoid Photoshop

      Call me nobody, then. I worked with the Adobe suite professionally for 15+ years, haven’t touched it for the past six. You won’t find a single 1:1 replacement. It’s just a matter of quitting and accepting the individual limits of different alternatives.

        • Handles@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Not much, honestly. Fortunately I was never very reliant on vector graphics.

          Inkscape IMO never really matured to a working solution, certainly not comparable to Illustrator, but I know others have better experiences.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s a groupthink issue anyways. 3DSmax/Maya was the same for a long time, and “everyone” was saying Blender is not an alternative. And then some big companies switched to Blender and suddenly people stopped complaining about it. And while Blender did improve during that time, it did not improve so substantially that it really made all the difference.

        • Handles@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s absolutely that, like the office admin workers who swear by Microsoft Office over open alternatives no matter how insidious Windows becomes. “I know this one tool and you will have to wring it from my cold dead hands”…

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I agree that it depends on your use case. If you’re an artist or illustrator you can make do with a number of alternatives and just go elsewhere for photo editing, and if you’re just doing basic adjustments to photos rather than detailed edits you can figure it out as well.

        Photohop is harder to bypass if you’re a jack-of-all-trades user mostly doing image editing but also dabbling in the other options from time to time. That’s not to say you can’t do it if you try, but it’s going to be less convenient and add friction to your workflow.

        • Handles@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, Jack-of-all-trades here as well. For sure it’s less convenient to have to switch programs for different purposes but there is also the added convenience of not having to find pirated and cracked Adobe warez.

    • ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It does seem like a hopeless situation sometimes. I used to be a graphic designer and honestly it is very difficult to switch to any other program that is cohesive. Especially with the addition of AI features in Photoshop (keyword, I know, but generative fill can be extremely helpful in some cases). The Affinity suite is barely even able to keep up, and they have employees that are paid. Cross-compatibility and file type standards are a massive issue too, let alone the functionality itself

    • anon5621@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Also would be nice to have open source ecosystem with blender ,then open source pro level video editing like da vinci and open source photoshop.

      • metaStatic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m happy to give Black Magic Design my money.

        I literally wouldn’t piss on Adobe if it was on fire.

    • vsis@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nobody likes Adobe, nobody wants to work with Adobe. Nobody can avoid Photoshop. That’s just the world we live in and I don’t like it.

      This sounds like Stockholm syndrome. You are just too familiar with Photoshop, so using anything else is hard and less efficient.

      In photography there is this mantra about “the most important part is right behind the camera”. A good photographer is not a good Nikon user, or good Canon user. A good photographer can deliver decent pictures with a potato camera if needed.

      Sure, a potato camera is less efficient for any work that an actual good one. So it’s good to invest in a good brand. But the point is: if you are not capable to make average results with a potato software, the problem is not in the software.

      • Miss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        You know why the person themselves is the important part of this equation?

        Because they know what tools to use for which purpose.
        For example, GIMP is only now getting non-destructive editing through adjustment layers, which is such an indispensable feature for important projects

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Exactly… easily replaceable but you have an endless whining of users that imagine they might somehow in the future need this one feature that office has but alternatives don’t.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s an increasingly small number, if only because now Google is in that market, too.

          However, there is a second reason you need Office, and that’s compatibility. I don’t use Office for work normally, but I still have an Office account (which, annoyingly, is how you pay for Office now), because I have clients who want to work on their formats and it doesn’t make sense for me to work around compatibility and have an argument about it instead of just paying for the damn thing and working with whatever software other people want to work.

          But if I was by myself and didn’t need to work with anyone else ever? Yeah, I would not miss much from Office, honestly.

          • TCB13@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            But if I was by myself and didn’t need to work with anyone else ever? Yeah, I would not miss much from Office, honestly.

            That’s my position as well. But there are certain features that I do require for work and other integrations with other MS products that you can’t get elsewhere.

            As you said if one lives in a bubble and doesn’t to collaborate with others then native Linux apps might work and might even deliver a decent workflow. Once collaboration with Windows/Mac users is required then it’s game over – the “alternatives” aren’t just up to it.

            Windows/Office licenses are “cheap” and things work out of the box. Software runs fine, all vendors support whatever you’re trying to do and you’re productive from day zero. Sure, there are annoyances from time to time, but for most people they’re way fewer and simpler to deal with than the hoops you’ve to go through to get a minimal and viable/productive FOSS-only experience. It all comes down to a question of how much time (days? months?) you want to spend fixing things and dealing with small compatibility issues that simply work out of the box under MS for a minimal fee. For most people paying for MS and doing their job right away delivers a better ROI than going FOSS and then doing their job while dealing with the small details.

            • MudMan@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I object to that “work out of the box” comment. I have lost more work hours to OneDrive being terrible than to any single other technical reason. Office has at least as many quirks and inefficiencies as any of its alternatives.

              It’s a bit of a standard and it doesn’t… not… work? So yeah, it’s the go-to you have to have as a fallback for things to not get annoying when you work with multiple other people outside your same organization on something. Alternatives are as good or better, though, especially if you consider commercial ones as well as FOSS ones.

              But yeah, it’s priced just so that it makes sense to pay for it and not use it over not having it ready to go when you need it. On purpose. Which sucks.

              Windows is a different story. Quirky and annoying yes, but not more so than the alternatives and definitely the standard for big chunks of things in ways that it’s not trivial to replace.

              • TCB13@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                But yeah, it’s priced just so that it makes sense to pay for it and not use it over not having it ready to go when you need it. On purpose. Which sucks.

                Yes, marketing. Microsoft is good at it.

                • MudMan@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I don’t even know if I give them that. I guess pricing things just at the edge of you begrudgingly buying them instead of going elsewhere is “marketing” if you squint. I mean, by all accounts they’re worse at branding than Apple and worse at PR than literally everybody else in their competing markets. After a certain critical mass it probably doesn’t matter much, I suppose. At least not short term.

              • taladar@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Teams is also the meeting system furthest from “just works” in my experience. Not sure where all the Microsoft apologists get those ideas that stuff made by Microsoft “just works”.

  • lesteross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Man, this thread has some big “choosing beggars” energy and I despise it. “I want a program which does x, I know there is a program that does x but it doesn’t do everything that the paid program does”.

  • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    SnagIt!

    Flameshot is great, but it lacks too many features I’ve come to depend on from SnagIt! and I would absolutely pay for a Linux port even if it isn’t FOSS

  • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Snapchat and Google Docs are the only two non-FOSS apps I can’t shake off.

    It would be cool to have a Snapchat clone based on Briar.

    Google docs because I don’t trust myself with my own data, I always end up delteting important documents cause I save them to random locations when cleaning house. Having it all in once place, with autosync, search and a nice powerful mobile interface is really convenient.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Are there cloud providers of OnlyOffice? That’s the best FOSS option IMO. LibreOffice and OpenOffice were OK, but not nearly as good.

    • ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I can relate with trusting yourself with data 😂😅 would love to self host Immich, but I have continued to make silly mistakes and would 100% screw myself over if I had all my eggs in one basket with just a home server for files. At the moment I managed to completely degoogle and settle on Proton Drive, which although far from perfect, has been significantly improving (no Linux client yet though 😐). Syncthing has been looking more promising too. Maybe one of those could work for you?

      • Lemongrab@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Try having your self hosted services backup to an external (or at least a separate) drive, where each service has its own folder.