• dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Poverty hardly justifies crime. It is a cause not a justification. They are still poachers doing illegal hunting for protected animal on protected land. Also poaching is rather lucrative, even if the government raises income 200% poaching will still stand out.

    • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah no if I can feed my starving family by killing some animal I would take that in a heartbeat. In contrast, if I can work in a factory and make enough to live decently I’m not going into the woods to try and kill something that can kill me back and risking getting into trouble with the law. Have fun in perfect actor land where you live though.

      • dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They can choose to hunt deer or I don’t know monkey to feed their family or even steal food. All justified. Poaching is extremely lucrative. Its like saying I’m robbing my sixth bank because I’m poor. They are not eating the rhino. I’m not OK with gunning these people but it is a shit act even if you are poor

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Poverty does justify crimes. When you need to eat, killing a rhino not so bad.

      I hate this mentality where poverty crimes are evil but any rich guy destroying the lives of millions of people through financial schemes or to make a better profit are considered almost like good guys. This is completely fucked up.

      • EndOfLine@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So if they are poor and eradicating a species off the face of the planet, then they should get a pass? They have the equipment and skills to hunt non-endangered animals which would provide food for themselves and their family. Excess meat could likely be traded or sold. Poaching is not a crime of necessity.

        • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem is that under Indian law, hunting non-endangered species such as deer and rabbit is just as illegal (most of the time).

      • dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is a broad spectrum of crimes, from stealing an apple to mass murder other people. When you decide to steal food from the supermarket to feed your family it is justified. Hunting… I don’t know… deer or hogs is justified so they can feed their family. But picking a very lucrative business and say you are doing it coz of poverty is kinda fucked. Just for clarity: I’m not agreeing with gunning these people down.

    • Fuckass [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you really think the poachers surrounded by wild animals that can kill them and ‘animal loving’ deaths squads are living lavishly and eating lobster and steak dinners?

      • dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is all relative. Their paychecks are nothing compared to what people have in the west, they are not eating lobster. Its like you get 1 usd a day for manual labor or 100 usd for a single rhino shot. So the difference is multiple fold. They know what are they getting into. It’s like someone asks you to sell coke. You know you will get easy money and you know the risks as well.

    • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hunting is perfectly normal and has been a key to human survival since the dawn of man. It’s suddenly immoral because some capitalist country said so?

      Rethink what crime is.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a bit of a difference between hunting a gazelle for its meat and another for poaching an endangered rhino for its horn.

        • PosadistInevitablity [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because otherwise rich people won’t get to see them on safari.

          No animal life is inherently more valuable than one another. The concept is absurd and so full of contradictions.

          I’m not about to cheer the violent murder of a human being to preserve a fucking safari.