• Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s so sad how derivative phone designs are becoming. This looks even more like an iPhone than the redesigned Galaxy S series. The only market with any originality is the folding/flip one and that’s only because Apple have entered it yet.

  • UESPA_Sputnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’m still not quite sold on the pill-shaped camera bar but I suppose this design helps with consistency across different types of device (normal phones, foldables, tablets), unlike the current camera visor.

  • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Oh come on, that camera bar sticks out so much. I am so tired of this design gimmick. Every Pixel phone with a case already looks ridiculously thick just so that the stupid bar is protected. With how thick it looks on the Pixel 9, the whole phone is just going to be a chonker by the time someone slaps a case on it.

    All this coming at a time when my perfectly fine Pixel 5 just got EOLed is demoralizing.

  • Nath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    the days of being remotely excited by phone design are way behind us. This looks like an iPhone 4 with a pixel 6+ camera bar. Meh.

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    image

    image2

    image3

    The Pixel 9 will have rounded corners with a flat display and a centered punch-hole selfie camera. The power button and volume keys are placed on the right side of a flat frame. The smartphone will feature a 6.03-inch display, slightly smaller than the Pixel 9 Pro’s 6.1-inch display.

    In terms of dimensions, the Pixel 9 measures around 152.8 x 71.9 x 8.5mm, and 12mm with the rear camera bump, OnLeaks tells us.

    So imitating Apple, a bunch of useless stuff like “adaptive touch depending on environment” and wireless charging.

    Still no headphone jack.

    Wow.

    • MaXimus421@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I struggle to understand why in 2024 you are dieing on the hill of a headphone jack. It’s over. Let it go.

      There’s no argument you can make that will have any logic to it. There once was, but that time has passed, pal.

      I am 99 percent sure if a guy had a jack on his phone, yet were listening to stuffs via BT headphones and they died, he wouldn’t have a set of wired headphones on him.

      And if I just so happen to have some wired ones on me to offer him, he’d probably be like,

      “nah, thanks. I’ll just charge these for 15 mins and it’ll last another 3 hrs”

      Let it go…

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s not over, though. Many mid-range and low-end phones are still being released with headphone jacks. Clearly there is a) still a market to sell this feature to and b) still a way of incorporating a headphone jack into the design of a modern smartphone. We can theorise and speculate over whether this market had crossover with the one that bought high-end phones (before the manufacturers forcibly split them into separate groups by only offering the headphone jack on their cheaper models) or whether a mid-range or low-end phone has the same design limitations as a high-end phone, but I think it’s perfectly valid to continue to question why the headphone jack disappeared on more expensive phones. I don’t think consumers have received an honest or acceptable explanation yet from manufacturers, and for as long as that is the case there will be people who feel like they’ve been fucked over by yet another “courageous” example of planned/forced obsolescence.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I guess the real question is how many people use it? I have not seen a pair of wired headphones in use in years.

          • Ilandar@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s half of the question. The other half is whether wired earphones would have died out as quickly as they have appeared to if phone manufacturers had not removed the headphone jack whilst simultaneously pushing their own brand of TWS earphones, often in a bundle with the new phone. Prior to TWS you didn’t see that many Bluetooth earphones. A lot of people still got around with the famous wired iPhone ones, for example.

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Those Gaming phones have nonexistent updates, and others are way less secure than Googles and thus not supported by GrapheneOS.

        I switched from a Nokia with unofficial LineageOS to GrapheneOS, simply because I need this level of security to feel safe.

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It is a huge security improvement. Using a DAC means I need to have USB always enabled (GrapheneOS has a toggle to disable all data which I would otherwise use) and Bluetooth is

        • used for tracking peoples movements
        • forcing expensive planned obsolescence heaphones with tiny li-ion batteries and proprietary chargers
        • also a security threat, as you have an open connection without any reason
    • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Forget the headphone jack. Give me back my SD card slot so I don’t need to pay for your shitty storage for my own pictures.