• Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Real question: how can you tell the difference between rust and a supposed patina that forms and changes over time? I’m not talking about Cybertrucks, those are just rusting. But some chromium based metals supposedly can do this over time and can look like rust initially. Does rust usually cause pitting or flaking?

        • interrobang@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, patina is a thin layer of oxidation on top of the actual material from contact with the air.

          Rust is corrosion from air + moisture, and causes pitting and flaking. Patina should just sit over the surface, but not distort the thing it’s on.

          There is more nuance to it, but patina is on top, rust is the actual thing turning into rust

          • Neato@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Thanks. I’ve got a metal decoration made from weathering steel that has what appears to be rust spots all over it. Allegedly it will do this onto the entire surface and eventually fade into a darker color. But it’s been pretty slow. But no putting or flaking at least.

      • aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        When a road bike has drop handlebars that are turned upwards so that the rider can ride in a more upright position, resembling the horns in this photo.

        It usually indicates that the rider is unused to riding a road bicycle, or that they purchased the incorrect bike for their needs. The joke is that people who lose their license or vehicle due to driving under the influence (DUI) are most likely to set up their bikes this way for the aforementioned reasons.

        • over_clox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve worked on many bicycles in my life, and usually in my experience people turn the handlebars upwards like that because they bought the bicycle used and have neck/back issues.

  • Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Does the cybertruck have just 1 giant wiper? That seems…fucking stupid. You can see the passenger top side of the windshield isn’t clear which might be needed. Also the wiper blade must surely be proprietary meaning, wait I can just look it up: $75. Less than I thought somehow.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        But that is Mercedes-Benz, a company that is already known for being able to design a car. The “cybertruck” looks like it was designed by a ten year old, and, as the wiper shows, not actually smartly executed.

      • evranch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have a 93 Mercedes with this system and I love showing off the wiper. Its unexpected motion brings joy to both mechanical nerds and regular people. No joke, people see it and can’t help but grin. It’s that perfect combination where it looks odd but also is immediately recognizable as clearly superior.

        Must have been patents that kept it from catching on?

      • yuriy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The wipers on the mercedes work better than two blade setups as well. You don’t get that trailing line of water off the tip of the wiper right in the center of your view because the one blade extends all the way to the edge, all the way across.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Mercedes is often at the forefront of new car tech. It doesn’t always catch on, though.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It is one blade and it has good enough reach that the drive would have no complaints about coverage.

      The reason they did it like this is because Elon is over ambitious and over hypes everything and originally wanted a wiper that was vertical and moved in a linear motion back and forth across the windshield.

      Obviously they didn’t engineer that and settled for the comically large standard blade that ships with it. I’m also curious how much one of those bad boys costs. Probably more than 2 for a standard car

      • Dultas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Also where to get it. I don’t think AutoZone is carrying 50in wiper blades standard.

  • Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Looks like they have been through water in it? Seems like an EV use case, not needing air for combustion. But I wouldn’t trust a tesla to be air tight…

    • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They probably pay $89.99/month for the “rugged individualist” upgrade where someone smears dirt on it every 2 weeks. They probably threw in the horns as a bonus lol

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wow I’ve never seen one out in the wild before! I also wouldn’t have imagined anyone could make it look even more obnoxious but here we are lol

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh I’d certainly hope so, that’s a given. Still seems like it would trigger some sort of constant warning though.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        As much as I hate cybertrucks and the sort of people who would buy them, I hate the diminishing of our property rights even more and thus have to object to the notion of manufacturers punishing people for exercising their right to modify their property. Frankly, the “glorified cruise control” ought to be Free Software to begin with so that the owner could modify it as well, to be compatible with the horns. (The owner would of course be legally responsible for the result, but that goes without saying since it’s how property law has worked for hundreds of years.)

        What should happen is that if the modifications make the car unsafe (whether because of the cruise control, the horns themselves failing pedestrian safety standards, or otherwise), the government prohibits the owner from driving it on public roads. But the keys are that it would be a restriction by government (not the manufacturer) of how the thing could be used affecting the public (not whether it’s allowed to exist at all).

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, without the last part I would’ve argued about safety, but restricting the use while allowing modification seems quite good. Except I’m not sure how to enforce safety checks often enough