genuinely curious as to why people choose that brand, are alternatives really that bad?

As I see it:

  • you pay for the hardware and software, which is fine, but
  • if you want to upgrade the OS, you have to pay once again, but this doesn’t work if your hardware model stops being supported. Why pay for something with a limited life expectancy?
  • you cannot get rid of bloatware, only hide it
  • software is made specifically to be only compatible within their ecosystem. If you want to build up on existing software and hardware, you either stay in their system and keep paying them or start anew with a freer alternative.
  • I find it ridiculous they use fancy names to name even their support staff instead of just calling it support staff. Why make things complicated?
  • I don’t understand why they use pentalobe screws instead or regular ones (with a line or a cross section)

Feel free to correct me, I may be misguided.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    0·
    9 months ago

    I’m not trying to convince you of anything, just correct some information readers might stumble across.

    Enjoy using android.

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.eeEnglish
      0·
      9 months ago

      Huh? You weren’t correcting any misinformation, just providing additional information. No one had said that iOS had a password length limit, just that Android does.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        0·
        9 months ago

        My mistake, I read

        Android is definitely the lesser of two evils. I fucking hate SAF with a passion. A phone which doesn’t let me have a 20 digit passcode says letting my apps access my Download folder is insecure, and thus, not allowed?

        As talking about ios lol.

        My assumption was that android would of course allow the user to let applications do stuff in downloads (maybe just like you) and I don’t know what SAF was.

        Til. Thanks!