In addition to tracking the printer’s online or offline status, page count, and ink levels, your rented printer will look at the types of documents you’re printing (e.g., PDF, JPG, Word), the types of devices that initiated the print job, “peripheral devices,” and other “metrics” related to the service, the All-In Plan’s terms read. This is on top of the personal information HP collects upon initiating the plan, like your location and your company name (if you have one). By signing up for the service, the terms say, you “grant to HP a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free right to use, copy, store, transmit, modify, create derivative works of and display [your] non-personal data for its business purposes.”

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Time to snif out the packets and replace them with cool things like

    “BDSM_training_Gangbang_at_HPHQ_tuesday.pdf”

    And the like. We could even just flood their database until they decide to block us.

  • raynethackery@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Good way to get banned from large corporations. I know my compliance department isn’t going to trust language like that.

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The mere fact that HP is demonstrating they can do this, even if they pinky swear they won’t do it for corporate or business clients means that any business worth their salt will avoid buying HP products.

    • slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I imagine this is only for consumer-grade printers. HP’s business-class devices are usually purchased under a contract.

      • peak_dunning_krueger@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        If anyone seriously believes HP will develop two copies of operating software, one with “send everything to HP” and one without, they are delusional.

        It may very well be that there will be a contract saying something completely different than what is happening in those machines.

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          They absolutely already have multiple types of software, one to exploit consumers and one for enterprise customers.

          Using different software for enterprise customers isn’t even unusual.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Two words: Corporate Espionage.

      Anyone whose business plans overlap with HP’s even a fraction should run for the fucking kills and buy Brothers.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    You’d have to be a complete mental deficient to go out and consciously decide to buy a brand new HP product in 2024. Every single day it’s more bad publicity for HP and yet they don’t receive any consumer backlash that lasts longer than the breath required to complain about it.

    • MrBusiness@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ain’t nobody printing much anymore, just shit companies finding ways to squeeze what customers are left. I got a b&w brother printer years ago and it’s been doin just fine without all the extra “features”. If brother went the way hp is going I wouldn’t have a printer at home anymore.

  • KeriKitty (They(/It))@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I feel like corps have gotten bored with “you will own nothing and you will be happy” and moved on to “you will be owned and you will be happy.” Like, damn, people are absolute livestock in a freaky fucked-up way. You “buy” something and it sits there extracting value from you. You “rent” something and it gets to enjoy the utility you provide, for a time.

    Just seems like “ownership” is totally screwed-up wrong, y’know? One can’t have anything any more, it’s all corporate property they let us pay to install into our own lives for them. grumblegrumblegrumble!

    • Shurimal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      But this is the whole point; for a publicly traded company the people who buy their products are not the customers for whom they create value. Shareholders and investors are the real customers. People who buy the products are precisely just a resource to extract value from for these companies.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Damn HP! My three year old laptop that I mostly de-crappified was just updated with a pop up selling HP extended warranty. They made it look like a system dialog, there was no “quit”, and “send personal data to HP” was selected by default.

    I had to explicitly select to not sending data, explicitly select to make the choice permanent instead of bugging me later, before clicking ok

    Never again HP, never again. It’s so sad to see a formerly great engineering company stooping this low as just another sleazy huckster

  • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The whole printer-as-a-service thing felt odious from the get-go, so the first thing HP should have done was to front a whole lot of good faith: Don’t spy on the customer. Don’t sell the data you get. Encrypt all data that gets passed between printer and HP and don’t look at anything except what is necessary to service the printer.

    That HP couldn’t even make this step seems to imply they don’t care, or assume their customer base is just that easy to abuse, that it has to throw in lease terms, data collection and contrived inconvenience to halt service. That tells us the whole plan was created as a grift from the beginning, rather than a well-intended service that corrupted in time.

    Maybe HP shareholders aren’t using enough lubricant.

    • FightinFalcn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That could be, or alternatively, they could be doing the classic corporate step back. "Oh you didn’t like paying for hardware with limited control AND spying on you at all times? We’re sorry, we will only rent your hardware like we planned, because we listen to you. "

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m still all-in on never owning a HP printer again. I don’t need this in my life

  • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Can someone tell me why this is even necessary? Network printing has existed for almost as long as printers have and doesn’t require the cloud. There are standard protocols for discovering printers on the network and sending prints to them. I’m on Linux, have never installed printer drivers or even manually set up a printer, and I can print just fine over the network, it just knows which device is a printer and I can send prints to it with a single click. It even knows what the printer’s capabilities are, for example whether it can print double sided. Are people so afraid of the system print dialog that they insist on using HP’s app or something?

  • moneyinphx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Unless you are a business getting printers on commercial leases, do yourself a favour and just buy a Brother laser printer and stop having issues with printers and start saving money as well.