• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Serious question not trying to troll here: Isn’t everyone stuck in this hellish capitalist system part of that class?

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      No. Classes are determined by how you get your money and by how comfortable you are.

      If you are working for a paycheck, you do not touch capital.

      • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        If you are working for a paycheck, you do not touch capital.

        Ok so I have my beef with capitalism, for sure, but this is inaccurate. People all over the country own property, shares in public and private companies, shares of government utilities, just to name a few examples.

        Ownership of things does get distributed through capitalism. As manipulated as it is, that’s the concept of the stock market.

        I’m not rich, but I do own a small amount of capital. My net worth far, far exceeds what I have in my bank account when you account for my car that I’ve paid off, small investments that have appreciated over time, stuff like that.

        Now the top of the capitalist class? They have SO MUCH cash, and so many resources to draw on that they can manipulate stock prices and company values at will. That’s where the whole system starts to break down.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          'Ownership of things DOES get distrivuted…"

          Uhhhh, no? Are you dumb? Owning stock in a company is far, FAR removed from owning any part of a company’s assets.

            • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Capital is not money, capital can be represented by money but it is not inherently money. Capital is something you use to buy someone’s labor. More specifically it is the social relationship between wage labor and profit. Assets (private property) used to produce profit (surplus value) are capital

              Capital is “the characteristic the means of production acquire when they are used to hire labor and generate surplus value”

              “Capital is dead labour, that, vampire-like, only lives by sucking living labour, and lives the more, the more labour it sucks.”

      • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s not quite so black and white, though.

        My spouse and I both work for a living, and we’d be in a hard spot if either of us lost our jobs. We also own 3 rental properties, and I have a military pension. We also own a farm where we raise 6 cows and enough chickens to have some eggs to sell.

        So, we get most of our money from our labor, the rental properties pay for themselves most of the time but we don’t pool that with our personal money…it’s for the mortgages, taxes, maintenance and to cover for when we don’t have renters (which is almost never…weird how that happens when you aren’tcharging exploitative rents).

        We sell eggs and make a small profit on those, but not enough to support ourselves…same with the beef…it’s mostly for us and family to eat (because fuck factory farming) but if we don’t have the freezer space we’ll sell the extra as well. That makes us both labor and capital… and my pension and military retirement benefits are basically as close to socialism as we’ll get in the US anytime soon, the biggest difference being I had to earn it.

        • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Based on my definitions. Owning the 3 rental properties makes you owner class as that is private property, also when you pay off the mortgages you are going to be in a great spot right?

          Farms are weird, if you only had the farm and have hired nobody else to help you run it then working class. If you hire people, well then you are owner class.

          You both also have jobs on top of running a farm? Out of curiosity how do you have the time to manage your farm and work at the same time?

    • jmanes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The definitions are tricky based on how you read them, but no. Your role in society is to perform labor (I’m assuming), and the fruits of that labor are then forfeited to those above you for a wage. Thus they have the capital and would belong to the “capitalist class.”

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The actual specific class you belong to can be tricky because there are sub-classes and shit like that but generally speaking you can simplify class dynamics into the owning class (bourgeoisie) and the working class (proletariat). If you own the means of production, the actual property such as land or machinary required to produce things, and you buy others labor to produce these things that you then sell, you are bourgeoisie. If you sell your labor then your are proletariat. You’ll find that the interests of these classes are in opposition; the bourgeois wants to increase profit through any means so as to provide for themselves and for investors while the prole wants a better standard of living, a safe work environment, and less work hours among many other things I need not name. These interest come into direct conflict when the capitalist runs out of ways to externally increase profit controlling a certain market niche, there is only so much demand. When this happens the capitalist looks inward at their company and wonders if they can increase profit through other means like cutting pay, skirting around safety regulations, finding ways to get around providing benefits, cutting pensions, etc etc. The really big bourgeoisie also look towards the legal system, if it only cost them 60mil of lobbying to change a law that makes them billions then that law is dead. The profit motive kills