• Funderpants @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    So if Trump is sitting in jail, found criminally guilty in his indictments, USA today would be justified in what, calling him allegedly guilty, in case he feels like bankrupting them with his money? I find this very hard to beleive.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Once he’s been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court they’ll drop the alleged.

      This isn’t even a Trump specific thing, they use “alleged” or “accused” to refer to any crime committed by anyone that they haven’t been found guilty/liable for. Or will describe them as being arrested for specific charges or a specific incident if that’s what they’re reporting on. But in that case , they’ll refer to them as being arrested for X and then being alleged or accused of X, but not simply that they did X.

      • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        But Trump was found, in multiple courts, to have engaged in an insurrection. He does not need to have a criminal finding of that for it to be true and accepted fact in a court. I’m sorry, but this is a hard disagree from me, when state courts find as a matter of fact that he did engage in an insurrection its not an allegation anymore.