This sounds like a nice step towards modernizing texting, but it’s a shame that Messages doesn’t have an open RCS API to encourage broad adoption across messaging apps.

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The way Google is tacking features onto RCS will only hurt their attempts to make Apple interoperate in the end. iPhones won’t support any of this once their RCS implementation goes live, and there’s nothing as user-hostile as features that work for some accounts but not for others.

    Good for the people using Google’s RCS stuff, I guess, but this will only hurt adoption on the long run.

    • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      will only hurt their attempts to make Apple interoperate…this will only hurt adoption on the long run.

      Any interoperating from Apple will be minimal and begrudging, at best. Google should not hold themselves/their tech and their users back for the distant hope that Apple will be cooperative (because Apple won’t regardless).

      That said, Google really should open up the API.

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Apple implements the normal standards in this case, which is very reasonable. There are plenty of cases where Apple is being a bunch of douchebags, but I don’t see why Apple should be expected to implement Google’s proprietary protocols.

        • Holyginz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ans yet Apple expects all others to to just accept what they want or Apple walls off everything. It goes both ways, Apple doesn’t get to control everything.

          • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            They’re in control of their own services. They could probably disable SMS if they want. Their customers don’t seem to care and those are the only people Apple have something to prove to. I suppose it’d be an unpopular enough measure to make them actually lose sales, but I don’t see what Apple and their users stand to gain from any of this.

            RCS is an international telecommunications standard, used by both Google and mobile carriers. iMessage is more of a WhatsApp-but-built-into-iPhones. One was designed to be implemented by as many devices as possible (which took ages, because carriers and phone makers really didn’t care about RCS, and Google had Hangouts), the other is something Apple invented and provides their users for free.

            Hell, Google could’ve easily brought their Messages app to iOS and bring RCS to Apple’s platform, but they don’t want that.

            The EU has a law that could’ve made Apple open up iMessage, but it turns out iMessage is such a failure over in Europe that they’re not relevant enough to be branded gatekeepers (lol).

            On the American side, at least one important member of the FCC has called for an antitrust investigation following the Beeper Mini story, but as far as I know there’s nothing explicitly illegal about what Apple is doing under current American laws.

            I hope the investigation forces Apple to open up, but Apple doesn’t control anything they haven’t built themselves.

            The right way forward is for Google to stop being like Google, and take the necessary steps to standardise their encryption extensions and any other features they may or may not have planned. Right now, Google is turning Google Messages into just another iMessage, and that’s solves absolutely nothing. They don’t open source the messenger app on their open source operating system anymore!

            • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Have you looked into running your own RCS server or connecting to existing RCS servers? As far as I can tell, it’s proprietary infrastructure built on top of an open standard.

              RCS just lets the servers talk to each other, and there is no reference implementation for a server. On the off chance that you do manage to write your own implementation, it’s unlikely that Google or Samsung’s servers would be willing to talk to yours unless you’re a telecom.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The better solution is to move away from proprietary messaging apps altogether. Simplex Chat, Jami, Session and signal all support both Android and iOS.

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Perhaps, but iMessage is a pretty good protocol all together. You shouldn’t need to install an app to be able to use secure messaging.

        I don’t know anyone who users either Simplex, Jami, or Session. Signal is nice, but it’s closed-off network isn’t great. I’d much rather see XMPP or Matrix take off, but those lack good apps.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Signal has third party apps like Molly. iMessage only works on Iphones and is utterly proprietary and locked down which makes it a bad option for most people.

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    How far back are they gonna allow? Like, I need to edit the evidence level or oops I misspelled that last message level?

    • FlatFootFox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thirty minutes. So mostly misspelled words. Most implementations of this type of feature also have a small “Edited” flag.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Well there goes another reliable source of evidence. I’m hoping that we don’t end up making everything into discord where people can flat out brag about how they’re abusing kids in their basement and then delete when law enforcement comes around (Yes I actually saw that happen)

  • limerod@reddthat.comM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    How about a proper backup system? I literally lost access to a group chat just because I changed phones. None of the RCS group chats migrated. Until, they fix the usability and reliability issues it will remain inferior with low usage.

    Plus, whose stupid idea was it to remove the auto sort groups in message organisation? I had tabs for OTP, banking, personal, promotion, chats separated; Which was much better than the default clusterfuck you call now.

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Or the fact that even enabled, the rcs does not switch to SMS when rcs is magically unavailable. They just don’t send until legitimately 16 hrs later.