psychothumbs@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoWant to watch porn in Britain? Get your passport readywww.politico.euexternal-linkmessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkWant to watch porn in Britain? Get your passport readywww.politico.eupsychothumbs@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square68fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareDonut@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoI agree that it’s a slippery slope, but what does this have to do with freedom of speech?
minus-squareyildolw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoSmut is speech. Frankly, smut is the highest form of speech. You should not need to show your papers to speak or to listen
minus-squareDonut@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoIs that a legal definition or your personal interpretation?
minus-squarermuk@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoIf it’s a legal definition then that’s the problem.
minus-squareDonut@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoIf you want to start talking to lawmakers about wanting to watch porn without having to show ID, you would be dismissed if you’re going to cite free speech being the right it is infringing upon. Privacy would be a better starting point, for example.
minus-squareieatpillowtags@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoThat’s your personal interpretation. I think you’re full of shite and so does Larry Flint.
I agree that it’s a slippery slope, but what does this have to do with freedom of speech?
Smut is speech. Frankly, smut is the highest form of speech. You should not need to show your papers to speak or to listen
Is that a legal definition or your personal interpretation?
If it’s a legal definition then that’s the problem.
If you want to start talking to lawmakers about wanting to watch porn without having to show ID, you would be dismissed if you’re going to cite free speech being the right it is infringing upon. Privacy would be a better starting point, for example.
That’s your personal interpretation. I think you’re full of shite and so does Larry Flint.