• Hyperlon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’d rather not refuel in -20F weather on a single trip. Add in a trailer and a road trip becomes a charging trip with intermittent driving.

      • Hyperlon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You do what you want. But I’ll make my infrastructure decisions based on my edge cases. Others will as well. Sometimes those edge cases are important to people.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Good thing we make decisions based on something that happens for a few days out of the entire year.

      • Hyperlon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        This isn’t like the consequences of adding a water filter means you now have to change a water filter every year, this is something that would turn a vacation into something unenjoyable. Meaning it’s a decision that would make you give up that type of vacation if that’s your only car. It’s a sacrifice not an inconvenience.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          See the math here: https://midwest.social/comment/6976296

          You have to look for incredibly specific situations in North America for current EVs to not be able to make a stretch of road. So much so that many ICE cars would fail at it. We do need better charging infrastructure. Better batteries are desirable for many other reasons, but not required.

          • Hyperlon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Trailers have a habit of cutting the range by 66%. Someone I know has an EV and tows their bikes to a nearby city. They have to charge mid trip in both directions. That’s unacceptable to me and a lot of others. I’m fine with a vehicle with 300 miles of range. But 100 miles of range to tow a boat? I wouldn’t make it back without a recharge. Probably two charges because charging stations wouldn’t be anywhere near the lake in rural areas. So in that scenario I would have to give up boating for an electric vehicle because I’m not about to do that.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              The towing range of an F150 Lightning is actually twice as far as its ICE cousin.

              We’re also not fully utilizing the possibilities of trailers yet. They can bring extra battery. We just need the hookups to make it happen. The aerodynamic cost is already paid by having a trailer, and extra weight is less meaningful for highway travel.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yep. People in the city, EVs are fine. For those of us who haul or have to drive farther than 20 miles it becomes an issue. It’s not there just yet for us. I’m still holding out for hydrogen ICE motors.

      • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Where do you get the idea from that an EV only has 20 miles of range? Have you ever even seen an EV let some driven one?

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Uhh where did I say that they only had 20 mile range? I said for those of us who have a drive that’s farther than 20miles one way. Most of people who travel usually do 45-60 miles just going to and from work daily. Then you add in errands, the range needs to be better.