"Well, if I were him I’d want to debate me too. He’s got nothing else to do.”

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Biden shows up to the debate wearing his aviator glasses and leaves them on the whole time.

  • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    He’s is so transparently desperate to put Haley in the rear-view mirror.

    And he’s already told us what he’s going to do to get out of debating with Biden: He’s going to insist that none of the traditional debates be held and instead they all must be Trump campaign events hosted by his sycophants rather than independently run debates. When he doesn’t get his way he’s going claim Biden didn’t want to debate him.

        • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The worst thing for Republican voter turnout is hearing a Bernie Sanders speech. The dude shows up in a coal miner town hall and convinces them all to vote blue.

      • Mnemnosyne@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s a shame it didn’t happen…maybe, just maybe, if Bernie had trounced Trump in a debate, there wouldn’t have been that whole Bernie is unelectable/would lose to Trump idea floating so strongly, and it might’ve given him a better chance in the primary either time.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          At this point I see debates as pointless.

          There may have been a time in this country where candidate A would have this plan for healthcare, candidate B would have that plan for healthcare, candidate A calls for more trade with Europe, candidate B favors trade with Asia etc. and issues are discussed.

          These days, there’s one political party and one doomsday cult. I don’t think it’s worth the bandwidth to broadcast.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It wouldn’t have mattered. The “unelectable” narrative was coming from the DNC leadership. Bernie was polling just fine until everyone started saying he couldn’t win.

          • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I remember all the networks showing the number of delegates he and Hillary had, and they showed all the super delegates going to Hillary. Not only had they never shown votes like that before, but the super delegates hadn’t even voted at that point. It was all just based off the assumption that they would all vote for Hillary. Thumb on the scale.

            • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Hillary had bought their support from the beginning. She learned from 2008 that she couldn’t compete in an open field, so she wrangled all challengers before the primaries started. Sanders was the only one who couldn’t be bought.

            • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Thumb on the scale.

              That’s the whole point of super delegates. The consequence in 2016 being that Hillary only needed about 30% in a given primary to “win” that state.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’ll seriously consider debating you once - no, I’m sorry: IF - you win the Republican Primary.

      Can you imagine how fucking infuriating that would be to Trump?

  • ZK686@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Congratulations America, we have 2 old, white men running for President…AGAIN…

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Are you… new here? George Washington was elected at age 57. It took until 1850 for there to be a president who was born in the 1800s. It took until 1961 for a president to be born in the 1900s.

      Donald Trump is older than both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. Before them we literally had presidents born in the 1920s. Reagan was born before WW1!

      Obama was the outlier. Fucking vote in every election if you don’t like it.

  • Pavidus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m torn. On one hand, debates should take place to show knowledge/professionalism/action plans, etc. Also, it showcases (yet again) what a fucking idiot he is. On the other hand, he hasn’t done a debate so far for this presidential race, so why start now? It’s been nice hearing about him slightly less.

    Also…how the fuck are debates not somehow mandatory to end up in the presidential race?

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Neither has officially won their party’s respective nominations. There is plenty of time, and there will be debates.

      • Pavidus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The primaries are what I was referring to. I understand there’s time for actual candidate debates.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh then yeah, I agree with you, Trump and Haley should debate. I’m not sure anything is gained having Biden debate any challengers.

    • deft@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      debates haven’t been legit for decades and since then they progressively get worse

    • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      On the other hand, he hasn’t done a debate so far for this presidential race

      It is way too early for R vs. D debates. Why would Biden debate him? Biden is handily beating Dean Phillips. Trump needs to defeat Haley first. It’s not Biden fault Haley is still in it.

  • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s not really a debate when your opponent’s metrics for winning is simply to speak more loudly, more aggressively, and to refuse to shut the fuck up more intensely than anybody else in the room.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Okay, but that’s basically every debate. Hell, that’s the optimal strategy in a crowded field. Meekly sitting in the back with a pile of spreadsheets that say “I’m right” on them does nothing to galvenize public support for your policies.

      Even then, Biden refusing to meet Trump on stage won’t discourage Trump from doing his whistle stop Beer Hall tour. At some point, I think liberals lose sight of how important big crowds of people cheering at your approach is in a popularity contest. When Biden shows up at an event, he’s greeted by a few dozen angry protesters, calling him Genocide Joe and waving big blown up pictures of dead Palestinian children. When Trump shows up at an event, he’s greeted by a few dozen enthusiastic supporters, calling him the New Messiah and waving big blown up pictures of drowned children in the Rio Grande with “Win One More For the Gipper” scrawled across it.

      Totally different energy at these events. Totally different reception by the party’s base voters.

      If Biden wants to position himself as the “Guy Who Will Protect You From Trump Who Is Worse”, he’s going to have to get out in front of an audience, side by side with Trump, and remind everyone of the distinction. Otherwise, he’s just running in a vacuum as a mediocre President during an economic upswing, and hoping people give him credit for a rising stock market without blaming him for his party’s failure to deliver on any of their major platforms in the last 40 years.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Did you miss the 2020 election when Trump had more people at his rallies than now? Biden had zero rallies because of the pandemic and won easily. Rallies don’t matter.

  • Xhieron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    If it weren’t for the fact that this shit has real consequences, I’d suggest Biden should invite Haley to debate the president just for spite.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    it’s never a debate. I’ve never seen one that was a debate. Trump would ignore the questions, say edgy shit and get laughs, and basically win

    Biden is right to not platform an insurrectionist

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh good. We’re at the “debate me, bro” phase. Love to see it. Lol

    I sincerely hope Biden never takes a single debate with him, because it would be an absolute clown show, and that’s exactly the kind of chaos Trump’s brand thrives upon.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Trump lost every general election debate he has been in, including two against Biden. I don’t know why people forget he’s actually really bad at staying on message and declaring succinct points in response to specific questions, especially when he gets riled up.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because he makes a spectacle and enough sound bites to get the press and his supporters talking.

        He makes noise, they like that he makes noise, so they like him. They dont care too much about what the noise is.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s true, but people in his camp want a spectacle, an entertaining show, not policy plans and actual governance. Putting Trump up there with Biden gives him implicit credence that he’s worth debating, while Biden will be the punchline of his boorish antics.

        It’s true that he would lose every debate point, yet he would still come out on top because of the giant figurative megaphone he would get.

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Right or wrong, a president can’t skip debates. That’s a non-starter, no matter who he/she’s debating against.

    Having said that, it would be an absolute shit show both ways, one struggling to talk coherently, the other ones spewing epic levels of bullshit, and most likely nothing of value coming of it at all.

    But stil, having a presidential election without any debates would be the final nail in the coffin of America, as it’s supposed to be.

    • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Right or wrong, a president can’t skip debates.

      Why not? There is no law requiring participation to be on the ballot. Strategically its a bad move. Morally it’s a bad move.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Why not?

        Because we Citizens need ways to evaluate the people who are running for office to decide which one you want to give her a vote to.

        Name one presidential election cycle where no debates were done in modern times.

        Morally it’s a bad move.

        It would be immoral for someone running for office to not put themselves up for evaluation via debates. No one is owed blind loyalty.

        • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Because we Citizens need ways to evaluate the people who are running for office to decide which one you want to give her a vote to.

          You’ve had plenty of time to do so for both candidates, as both have recently held office.

          Name one presidential election cycle where no debates were done in modern times.

          This is moving the goal posts, and a bad way to evaluate the necessity of a given debate.

          It would be immoral for someone running for office to not put themselves up for evaluation via debates. No one is owed blind loyalty.

          I’m not suggesting blind loyalty. It just seems odd that your trying to say the public won’t have a chance to evaluate the options when that clearly isn’t the case. Trump held office from 2016 to 2020, Biden from 2020 to 2024.

          If anybody doesn’t already know what these guys are about, then a debate won’t solve that, as they already pay too little attention.

          And besides that, the immorality of platforming insurectionists far outweighs whatever immorality could arrive in the form your suggesting.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I want to see Biden call him an Insurrectionist. Preferably to his face.

      a spade is a spade, even if it’s not proven in a court of law.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I guarantee you will see it if Trump doesn’t run away from debates when it’s actually time. Both Hillary and Biden managed to knock him off kilter with on-message insults like that. We’re 50/50 to getting NO INSURRECTIONIST NO INSURRECTIONIST YOU’RE THE INSURRECTIONIST