• Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    If election theater motivates this policy and makes this happen then I’m all for it. I wonder what our criminal AG in Texas thinks about all this, considering he’s trying to do the opposite in cities with lax marijuana enforcement.

    • Urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Even if marijuana was descheduled, it would still be illegal due to Texas state law

      I think most states in which it is illegal would remain illegal. Many states would probably update their laws in response to the DEA descheduling it.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Many states would probably update their laws in response to the DEA descheduling it.

        Importantly too, they’d have to police it using their own state resources.

      • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Many states have laws based on the federal schedule and don’t specifically name any drugs, so there would be some immediate effects.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        If the law only references federal definitions of scheduled drugs, they would need to update their laws before this went into effect or else risk letting the population have legal weed for a short window, which likely would spur voters to try and regain their newly found drug

        • Urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Right, which is why I bothered to link Texas law, which references by name.

          My own state references it by name. I suspect many/most state marijuana laws predate the formation of the DEA but I’m not a historian/lawyer.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sure texas is covered, but we got a lot of states. A ton are going to need proactive laws or else risk kicking a hornets nest in an election year

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Biden does good thing

      Idiots: “He’s only doing this to get votes!”

      Yeah, no shit sherlock, that’s the whole point of the system.