• rayyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Most porn viewers are in red states but we all know they are above the law, so it’s good

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In Deevers’ view, civil society, apart from the influence of overt Christian doctrine, is not a neutral middle ground, but rather the realm of the devil, or what he calls “a serpentine theocracy.”

    But when Deevers opens his mouth, he invariably presents a jarring, black-and-white view of the role of government — which he believes exists to “protect innocent people and to punish and terrorize evildoers.”

    While campaigning, Deevers told a religious podcast he also favors “public shaming for those who are at fault in divorce.” (In a related essay, he calls this “an important act of justice for both the transgressor and the transgressed.”)

    Deevers embodies a threat that experts believe Christian nationalism poses to democracy — by literally demonizing his opponents, and casting compromise as moral corruption.

    As Brad Onishi, author of an “Extremist History of Christian Nationalism,” recently described in an interview with Rolling Stone: “If you’re a person who is convinced that the United States is under threat by a Luciferian regime, comprised of Marxist globalist secularists, feminists, the LGBTQ community, and so on, democracy is not your sacred value.”

    Pitching himself to voters, Deevers filmed a campaign ad wielding a rifle while wearing a black T-shirt that read: “Obey God: Defy Tyrants.” He railed against “the Godless leftist agenda” that he warned threatens “thriving families and their moral development.” He additionally decried “drag queen story hour” and the “chemical and surgical mutilation of our kids.” A longtime opponent of abortion, Deevers positioned this stance in biblical terms as “loving my pre-born neighbor as myself.”


    The original article contains 1,420 words, the summary contains 259 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well guess I’m getting the death penalty. You can have my porn when you pry it from my cold dead hands.

    • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      No. Traditionally, people were nosey as hell! This is one instance of a conservative actually being conservative.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The cons are all essentially puritanical.

        Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.

        Combine that fear with their projection - because they are up to all kinds of freaky stuff themselves, most likely and that spells conservative.

  • tygerprints@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh lord another “christian nationalist” nutjob with severe mental problems. If he wants to persecute evildoers, he needs to start by putting a clamp over his own monsterous mouth.

    It is NOT morality to condemn pornography. In fact, I believe it’s far more idiotic and immoral not to watch “porn” (which I wish didn’t have a name with such negative connotations to it). People put effort and money into making that s#it for our enjoyment (mostly us males, I admit, but it’s there for everyone to enjoy).

    They found cave paintings in Lescoux that show cavemen sex with animals and other humans, including kids. My point here is that “porn,” which is a term that usually just refers to sexual congress between human beings, has existed FOR A REASON as long as human beings have been around.

    I know it’s not fashionable, “christian,” or polite to make a statement supporting the viewing of sexual pleasure as a necessary part of life, but I hold with Larry Flynt’s view of “relax people, it’s JUST sex.” The idea that human sexuality is sinful is perhaps the most evil idea ever perpetrated by man.

    The one impulsive, pleasurable and inexpensive joy we have being labelled a sin and wrong is, to me, the real crime here. I’m not saying porn doesn’t sometimes create victims, but for every instance of that, there are billions more who enjoy it and are not harmed but in fact are uplifted and given a healthy outlet because of it.

    Something to think about - just sayin’.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They found cave paintings in Lescoux that show cavemen sex with animals and other humans, including kids.

      Wait really? I can’t find a source for that. This source says there’s only one human drawing in there, with a bird’s head. Are you thinking of another cave?

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Exactly. Their little book club rules are for them, not for me. They can fuck right off with that nonsense.

    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      This dude definitely watches porn, and is most likely into the weirdest fetishes.

      It’s unusually the ones that bring this shit up that have the most experience in this department.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Are any of his views backed up by Jesus?

      I’m no religious scholar, and I’m aware the Bible is so full of vauge and conflicting statements that it’s possible to cherry pick a verse that agrees with literally any worldview, but let me cherry pick a few that this man must interpret differently than me.

      John 8:1-11 Religious leaders bring Jesus a woman who has commited adultery and asks if he agrees with religious laws that state she should be stoned to death. His response is the often quoted “let any one of you who is without sin cast the first stone”.

      Luke 7:36-50 Jesus is dinning at the home of a religious leader. A prostitute enters and washes the feet of Jesus with her tears and hair. He explains to the religious leader that this woman has shown him great love because he has forgiven her of great sins. However, the religious leader has shown Jesus no love. Jesus explains “Those who have been forgiven of little, love little”.

      I’d argue Jesus would be against jailing people for watching porn if he so easily forgave adultery and prostitution.

      • Carvex@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Probably? This is textbook for these people. Every accusation from Conservatives is an admission of guilt.

      • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        In this case, the law could potentially give green light to CP as long as it’s between married couples, as

        1. it has an exception for married couples,
        2. it does not differentiate between porn of consenting adults and of children who cannot consent.

        After seeing many laws that are written in a way they have other effects that are “totally unintended”, I refuse to believe this guy isn’t aware the pedo part of his law. I usually oppose pedojacketing, but in this case it’s not unwarranted.

        • Uranium3006@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Federal CP law would still apply, and Christian morality and pratice is already sexually abusive to children even when they’re not outright assaulting them (which also happens a lot)

    • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Jesus lived in a region conquered by the Roman Empire. Many of his fans at the time wanted him to be a conquering ruler and overthrow them. His answer in the text amounted to, “that’s not why I’m here.” Nominal Christians trying to install a Christian Government have missed the point of their own text so hard it’s actually kinda funny.

      Jesus: Share resources among those that need them, it’s very hard for rich people to enter heaven.

      His Followers: Temporarily embarrassed billionaires who idolize wealth and build literal golden statues of their favorite rich guy.

      Jesus: Hangs out with tax collectors (i.e., agents of the Romans, who were not popular), hookers, low status foreigners, and people with terminal diseases.

      His Followers: Ew, drag queens and brown people. Gross.

      Jesus: Encourages non-violent responses to his own capture pending execution. Tells many parables about forgiveness and treating foreigners as neighbors.

      His Followers: Immigrants are invading us! They terk our jerbs! BOMB IRAN!

      Anyone seeing a pattern here? The reality is that Christianity isn’t really a belief system for them, it’s a cultural identity or tribal marker. You don’t have to actually believe any of this shit or behave accordingly. All you have to do is say the right words and present the right image. Right wing Evangelical Christianity is a hollowed out husk; an empty aesthetic presenting as a belief system that promises that anything you do will be wiped away if you say the right words and give money to whatever charlatan is giving his Dollar General Ted Talk today.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think you’re a hell of a lot closer than most Christians, but my read through was different when it came to Rome

        Like when they asked if they should pay the tax collector. He asked who’s head was on the coin, and said “give unto Cesar what is Caesar’s”. My teacher said that means pay your taxes… That’s a pretty strained reason

        What he was saying is “let’s just share among each other, then coin means nothing to us”. He was advocating dropping out of the Roman economy

        He also preached that if you have excess, you share it generously - so no huge stockpiles of grain to be seized.

        And it was like this across the board - we don’t need temples, it’s enough to share a meal. We don’t need the holy of holies or complex bathing rituals - here’s a new ritual that only requires a bit of water

        We don’t need leaders, if we all focus on serving each other everything will fall into place.

        If Romans demand work from you, use their laws and customs against them. Make it frustrating to deal with you while giving them no justification to draw a sword

        It all fits together nicely. It’s not about religion - everything he said on that topic boils down to “you’ve mistaken our laws for the meaning behind them and they’ve become a reason to do evil. At the core, it’s just be good to each other, everything flows from there”

        Jesus was a revolutionary. He sought to free his people not as a heroic warlord, but by making them unprofitable and frustrating. He was removing the weaknesses of his people. If you have no leaders, there’s no one to hold hostage. If you hold the spirit of the law above it’s wording, the religious leaders couldn’t demand obedience through religion. If you give away your money freely and have no big stores of food or wealth, there’s nothing for them to take. There’s no handle to control them, and there’s no profit in raiding them

        And that’s why he died - it seems very clear to me that Judas didn’t betray him - he followed Jesus’s plan. Jesus warned them all it was about to happen, and told them not to resist. Judas didn’t want the silver, he felt enough guilt/grief to take his own life.

        Jesus himself was the last weakness, so he had to die. Or at least stage his death - he was very popular among the legions very soon after his death. Maybe he had inside help from his executioners, he was up on the cross for a very short time (granted, he was probably on the verge of death already)

        Unfortunately, it still had one weakness… The Romans straight up brutally massacred his peaceful followers

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        This is a big reason why I think people who want to abolish religion all together miss the point. The issue is not that the text is so dark and vile it breaks brains… When taken in its proper historical context and read properly, it’s actually quite based.

        The issue is that humans are stupid, violet, tribal beasts who will take any symbol and use it to bang their drum. If religion didn’t exist the world would be just as shitty, only now humans would be worshipping The Beatles and claiming Beatles music was all about keeping the black man down and praying away the gay.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      About half

      Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Hell is not real, bring fucked up from that idea is real.

              Look, I don’t want anyone’s pity and I don’t particularly want to get into it so I will keep it short. I have been an atheist since 2018. I still have issues with the belief in hell and it fucking hurts. Even with secular therapy I don’t think I will ever fully recover.

              You can change laws but you can’t undo the damages the doctrine of hell has done to the human race.

              On the plus side I got to be very proud of my ten year old daughter when someone told her about hell and she brought up very good questions about it. Love my little free thinkers.

    • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      There was one person the Knowledge Fight guys did a break episode on who wanted to make porn illegal. After getting pretty far into the episode Dan finally reveals what he eventually found out after the guy mentions people having legal issues:

      His son got caught with (already illegal) child porn, and it hurt his sons career options. So this man’s idea is to ban all porn… despite the reason for his tirade being already illegal. He just wants to harm everyone else too, lashing out.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        His son got caught with (already illegal) child porn, and it hurt his sons career options. So this man’s idea is to ban all porn… despite the reason for his tirade being already illegal.

        He probably thinks regular porn is a “gateway drug” to more extreme porn, eventually culminating in what his son was caught with. This isn’t a super uncommon view, and isn’t even limited to weird fundies or even the right. I don’t agree with it personally, but I’ve seen it enough times from people on enough sides that I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s part of that crowd.

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Random prisoner: “Whatch’ya in for?”

      Avg. Joe: “Beating it”

      Random prisoner: “Ain’t no way you’re gonna last till parole”

  • kd45@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    So is this like a person that actually matters or just some retarded american yokel the media is using for clickbait?