• plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I really hate this “quietly deleting” / “quietly removing” trend in news headlines. Politico’s don’t “publicly announce” things they want to stop talking about, so it’s always going to be “quietly”. It’s not like their teams have to go into some secret room/SCIFF to remove a paragraph of text on a web page…

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Seems quiet to me, in a metaphorical sense, if they delete something from PR page which they previously considered important enough to have as a campaign position, but without articulating a new position. They are obscuring their position.

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s emphasizing that they would prefer people not find out about it, which is different to regular deleting.

      • Lojcs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I don’t think people delete things intending for them to be found out in general

        Edit: I think the ‘silent’ part refers to them continuing the rethoric on twitter while deleting from the website

    • CodeName@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can hate it if you want, I guess, but isn’t that what they are doing? They know the polls are against them so they are flip flopping, to use Repub terms, but doing so in a cowardly fashion hoping no one will notice. But we’ve all noticed.

      How would you frame these types of stories?