Polls show Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 are more likely to agree that Israel is committing genocide in besieged Gaza than other age groups in the country.
Overall, we rate Brooking Institution Left-Center biased based on donations to primarily Democratic candidates and policy advocacy that slightly favors the left. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to strong sourcing and a clean fact check record.
I presented a reliable source and you refuse to look at it. Do you have problems with the guardian as well?
Among younger Americans, and along political lines, divisions are more prominent. Almost half of those surveyed aged 18-29, 49%, say Israel is committing genocide, with 24% disagreeing and 27% uncertain.
I’ll click a guardian link, thanks. Is there a reason you chose to post a much worse source for this information? I, along with others here, refuted your source. Why not post the guardian article in the beginning?
I don’t see why presenting another worse source reinforces anything. I might come away with the impression that if a worse source is also saying the same thing that the information might be suspect.
I don’t think that addresses what I said, and you don’t have to read what I post either, but I would hope you’d understand that presenting information from dubious sources is not a good way to get ideas across.
Already posted evidence, bad source is bad.
Right and then refused to look at further evidence.
You should be able to find this information presented by a reliable source, like I did.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/brookings-institute/
I presented a reliable source and you refuse to look at it. Do you have problems with the guardian as well?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/24/americans-believe-israel-committing-genocide-poll
I’ll click a guardian link, thanks. Is there a reason you chose to post a much worse source for this information? I, along with others here, refuted your source. Why not post the guardian article in the beginning?
Posted the Guardian link previously. This just reinforced the Guardian story.
Free to block me if you don’t like the way I post. My feelings won’t be hurt.
I don’t see why presenting another worse source reinforces anything. I might come away with the impression that if a worse source is also saying the same thing that the information might be suspect.
I would think the guardian article would suffice.
To reiterate, you don’t have to read my posts.
I don’t think that addresses what I said, and you don’t have to read what I post either, but I would hope you’d understand that presenting information from dubious sources is not a good way to get ideas across.