let’s gooo

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wow, a news story that makes me think my kid could actually live in a better political climate than me in a few decades. I forgot what this feeling was like.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Bro, I’ll tell you the same thing I was told as a young guy in my career. I’m in my 40’s now and this was about 20 years ago. An older guy about to retire said something like ‘ya know, everyone always says that the younger generation is lazy, or dumb, but from what I noticed you guys are doing it smarter and you’ll be better than us.’ I kinda thought that, but it was nice to hear.

      Now I’ll say about 10 years ago, I was recruiting in high school and those kids were leaps and bounds ahead of where my generation was. It was crazy how much they could socialize across cliques and it not matter. Now that I am in my 40’s I have some family members in high school, and I just see them being better. I don’t know how this will translate into the work force or a fight for a labor reform, but I think we need to be more open to their ideas than our elder generations were to us.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I think the generation currently entering adulthood is seeing enough bullshit that they might do a great job leading this country, as long as they get a chance.

    • vimdiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why do you think the GQP is panicing. Demographics are changing and they can’t rely on old white male voters to shift the tide because they’re all dying. Covid put a dent in them too.

    • markon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m voting for Biden unless there’s another nominee that will be the predominant choice against Trump. I don’t like either of them but the choice is easy. Biden can’t win my state, but I’m still going to vote for him literally just because he is running against Trump. I might cow about how I ate the Dems won’t run on much else, but the contrast is big this time. It’s always been really though, the Dems should be our new right wing party and a new farther left party like the Green party ought to be the more leftist faction. Dems to me already are neolibs with a neocon leaning. Leftist Populism must be embraced by the neolibs long term. Either way something has to give. Too much wealth to go around (even globally). The greedy old ideologies of constant growth at the expense of the poorest people in the world can’t go forever. Growth economics can’t go forever either. I have hope. Just go vote because that’s what we can do easily as a minimum effort.

      • Clbull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Biden 100% needs our energy right now. Trump will turn America into the Fourth Reich.

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The neoliberals won’t embrace anything unless there’s profit in it.

        Preferential voting is the only chance of a progressive gaining the power they need to make desperately overdue changes to healthcare, worker rights, housing, cost of living, etc.

        A neoliberal government that occasionally panders to progressives is better than a neoliberal government that gets horny at the idea of spitting in poor peoples faces, which is better than fascists.

        But we need to do so much more than “not making things worse”.

  • Copernican@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It’s weird. As a millennial in college I would always hear the grief from gen x hearing me complain and respond with “well get out an vote then.” I guess it is now my turn to tell that to a younger generation, watch them get upset, and then eat my popcorn in 20 years while I watch gen lecture the next generation on the importance of voting.

    But I do think this is alarming:

    Before the 2020 election, 57% of Americans ages 18 to 29 said they were planning to vote. The number is now 49%, a figure many analysts say reflects disinterest in the likelihood of a Biden-Trump rematch.

    I think the US would be a better place if we had compulsory voting laws similar to Australia that gets like 90 percent turnout. As a citizen of a democracy I think voting should be an obligation. And as a member of a democracy I wish the majority vote actually was a number that is a majority of Americans, not just Americans that voted, so we could have more faith in the outcomes actually reflecting the will of the people.

    • jennwiththesea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      So help them vote. Volunteer with efforts to get out the youth vote. Push for universal mail in voting where you are, or at least early voting. Help get politicians and initiatives on the ballot that they actually care about.

      Shaming and complaining about the demographic you want to reach accomplishes nothing.

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Obligatory-

        If you are a legal resident of Wisconsin, and are not currently serving time or on paper, you can register to vote entirely online if you want, and you can request absentee ballots for all elections for the entire year (no reason needed, but necessary annual renewal, it’s my New Year’s resolution every year because it’s so easy to accomplish. entirely free of charge ofc.).

        Just go to www.myvote.wi.gov to register, request absentee ballots, check your registration, or find your polling place. If you have any difficulty with your registration, you can find your local rep and contact them directly.

        Please vote. Please vote for your own wellbeing. Please.

        Edits to fix link redirect per convo below

        • flames5123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          This is why I love Washington. Everyone has an OPT OUT absentee ballot. Everyone gets one at your address. Every election. All the time. The same address that’s on your ID. It’s amazing.

      • Resonosity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve been helping my fellow zoomers by figuring out what their townships/town wards/city districts are, then what their local/state/federal legislative/executive/judicial districts are, then who’s running for what position, then where to vote and (primaries and generals).

        Information is power!

      • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I hope things will change, but we still have abysmal turnout. TX started allowing early voting over 40 years ago and we still struggle to get people to the polls. Early voting is a span of 2 weeks, where in the 1st week, polls are required to be open for at least 9 hours and can be open from 6 AM to 10 PM on the weekday and shortened hours on the weekend, and in the 2nd week, polls are required to be open at least 12 hours a day and typically have the same hours as election day. Yet we still have virtually no lines through all early voting and a massive line on election day.

        It doesn’t help that the news only bangs the final day of voting into peoples’ heads.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Many Republicans vote exactly on election day because they are being fed lies that early voting and mail in voting are riddled with fraud.

        • moitoi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It doesn’t work. Every swiss citizen older than 18 receives them at home. The younger generation doesn’t vote.

          I’m older now and the older I’m the more people of my age around me vote. It’s depressing. I try each time to make the younger vote but it’s not working. And, I didn’t miss one. Next one is the 3rd March. I will try again.

          Don’t take me wrong if I convince if just one younger person, it’s a win.

  • mydude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The similarities between sexual freedom and religious freedom is striking. Sexual attraction and identification is important to be free and open, just like religious freedom. Free from persecution, equal rights and oppertunities.

    But I don’t like when people forcefully spread their belief system and their values to others. Let it be organic, don’t try to force change. People are free to pursue their lifestyle and i’m free to pursue mine. In today’s society, it feels like the ownerclass are running pro lgbtq advertisements. Is it another divide and conquer technique? The whole thing feels forced…

    Please don’t downvote just because it’s an unpopular opinion, rather lets discuss the issue 👍

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      it feels like the ownerclass are running pro lgbtq advertisements

      Corporations make inclusive advertisement when it makes them more money than not doing so. You can easily see the same movie studios making fairly different advertisement in EU/USA than in China/Saudi Arabia. This is virtue signalling, but I’m fine with it, because when good values get virtue signalled in public, the opposite values are less likely to transmit. They don’t have good intentions, but good results come out of it.

      There are also less common cases where they purposefully make over the top stunts because it will make far right nutjobs angry, which they count as free advertisement.

      • mydude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        “This is virtue signalling, but I’m fine with it, because when good values get virtue signalled in public, the opposite values are less likely to transmit. They don’t have good intentions, but good results come out of it.”

        US Supreme Court has upheld the ban on religious ads, and my initial comparison between religion and sexual freedom runs deeper. They are very comparable. Both have been persecuted heavily up in history. A big difference is what I posted in a different sub-thread

        “Even though I’m an atheist or agnostic, not really sure. Religion is different because they are on both the giving and the recieving end of persecution.They use religion as a base for their persecution of other people of a different religion (or sexual identification, sexual attraction, even something as trivial as dress code). Expressions that are clearly protected within the law.”

        Religion within ads are not protected by freedom of expression (acc. to US SC), and a sexual expression as an ad has not, to my knowledge, been challenged in the courts (yet). Correct me if I’m wrong.

        “There are also less common cases where they purposefully make over the top stunts because it will make far right nutjobs angry, which they count as free advertisement.”

        It’s like burning books or flags, it’s a protected form of expression. Even though these actions are very divisive. I will fight for even these, and the ones you put as examples’ right to express themselves. It’s very much like Noam Chomsky says: “If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all.”

      • conorm@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        so you like creating (and when corps create) echo-chambers when they fit the concepts that you want? with all respect possible to give, your logic is therefore not sound

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Once the hateful boomers die out, the republican party will be finished. They know this and is why they have been focusing on voter suppression so much.

    • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      They nearly overrode the vote last time around. They faced no consequences and they’re very close to being in a position to do it again and make lasting changes to seize power forever. Nothing good is guaranteed.

      And they’re rewriting education including made up history to ensure that more kids are conservative in future generations. Things aren’t looking good.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        They faced no consequences

        Except the 200+ people who were convicted and are currently sitting in jail.

        And, as cynical as we might be, we have to remember that Trump’s various trials are not over yet.

        • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ues. The pawns were convicted and the people with actual power faced no consequences. The ringleader could very well be elected president where he ignored the law consistently. His trials keep getting delayed and the corrupt judge he appointed keeps helping him. It’s very scary times.

      • proudblond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Hopefully the Democrats. No seriously, I hope the Dems become our more conservative party and we get a more progressive party. But… I’m not holding my breath, honestly. Feels like wishful thinking.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        A new party will pop up. The Federalist Party died out after Hamilton was shot and also the War of 1812. They fielded their last Presidential candidate in 1816 with 30.9% of the vote.

        Then the National Republican Party (different from the current Republican party) evolved out of the Democratic-Republican Party.

        Personally, I’d love it if Democrats became the right-most party by staying exactly as they are, and a new party breaks off of them or evolves out to their left.

        • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Democrats aren’t exactly a healthy representation of moderation. They’re too authoritarian for me to want the other party to be the actually-socialist party. Socialist and libertarian would be a balance, but it requires a big chunk of the Democrat platform to burn alongside MAGA. Honestly actually-socialist and actually-libertarian would be the two parties we really need today.

          • Delta_V@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            actually-socialist and actually-libertarian would be the two parties we really need today

            they’re the same party

            • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Which one is that? I’m not sure you understand the difference if you think both can possibly be represented by the same party.

    • FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I remember seeing this comment on Digg while people speculated that W would be the last republican president elected for a generation.

      • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If the US president got elected by getting the most votes, there wouldn’t have been a Republican since Bush senior. I really don’t understand why electoral reform is not higher on the political agenda in the US.

        • Lad@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The Democratic party and Republican party are united in their opposition to electoral reform because they both benefit the most from it.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Having it based purely on a popular vote will still wind up with a 2 party system. Ranked voting needs to be implemented. All of the benefits of a popular vote, with actual checks and balances to elevate 3rd parties.

    • Welt@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      They’re more powerful and influential than you think - they’re not going anywhere. They might change their policies to suit the times (remember Lincoln was a Republican) but the so-called “Grand Old Party” ain’t going nowhere unfortunately.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      With the exception of millennials, who were born between 1981 and 1996, Gen Z adults are notably less likely than those in other generations to identify as conservative.

      Or in simpler terms, both Millennials and Gen Z are equally less likely than those in other generations to identify as conservative.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It turns out that people don’t become more conservative as they age, they become more conservative as they gain wealth. Millennials and Gen Z aren’t.

        • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Dude it’s plainly obvious, at least in my lived experience trying to reach 40. The Republicans I know who “became” republican all either

          1. Moved up in class (perceived or real)
          2. Became religious
          3. Legitimately has a mental illness

          I am not saying this as a dig, and I am not saying all Republicans etc etc just the people who weren’t and then CHANGED THEIR MIND.

  • Raz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m LGBTQ…AND republican. Although that means something vastly different where I live, haha (I live in a kingdom).

      • Zloubida@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        In my republic (France), Republicans suck too. It looks like you’re right: cool Republicans only exist in monarchies.

        • Isn’t everyone in The France republican? Do you have monarchist French that want to resurrect King Louis? Or do they want to crown Macarone the new King?

          P.S. I had an almond croissant earlier today and took a picture of some frozen snails.

          • Zloubida@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Almost everyone is Republican, but we also have a Republican Party, which isn’t more Republican than the others, this name makes zero sense. It’s the successor of the party of De Gaulle, but I’m quite sure De Gaulle wouldn’t like what this party became.

            There are a few monarchist movements, generally far-right-leaning, like the French Action. But they are very small and divided (there are two candidates for the throne, and different kinds of monarchies), so nobody takes them seriously.

            PS: croissants are good; snails aren’t.

            • De Gaulle

              He really hated the English - which is a bit rich considering we sheltered him during the war. He was proven right on the EU though. We did nothing but cause trouble while in, then left. Precisely what he predicted. :(

              PS: croissants are good; snails aren’t.

              A civilised French! A rare, but welcome, breed. I forgive you for Patay, Formigny, and Castillon. Joan of Arc was obviously suffering the Snail Madness and didn’t realise English rule was superior.

              • Zloubida@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                I don’t think De Gaulle hated the English, but he surely despised them. He despised almost everyone though, and maybe he despised the French more than anyone else, calling us “calves” or mocking our love for cheese, for example. Yeah, he was an asshole.

  • conorm@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    cool post, but political party affiliation means nothing when both sides of the “political spectrum” are actually the same side which are in the pockets of the same individuals who wish to putrify society, the results of which lead to this exact news article :)

  • YTG123@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why would anyone identify by their political ideology? Or worse, by a single party??

    • MadSurgeon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      “Do you like Football. I’m a Packers fan.”

      “Why would anybody identify by their favorite sports team!?”

      “… I take it you don’t like sports”

    • trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because we may have separated from the other great apes several million years ago, but the great ape predilection for tribalism sure hasn’t separated from us

  • hierophant_nihilant@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Fuck, that’s once again proves my point that many of younger folks treat lgbtq as a fucking subculture. There’s no way there are 28% of lgbt people, most of those treat being queer as being trendy. Same sexual preferences and body perception as straight cis, just putting a rainbow flag and dying hair makes them “LGBTQ++” Ricky Gervais was on point in Armageddon