• athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Three out of four of the cable and broadband customers who called to cancel end up retaining some or all service after speaking with an agent.”

    Because threatening to leave is the only way to get a half-decent price?

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Fuck them. Next force gyms and newspapers to allow you to cancel with one click.

    • Fisch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Or just force all subscriptions to allow you to cancel with one click

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Subscriptions with a dead man’s switch. If you don’t signal you want to keep the subscription after a few years, it’s automatically cancelled. You can sign up at the same price you left with if it cancels automatically.

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m so lucky, my gym membership auto cancels if I don’t pay in advance.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yep, my gym would love to cancel my membership. I also paid in advance: 2 years worth for a special limited-time promo. Now, I can renew yearly for $99. Only catch is, if it ever expires, it can’t be joined again. They will pry it from my cold, toned hands!

  • BudgieMania@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Subscription-based services already change the agreement of a transaction too much in favor of the provider, because it goes from “convince me that your product is good enough to go through the hassle of obtaining it” to “convince me that your product is bad enough to go through the hassle of cancelling it”. It is only fair to try to tilt it in favor of the consumer as much as possible.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    God, hearing them squirm is almost making me horny. Please keep them groveling at the feet of the FTC. I reallllly wouldn’t mind hearing this for a few years at least.

    …Funny how whenever Republicans are in power, we get dickheads like Ajit Pai do absolutely nothing, arging that his hands are tied. But when democrats get voted in, the FTC starts drafting rules like being able to cancel a bill with a single click instead of fighting on the phone for 3½ hours with a bullshit sales rep until you have to threaten to sue them in order to cancel your internet or cable package. It’s really funny how that works.

  • The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    We Shouldn’t Have to Let Users enroll Service With a Click. Customers may “misunderstand the consequences of enrolling,”

    Sounds ridiculous? Because it is. Clicking the cancel or enroll button is pretty much what you expect… This is utter nonsense, obviously.

  • menthol@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    They have the right to not let people cancel with a click. They can make it as difficult as they want. It’s shitty but forced subscriptions is all they have.

    But I have a vpn and a torrent client. I will never sign up for another shitty, fragmented streaming service ever again. Stop me if you can.

    • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Why do they have the “right” to lock people into an ongoing subscription though? Subscriptions should absolutely be easy to cancel, even if there’s a termination penalty, it should not be on the consumer to jump through hoops and waste their time to get out of it.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I wouldn’t hand that right to them on a silver platter. This is what consumer protection law is for.

  • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    The one thing where I agree with cable companies about is the risk to consumers accidentally canceling all or multiple services when they intend to just cancel one. It will be hard to explain that a package price will no longer apply if one part of the package is canceled.

    However- it can be addressed with a well-designed cancelation instruction screen. This is a constraint to the communication and process design; it is not an insurmountable barrier like the cable companies are suggesting.

    • Black616Angel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      As a software developer who only has business customers, let me tell you the following:
      No matter how foolproof your system might seem. It never truly is. There is always some idiot (sometimes with a degree) who just can’t understand/use it.

      But they could still try and mostly succeed. They just don’t want to.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The system doesn’t have to be perfect, just good enough to prevent most customers from accidentally cancelling more than they mean to. Anyone who fucks up can be handled by the customer service department.

      • Grippler@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can’t make a perfect UI, because people think differently. What is obvious and logical to one person, is obscure and nonsensical to another. It is impossible to make a one-size-fits-all interface to anything, not just software.

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          You could make a big, red, flashing button that says “pressing this button will cancel all your channels, are you sure you want to do that?”, and you would still get an significant amount of users complaining that pressing the button did exactly what it said it would because users don’t read.

          • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s just the cost of doing business.

            The system now is that you have to call them, get bombarded with ads and berated by their customer service for an hour, then maybe they’ll think about cancelling you. And gyms are even worse.

    • talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I have a feeling they’ll make it difficult to use. Then when people do it accidentally because of they’re shitty UI, they’ll point to that and say, “see?!”