• DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    1. Force women to give birth against their will
    2. Deny them any public support

    Seems like they’re intentionally maximizing the suffering of women and children.

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        They don’t actually give a fuck about cruelty imo because they don’t see worker drones as people. Ensuring the working class is on the edge of crisis is the point. They want people to be hardly making it, but enough to keep going, so they’ll work endlessly and accept crappy conditions. They want people to be deluded by propaganda and not have the energy or time to seek political change. Making money and retaining power is the point.

  • VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    There’s a Venn diagram somewhere of the states denying food aid for children and states rolling back child labor protections. From the linked article “State child labor law changes are part of a broader, troubling agenda to boost corporate profits and increase economic desperation of low-income families and children” and “While FGA lobbies for the erosion of child labor protections in states like Arkansas, Iowa, and Missouri, they are simultaneously working to limit access to anti-poverty programs like SNAP and Medicaid, block expansion of Medicaid eligibility, and promote the defunding of public education through expansion of school vouchers in the same states. Taken together, FGA’s priorities represent a radical, multilayered assault on the same low-income families whose economically desperate children are most vulnerable to recruitment by unscrupulous employers for jobs involving long hours, low wages, and hazardous conditions that harm their education, health, and well-being.”

    So literally the plan is: Make em super hungry, exploit them for cheap labor while they’re young, tell em anyone who’s still hungry is a lazy leach who deserves to starve.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Good! I ONLY want my taxpayer money to be used in Courtrooms striking down Unconstitutional Laws and to pay Rich People MORE money! Fuck Starving Children!

  • AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    “We anticipate that our state’s full approach to serving children will continue to be successful this year without any additional federal programs that inherently always come with some federal strings attached.”

    Like what?

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Maybe they are required to follow educational guidelines that might hamper their book, CRT, black history, LGBTQ+, etc., banning efforts.

    • ElleChaise@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Like when they put interstates through the Southern United States, then had to actually force Florida to enforce drunk driving rules, threatening to take away highway funding iirc. Just one of the million examples I can remember being controversial briefly. I wanna say there was a similar debacle surrounding seat belts. Basically any time the Fed gives you money, it comes with some (albeit basic, somewhat common sense) rules and stipulations.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          The federal government routinely ties highway funds to conditions like that - they did it with drinking age, as well as BAC percentage for drunk driving laws.

          One example:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Minimum_Drinking_Age_Act

          The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 was [… ] signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on July 17, 1984. The act would punish any state that allowed persons under 21 years to purchase alcoholic beverages by reducing its annual federal highway apportionment by 10 percent.

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        “You must turn off the orphan crushing machine to receive food aid for children.”

        GOP, “No, we like our orphan crushing machine.”

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    More than eight million children in 15 states, all led by Republican governors, will be shut out of a new federal food assistance program intended to help needy families during the summer months.

    Set to begin this summer, the new program will provide low-income families with $120 for each eligible child, which can be used to purchase food at grocery stores, farmers’ markets or other approved retailers when such assistance is not available in schools.

    Asked why Florida did not apply for the summer food program, the state’s Department of Children and Families wrote in an email to The Orlando Sentinel last month: “We anticipate that our state’s full approach to serving children will continue to be successful this year without any additional federal programs that inherently always come with some federal strings attached.”

    But he said he was heartened by the willingness of the state’s tribal nations — the Cherokee, Chickasaw and Osage — to offer the program to eligible Native and non-Native children on their reservations.

    Missouri, for instance, wrote in a letter to the Agriculture Department in December that a “lack of final guidance” and the uncertainty of securing state funding posed “potential unforeseen challenges.”

    Still, Caitlin Whaley, communications director for the Missouri Department of Social Services, explained: “Philosophically, we support the premise that kids should be fed in the summer, and this is an additional resource to that end.


    The original article contains 771 words, the summary contains 233 words. Saved 70%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The 15 states that did not apply are Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont and Wyoming.

    Fuck paywalls.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Think of the children…when it’s time for ‘cost savings’.” – G.O.P.