• irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Attack the argument or accept that you’re wrong.

      “Small dick energy” is just a way to say “small dick” without getting called out for it.

      • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Begging people to debate you about how saying small dick energy is like dropping hard Rs is the most small dick energy thing I can think of, no thanks

        • irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          See, you still show no evidence you have any clue what I’m saying, so how can I take you seriously? I never said it is “like droping hard Rs”. Seriously, get up to speed or get lost.

          • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Here’s an actual, completely serious input for you: If you want people to take you seriously and actually engage, don’t start by comparing them to outspoken racists. People will prefer to roast you

            • irmoz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I’m not. I didn’t realise people would be so confused by analogies.

              I compared the rhetoric. That’s the point of such devices. You don’t have to be a racist to use similar logic to them.

              This isn’t complicated whatsoever.

              The guy is hiding behind semantics, so I described another instance of hiding behind semantics. I deliberately used an extreme example so the error was more clear. Basic reductio ad absurdum.