• irmoz@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Attack the argument or accept that you’re wrong.

    “Small dick energy” is just a way to say “small dick” without getting called out for it.

    • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Begging people to debate you about how saying small dick energy is like dropping hard Rs is the most small dick energy thing I can think of, no thanks

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        See, you still show no evidence you have any clue what I’m saying, so how can I take you seriously? I never said it is “like droping hard Rs”. Seriously, get up to speed or get lost.

        • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Here’s an actual, completely serious input for you: If you want people to take you seriously and actually engage, don’t start by comparing them to outspoken racists. People will prefer to roast you

          • irmoz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I’m not. I didn’t realise people would be so confused by analogies.

            I compared the rhetoric. That’s the point of such devices. You don’t have to be a racist to use similar logic to them.

            This isn’t complicated whatsoever.

            The guy is hiding behind semantics, so I described another instance of hiding behind semantics. I deliberately used an extreme example so the error was more clear. Basic reductio ad absurdum.