• MJBrune@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Uh, I don’t want to know exactly what you are implying but those people are still people. It’s really not okay to threaten groups like that. These are folks making a living where they can. How does that make it okay to imply that you are going to attack them?

      • thepaperpilot@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        The bit about “no” not meaning “no” means they’re specifically implying meta employees can be sexually assaulted even if they say no. I’m sure it’s said in jest, but it’s still a fairly offensive comment.

      • M. Orange@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It reads to me like they’re saying that they feel like they might be attacked by Meta employees.

        That said, it’s uh… quite a choice to have made to say that.

        • nromdotcom@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, interesting. I also initially read it as a thinly-veiled threat but I think you’re right it was more of a “will i be assaulted”. Still a weird thing to say.

    • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hi @Leafeytea - I’ve removed this comment because a lot of folks are reading it as threatening toward Meta employees. I don’t want to assume that’s your intention, though. If you’d like, shoot me a DM or reply here and I will restore the comment if you would like to edit it to clarify what you meant.