There are few things quite as emblematic of late stage capitalism than the concept of “planned obsolescence”.

      • hoodatninja@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well for starters it wasn’t purchased by or for schools so no. But even if it was, it gets far more than 3 years of support. I think 5 is somewhat reasonable if we’re just going to accept this sort of behavior.

        Either way the comparison is not really apt. Mobile devices are far worse about this than PC’s. You should instead compare a macbook (or a cheap windows machine), which gets security updates for 7-10 years. Google knows their devices are very popular for school computers, so to treat them like mobile devices and enforce the terrible standards that comes with is pernicious.

        • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          you again chose a macbook for an example, some macs released in 2017 got less than 5 years of OS updates and became ewaste very quickly

          choose a different company than apple for your “long time support” examples…

          • hoodatninja@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was one example, and if you’ll notice I said “or just any affordable windows machine,” I don’t know why you’re ignoring that.

            As for the 2017 releases getting less than 5 years support, I have never heard of this nor am I finding any examples. Here is the Monterey (apple’s current OS version) compatibility list, which consists of computers as far back as 2013. So I’d be curious to see what you’re referencing. Catalina, the previous OS which dates back even further with compatibility, had security updates until about 8mo ago as well.

            3 years is unacceptable on Google’s part and Apple hasn’t come anywhere close to that.