Summary

A potential U.S. government shutdown looms after 38 House Republicans joined Democrats in rejecting a Trump-backed spending bill, which included a debt ceiling increase.

Trump derailed Speaker Mike Johnson’s initial bipartisan plan, causing GOP infighting and weakening Johnson’s leadership.

MAGA allies Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy rallied for a shutdown, angering GOP moderates.

The failure could furlough federal workers and disrupt holiday travel.

Frustration grows within the GOP over chaotic negotiations, foreshadowing future challenges under Trump’s second-term agenda.

  • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    A limit increase is different from lifting the limit. The wording is admittedly quite similar, but lifting means removing completely. So this whole song and dance never happens again.

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m only stating what the facts are. Often as it relates to law “lift” has an alternative meaning of to remove. Sometimes you see it with “lifting a ban” or “lifting restrictions”.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Now that I read the article:

          Trump threw Johnson a surprise curveball by demanding lawmakers increase the U.S. debt ceiling—an issue that previously had nothing to do with negotiations to avoid a government shutdown.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Indeed; the debt limit forces Congress to show up for work and make decisions, including ones that aren’t politically expedient. If it is permanently lifted, the executive suddenly has an unlimited checking account, with limited accountability. Having that limit is what keeps congress in control of what gets done.

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t think having that limit realistically affects much other than government employees having to work unpaid for a while, but it is an area I feel like a compelling case could be made either way.