• marrow1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I cannot decide what to support here. On one hand, Tiktok is a blight and a cancer upon the whole world. But on the other hand, I’m kind of a libertarian, anyone should be able to do what they like.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Good riddance, vertical videos are cancer, short form obliterates attention spans, and their algorithm is engineered specifically to addict people, especially kids.

    Now to ban all the rest of them. Let’s start with Facebook. Twitter is already killing itself but could stand to be “helped” off the cliff.

      • Woht24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Depends what you use it for.

        I joined Facebook when it first came out, when it was still only for Uni students, used it for many years and stopped probably about 8-10 years ago now. Fuck, how long has it been around for?

        Anyway, I’ve recently rediscovered Facebook as I bought an old muscle car and I’ve been enjoying the groups and marketplace for parts.

        Anyway, just a thought from an old Facebook user.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 days ago

              Sorta rough facebook is the avenue for that nowadays. Sorta like if public libraries were located inside walmarts or something.

        • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          I just use it to find shitty $50 flat screen televisions when the next one dies. Works a treat.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Agreed. Much of my family is on it, and most of them live in other countries. My brother, who is ASD, prefers to communicate with it rather than text or phone, and I live at least an hour’s drive from any friends. I use it to talk to them and I have joined a handful of groups, most of which I don’t post in, I just lurk.

          I also tell them I don’t want to see any ads of any type of thing except the narrow number of things I don’t give a shit about if I see an ad for. Lots of telling them “I don’t want to see ads of this type” for a while, but it’s not anywhere near as bad now.

          I did discover recently that if you go to “feeds” rather than just look at the main scroll, you see a lot less bullshit.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      As a video editor, let me tell you how much I hate that not only do people watch shitty vertical videos all the time, but I’ve had to learn how to edit the fucking things.

      I hate vertical video on a professional level.

      That’s not just a TikTok thing though.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Why would America ban Facebook for being a “national security threat” to America lmao? Nothing about this had to do with protecting kids or the dangers of social media. Don’t act like it did.

    • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      These bans are bad. All it takes is for the US to think the fediverse is a threat and this goes too. You clearly don’t like the platform and that’s okay, but don’t root for government censorship on the internet.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        The only reason this is bannable is that it is owned by china essentially; based on national security grounds. As long as the fediverse is never sold to an enemy nation, there’s nothing to worry about.

        • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          The US has control of US tiktok servers. This is bannable because politicians want the power to control social media.

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            Not true. That’s why the banning has a clause allowing for the sale of the US portion to a US (or other allied) company.

              • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                There’s no national security basis to ban social media from the US or a friendly country. It would be protected by the first amendment otherwise. They have actual evidence that China was using TikTok as electronic warfare, which is the only reason they can ban it.

                • nek0d3r@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  I’m baffled by your blind faith in politicians. There’s been clear foreign influence on just about every major social media platform.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Yeah, I’m all for Australia style banning to kids, however that gets implemented, but this is slippery slope and all that. But hey, maybe not, maybe it’s the only time they do it.

  • airportline@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    This is only great news if you are Mark Zuckerberg and you want a near-monopoly on social media.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          No. I’m implying that in general, international trade works by shared openness or shared closeness. If one country or economic region an import tax on something, the reciprocal thing is likely to be taxed by the opposite partner.

          I was responding to someone saying “oh this just creates a monopoly for Zucks” when in fact the Chinese social companies have a monopoly in China (an ENORMOUS market) because our products are blocked over there.

          So what we are doing is in line with the norm in international trade.

          • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            Is anyone else besides China doing this? Cannot really call it international norm if 1 country is doing this.

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              I don’t think I’ve explained my point very well, or you’ve misunderstood what I’ve said.

              My point is all international relationship is tit for tat. Since China chose to block western social media, it’s not unreasonable for the west to block Chinese social media.

    • maplebar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      TikTok could have sold to an American company (read: a company that we can hold legally accountable for bad things that their product does) and made billions of dollars in the process. They chose not to, for some reason, and thus knowingly opted to face a ban in the United States. Those were the options and they knew it.

      As I understand it American companies doing business in China almost always have to go through a Chinese company in order to operate legally and make products available to the Chinese market. Platforms like Facebook are already banned in China and must be accessed through a VPN because they don’t play ball with the Chinese regime, so why should it not be reciprocal?

      Until TikTok is being managed and operated by a company that can be held legally accountable here in America, they are nothing but a security threat and a backdoor for the Chinese government into every cell phone of every person who is dumb enough to install that shit. Is that what the people want to hear? Probably not, but it’s the truth.

      I wouldn’t install TikTok on my phone any sooner than I’d install RedStarOS on my PC, because the implications of using a proprietary, closed source application with ties to the Chinese regime should be fucking obvious to anyone with bare minimum technical knowledge. Likewise, I wouldn’t blame a Chinese person for being skeptical of Microsoft Windows or X.com for their close relationship with the American government. To think otherwise is just not smart.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    The ban will not stand up and, because he had no core principles and is an opportunistic scoundrel, when this fails inevitably, trump will folly shift position and reframe/embrace the failure as deliberate action he took to “give tiktok back to the young people”. He’ll then do his double jerk off dance on the white house account and cement another couple decades of loyalty from the underinformed gen zers who will make up the bulk mass of humanity that officially drives us into full “ouch my balls” idiocracy

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    ITT: Braindeads defending government censorship of the internet as if Zuckerberg won’t immediately replace the void with his own platform or by buying out TikTok in a bid.

    Banning one platform would not magically get rid of short attention span and brainrot you fools. Every social media company already copied or utilizes the same techniques as TikTok, which is already a massive platform because they don’t spam ban or regulate content as hard as Facebook and YouTube do.

    It is insulting that a Chinese run social media platform provides more freedom of speech online than its US competitors.

    They’re banning it to remove competition, congress does not care about its effects on privacy or health, otherwise they’d have done something about Faceebook, Insta, Twiiter, and YouTube decades ago. They pulled their usual committee shenanigans to pretend to care by calling in CEOs to testify, and then promptly accepting a shitload of lobbying money.

    • Cowabunga_It_Is@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Banning one platform would not magically get rid of short attention span and brainrot you fools.

      Ah yes, the old “Taking this action won’t solve all of the problems therefore we should do nothing” argument.

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      You think the communist party of China will allow western billionaires to buy one of their asymmetrical psyops weapon systems? Ha!

    • Trantarius@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Absolutely none of this law was ever about privacy or mental health. No one ever claimed it was. The law is banning tiktok because it is based in China. That is the reason given by the law itself. The possibility that meta or Google or some other American company will buy or replace tiktok and operate the same way is not an unintended outcome. It is literally the whole point of the law to get bytedance to sell tiktok to an American company.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Hence them saying it’s braindead to say otherwise.

        What would be interesting to see is if other countries ban Facebook because it’s a “national security risk” lol.

        • maplebar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          From China’s perspective, Facebook probably IS a “national security risk”, which is why it is already banned over there.

          For American to do business and sell products in China, they almost always have to go through a Chinese company. I’m sure that’s part capitalism and part accountability theater, but it’s just a fact. So why is it such an outrage for America to ask TikTok to do the same?

    • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Agree on this except I have doubts that this statement is true

      It is insulting that a Chinese run social media platform provides more freedom of speech online than its US competitors.

      • Ostrichgrif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Yeah tiktok is the reason we have words like unalive, I wouldnt call it freedom of speech just incompetent moderation.

          • Cowabunga_It_Is@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            I have to admit, it’s a bit bizarre seeing so many comments holding up TikTok as if it’s a free speech bastion away from western-run social media companies.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Isn’t this the one where people started saying “g*y” because there’s only one sexuality and Taiwan doesn’t exist?

    • Tregetour@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Competitor lobbying doesn’t even enter into it, I’d guess.

      The US State Department won’t tolerate Americans being exposed to media that doesn’t adhere to its view of the world. What large groups of Americans think - and vitally, the bounds of what they are permitted to think - is a national security ‘issue’ in the eyes of the state. No such problem exists with Facebook, cable news, the establishment newspapers, etc. As Chomsky teaches, propaganda is equally about what isn’t in the news.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    stupid rule that helped cost Harris the election. Fuck every moron that voted for it.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I am rubbing my nipples in anticipation of the FLOOD of pissed off teenagers who don’t know how to human without sharing their dances now.

    …can someone explain the point of overlaying closed captions over the center of the video, but one word at a time fast paced?

    • rigatti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Actually captions like that can help you read faster. I’ve seen speed reading training things like that.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            So who is it for? This is everywhere. It’s in YT shorts, Instagram posts, etc. As a style, it’s getting pretty ubiquitous, and I don’t understand the reason for it. At best it’s annoying because if I look away for a split second, I’ll miss a couple words and it won’t make sense anymore.

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 days ago

              Well. A good assumption in life is if something is popular, and you don’t get it, it’s not for you so don’t worry.

              People like weird shit.

              I personally find that words on screen keeps my attention. But it annoys me if the thing I’m watching isn’t worth my attention. So it’s 50/50.

    • itsathursday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      I don’t understand it either but it’s a product of how people consume the videos in their upright depression rectangles in public places with no volume I’d imagine.

    • FindME@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      The one word at a time thing is a way to demand more of your attention. It’s just a side path of the old advertising stick where words would ‘pop’ in weird ways. See this video for an example.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      I’m on the spectrum. I can process reading way, WAY faster than I can process someone just audibly speaking to me. That shit’s actually helpful. I admit, it doesn’t need to be in the center of the video though.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      They don’t care what the content or format is, just who owns it, and where the data is flowing. They want the data flowing into the U.S. and sold out. Rather than into China and sold out. That’s all it is.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Theater.

      Cybersec is hard. There are always more holes. China exports a LOT of stuff with holes. We can do little more than stick our fingers in the dyke. This looks like they’re doing something.

      What they’re not going to expect is how much people hate them for taking their entertainment away.

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            What are you suggesting? That Congress didn’t force TikTok to hand over control is US servers years ago? You didn’t see it in the news at the time, or you just don’t believe it?

            Or do you think China has been censoring on behalf of the state dept?

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 days ago

              I think they still get all the data of what goes off the servers, and I think that the Chinese side of the company still has ultimate control over what gets displayed.

              The servers being in the US means that the Chinese government doesn’t have to have access to the servers but it doesn’t mean that they still don’t have the equivalent situation silently going on.

              • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                I really don’t care if China gets my data. They don’t have any jurisdiction over me. I’m concerned about domestic surveillance.

      • gcheliotis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Because when US politicians advocate for a single, global market, and a single, global internet, it is with the understanding that US firms and allied parties will dominate the space anyway. When that is no longer the case they get about as nervous as the Chinese got when they went and built the Great Firewall and made a clone of every popular western platform. Now that US/Western dominance is seriously challenged, we are seeing more and more signs of protectionism.

      • actually@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        That and labor organizing, environmental awareness, and many other things where the absence helps the rich get wealthier .

        It’s also just a blatant theft; there is a lot of money to be made here however it goes down , and that money goes to connected arseholes

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          It also broadcasts propaganda disproportionately highly and harmful ideologies as much as that little list of yours.

          On its face the platform itself is neither good nor bad, but the massive theft of identifying information, photos, and personal conversations leading to increasingly common hacking and theft from Chinese sources tips the scales a bit.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      They aren’t banning it because China can see what you put on it, they’re banning it because China can control what you see from it.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            Sure, I’m just saying that Republicans are taking over and they rely on the disinformation machine to have a chance to get elected so banning TikTok goes against their interests.

      • Allonzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Are we still supposed to be on this shithole’s side or something?

        I don’t care about winning the global economy. Do you? Does anyone who isn’t a sociopath that would. Drown a thousand babies for another nickel of quarterly earnings?

        The nords are quite happy without playing herp derp growth or die.

        • Moc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          Inversely, they’re banning it because the US cannot control what is posted on it— regardless of whether the central party in China can (they can and they do though so I am not sure why you’re debating it).

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            Really? Then you can point to the news article that lays out evidence of that actually happening and not just quoting FUD?

            What the government wants out of this is to make an example. Then whenever they want something from Meta, Google, Apple, X, etc, they’re going to remind them of TikTok while pointing to the third section of the definition for foreign control. The catch all that says the app can be considered foreign if the government claims the owner has been unduly influenced by a foreign entity.

        • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          There’s no evidence that China can control what’s shown on a China-owned app?

          In case you’re still unaware, the China govt is the ultimate authority within China, even in private companies. More so after recent crackdowns on their oligarchs and billionaires. The idea that they have no control over tiktok is plain laughable.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            TikTok has gone out of their way to show they’ve siloed American operations. There has been no evidence that the Chinese government could or would breach that.

            • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              20 days ago

              So you’re arguing that TikTok US, despite being fully owned and controlled by China, has full independence and decision making capability? Even regular western companies don’t have that. What the home office says, goes. At most, their American operations are making sure they’re abiding by US law with regards to data and such (and even then I’d highly doubt that, given all the forensic breakdowns about TikTok sending encrypted data to China).

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                20 days ago

                If it sends encrypted data to China it would be the first I’ve heard of it. The worst the news could come up with last time is headcount data. And yes they went on an entire project to silo it. At the end of the day they want the money, and TikTok shop provides it. Other than that they sell the same info Meta does on the open market.

                • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  And yes they went on an entire project to silo it

                  So? It doesn’t matter what internal bureaucratic sleight of hand they pull. The bosses are in the CCP, and when they say ‘jump’, the answer is going to be ‘how high?’. That’s how private companies work.

                  At the end of the day they want the money

                  TikTok wants money. The CCP wants other stuff. As long as the CCP isn’t making demands, TikTok will make their money. The moment the CCP says to do something, TikTok will do it.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  20 days ago

                  I really don’t think China is nearly as interested in siphoning data as controlling the algorithm. Getting people to see more pro-Chinese videos, more anti-US videos, and some bias toward candidates they want to see win is completely doable without exfiltrating any data.

                  Basically, all the stuff people are pissed about Musk doing to Twitter (changing algo to push right wing content) are just as feasible for TikTok to do, with the main difference being China is a state actor, whereas Musk is a private billionaire.

                  We should be very worried about any social media app that’s very popular and controlled by an org with political motivations.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  If it sends encrypted data to China it would be the first I’ve heard of it.

                  No shit. Do you think they would tell everyone? Do you think it would be easy to prove?

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Because it’s bad if China has the information. It’s fine if “US entity” had the information. The ban is ultimately fake. No one banning the app cares about TikTok, they just hate that China is getting the information they want. What will happen is some US based company, Oracle last time, but someone like that will buy a sufficient enough stake in the company and the ban will not happen. It will be declared “safe” and the data will go to a US controlled entity, but also still secretly to China. (The later will be revealed years later, to the shock of no one.)

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      That implies that social media is going to be banned; it isn’t. The only thing this ban does is punish Tiktok for allowing content that revealed Israel’s genocide.

      The thing about freedom of speech is that we are only allowed speech that doesn’t threaten the interests of the oligarchs. If any speech creates a real movement that threatens the oligarchy then the government takes swift action against it (hence outlawing socialism during the red scare)

    • Nima@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      the issue with loops is there’s no algorithm. so I get 10 random videos that don’t interest me and just one that does, almost.

      that’s not going to work long term for engagement. i already get bored on loops after like a minute.

        • Nima@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          healthy? what do you mean by healthy. healthy for whom? the life of the app itself? because it won’t survive without dedicated users.

          if there is no algorithm to keep track of what users want to see vs don’t want to see, they’ll stop using the app in favor of apps that cater to their interests.

          watching a random video of something I’m not interested in isn’t particularly all that fun.

          if an app learns I like anime and video games or specific types of content, then I’m more likely to use the app.

    • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      “We got rid of the brain cancer. Here, have leukemia instead”

      The way I see this is that it’s not TikTok that’s the issue. It’s short form videos.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 days ago

          My kids have to be forced to watch anything longer than about 10 minutes. Movie night! one and a half hours? that soooo lonnnng.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Short-form vertical video social platforms are here to stay.

        We are not going to turn back the clock. I say this as someone who doesn’t use TikTok.

        The only semi-realistic (and I use this term very casually) option would be some sort of radical, never-seen-before change in our global societal and socioeconomic models. The dynamics of short form video social media will be the least of our concerns in such a scenario.

      • Korkki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        The real issue is that these companies are purely for profit and couldn’t give a flying fuck about any negative social implications of their product. Every Le bad thing about any service is just down streamed from this reality of society.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Without the super addictive algorithm, it won’t draw the Tiktokers. It’ll take a serious marketing department to make it even start to compete. TT and Insta have spent an assload of money to make their algo addictive. FB and YT shorts took years of paid content injection at enormous scales to even become interesting.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      TikTok has said multiple times they will not sell. They will just exit the US market.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      How nice must it be to be able to force your biggest competitor to sell their business off. You either get it on the cheap, or get to make the replacement product.