inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 days agoWill Trump Prosecute His Foes? Allies and Adversaries Expect a Wave of Revenge.www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkWill Trump Prosecute His Foes? Allies and Adversaries Expect a Wave of Revenge.www.nytimes.cominclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareWatDabney@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoGiven the opportunity, no, he’s not going to prosecute his foes. He’s going to have them killed. But until he can count on getting away with that, he’ll have to, and will, settle for just prosecuting them.
minus-squareWatDabney@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoWhatever. It doesn’t matter. The basis upon which the Supreme Court will rule in his favor as necessary might be of some scholarly interest, but that they’re going to is already a given.
minus-squareTriPolarBearz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoMerriam-Webster 2025 word of the year: defenstration
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 days agoSpecifically, official acts + presidential pardons
Given the opportunity, no, he’s not going to prosecute his foes. He’s going to have them killed.
But until he can count on getting away with that, he’ll have to, and will, settle for just prosecuting them.
Official act?
Whatever. It doesn’t matter.
The basis upon which the Supreme Court will rule in his favor as necessary might be of some scholarly interest, but that they’re going to is already a given.
Merriam-Webster 2025 word of the year: defenstration
Specifically, official acts + presidential pardons