I am not a teen.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If it does not serve a purpose for the plot, then it’s not needed. Simple as that.

    • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      As I said here:

      Why does it have to further the plot?! Why does sex/nudity have to justify itself when tons of movies have gratuitous action scenes and violence that add nothing to the plot? 90% of John Wick is gratuitous violence that added nothing to the story (but I still love it). Our culture celebrates violence and we’ll watch people get tortured to death without batting an eye - but if some tits show up on screen then suddenly everyone becomes a critic analyzing whether the story REALLY needed it or not.

      It’s disturbing to me that we’re culturally encouraged to find fun in violence but sex needs to be cordoned off to a containment genre and excised from mainstream art. I’m not saying it needs to be in every movie - but its been obvious for a while they’re going out of their way to avoid it, even in places where it would make sense or be fun. I want art to stop awkwardly excluding a major part of life. I want out of this “Everyone is beautiful and no one is horny” Twilight Zone multiverse that all our modern movies seem to take place in.

      Sex is too important to be left to porn.

      • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The point of John Wick is the gratuitous violence. The plot of John Wick is in service to delivering gratuitous violence. The name for a movie whose plot is in service to delivering gratuitous sex is “pornography.” Tasteful, artistic nudity is one thing. Even sex, in service to the plot or purpose of the movie, is another thing. But sex just to sell the movie or check a box is not a thing: we’re now talking smut. Cheap, common, vulgar smut.

        “Everyone is ugly and everyone is fucking” is just real life. If you want “Everyone is beautiful and everyone is fucking,” good news- that’s called porn already, and there’s so much of it. I like smut, and porn. Which is why I can recognize softcore in movies when I see it. Stop me if you’ve heard this one before, but if I wanted to watch porn I’d go home and masturbate.

        I congratulate you on your personal sexual liberation. Please keep your jollies to yourself- in private- while we pitiful repressed twilight zone voyeurs awkwardly exclude sex from our public lives.

        • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’m not saying I want movies that have as much sex as John Wick has violence - obviously that would just be porn. My point is: why does sex have this obligation to move the plot forward when we give a pass to other gratuitous scenes (action, drama, violence, etc)?

          If you want “Everyone is beautiful and everyone is fucking,” good news- that’s called porn already, and there’s so much of it.

          The fact that you only equate sex/nudity to porn reveals the problem. Seems like many young people today can’t associate sex/nudity on a screen as art, or even just fun, anymore - because in their minds sex/nudity is inextricably tied to porn. The reality is sex/nudity can be fun, dramatic, scary, or funny depending on the context. It can have a place in many kinds of stories, and comparing it to porn is like saying “we have war documentaries so we don’t need war movies.” They are completely different things!!

          while we pitiful repressed twilight zone voyeurs awkwardly exclude sex from our public lives.

          Who said it has to be part of your “public life”? I’m not saying we should all want to watch Wild Things with our parents, but not every movie needs to be a ‘family movie’ that you’d want to watch in polite company. Some movies are best watched with rowdy friends or an intimate partner - and I’m sad that those types of movies have been in decline. The younger generations seem far more prudish than I ever expected.

          • DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            The fact that you only equate sex/nudity to porn reveals the problem.

            I took the trouble to delineate tasteful nudity, or sex that actually serves a purpose in the plot (your fine examples of drama or fear are great suggestions, though I worry about the encroachment of porn with a “fun sex scene”) from common smut.

            As for public life: the theater is a public place, my thought goes no further than that.

            Thinking back now, I can even empathize with some of your feelings here. In the abu dhabi branch of the louvre, there is an ancient marble statue of a man that stands twice my height if my memory serves. Its genitals have been roughly gouged out with chisels in stark contrast to the smooth curve of skin and cloth for the entire rest of the statue. It’s nauseating and disrespectful not just to the creator’s work and vision but to human dignity. I think me seeing that statue and feeling what I felt is something comparable to how you now feel. I’m not afraid of or ashamed of the human form or human sexuality, but these things have a time and a place and a respect due that is often not granted or even considered.

            So maybe im just watching the wrong movies. what not-porn movie are you watching that treats sex with the dignity and respect it deserves?

      • Redredme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Its very simple. Sex is boring to look at. Even porn. Whats the longest you watched a porn movie? 5 minutes? 15? Let’s top it off at 30 minutes. Just to be safe.

        Violence is not boring. Stuff like John Wick grabs you by the ass and puts you on a roller coaster.

        Want proof? Look at gaming. How big are the dating sims? Now compare that with call of duty/etc.

        So, me? Yeah, stop with the xxl steamy sex scenes in movies. Very rarely do they add anything more then an interlude. A time to get coffee. To look at your notifications. At best.

        To be clear: I love sex. My sex.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Exactly this. A lot of media is atrocious about shoehorning in things even if they are jarring and dont make sense. Token characters (race, sexuality), token ideologies (veganism, feminism, religion, etc), stereotypes, you name it.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        People downvoting as a reactionary for making them feel bad, but I agree.

        Having a stereotype as a character for the sake of “representation” is not representing anything good and is not doing justice to anyone who would be more than a single note character.

        I’m tired of bad writing and gimmicks to get people to have a reaction to an otherwise bad story, but that doesn’t mean I want movies with none of the topics in it, I just want it to mean something when it’s there.

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Exactly.

          (Natural/Organic storytelling) The Boys: Maeve, Kimiko, and Starlight, beating the shit out of Stormfront

          Vs

          (Forced/jarring) That scene in Avengers Endgame, where every female character from across a massive battlefield appeared next to each other. As opposed to the scene in Infinity War with Proxima Midnight which felt fairly natural.

          • Wade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Or even better, movies actually dedicated to telling stories about underrepresented cultures such as The Woman King

            • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I remember seeing trailers about that, completely forgot to actually go watch it. I’ll add it to my watch list (someday I’ll start watching things on the list)

      • CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah because everyone in media needs to be straight, white, and Christian. 🙄

        Representation matters.

        • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure, but I get what they mean. Sometimes you have a minority character that doesn’t very much seem to interact with the plot, nor has many discernable personality trait beyond being part of a minority.

          Representation matters, but it should be done in a way that makes the characters actual people, not just a tick in a checkbox.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            And there is definitely a tokenism issue in Hollywood. There’s a reason why the “gay best friend” is a Hollywood stereotype.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They’re saying that characters irrelevant to the plot having diverse roles feels forced. Wouldn’t you agree diverse roles should be in meaningful roles like leads?

          • CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, I don’t think I would agree. If I walk down the street, I’m going to see people of all types. Why should including people of all types in media be any different? Having more diversity in lead roles is preferable, yes, but I don’t see what feels “forced” about more diversity across all roles. If anything, it seems like that would be more realistic.

    • khan_shot_1st@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Character development? It might not directly impact the plot or move the story forward, but how a character relates to sex can tell us (the audience) a lot about them.

  • figaro@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well yeah, I think this is universal. No one wants to watch a sex scene with their parents

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I watched GoT largely with my parents. It shouldn’t be that big of a deal. That said, does it add anything? I can watch as much porn as a I want whenever I want.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Fair point I guess. If you want to watch porn with your parents, for some reason, but feel like that’s too far, I guess sex scenes is the best you can do.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can understand that now that we have access to easy-direct–instant-proper porn that sex scenes are less appealing to the majority of people.

    When I was a kid they would definitely include a sex scene just so that people looking to jerk off would be willing to watch or buy.

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not to pick on you or anything, but I just can’t understand this perspective.

      Like, imagine wanting less action in your Marvel movies because you can just youtube real fights in Denny’s restaurants.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I guess it depends on the effects action could have on you.

        If you’re the type to get really pumped and hyped at action, something you do enjoy but maybe not all the time, then inserting it into a movie that you wanted to give you some other emotion would take away from the overall experience because it’s hard to get out of the juiced up state of mind.

        So if sex scenes make you horny, and maybe you’re conditioned to get immediate relief from that feeling because of porn, then I can see why that could hinder your enjoyment of the overall movie.

    • lousyd@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah but, sex scenes in movies and sex in porn are hardly even the same thing. They’re so wildly different, I don’t see how one could be a replacement for the other.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        When porn was less accessible they could definitely be in the realm. Now it’s more often bad soft core or HBO style taking up too much of an episode without moving the plot.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Growing up my friend had a special VHS tape he’d rent movies and record the sex scenes to. He was pretty sheltered and just didn’t have access to much else.

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        True, but they can still get you (especially during Puberty) horny.

        I think thats what these kids are actually complaining about. They’re used to getting turned on and immediately being able to satisfy themselves on their phones. But during a movie they’ve got to wait another hour before they can releave themselves and that’s frustrating for them.

  • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have strong feelings about this because I miss horny comedies like American Pie, and sexy thrillers like Wild Things. I miss stuff like Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Boogie Nights, Office Space, Eyes Wide Shut, True Lies. They all had sex/nudity in a way that furthered the plot, or was just plain fun. All of the criticisms I see here sadden me:

    • “It doesn’t further the plot!!!”

    It can absolutely be an important part of the story. See the examples above. Look at most of our ancient mythologies. On top of that I pose the question: Why does it have to further the plot?! Why does sex/nudity have to justify itself when tons of movies have gratuitous action scenes and violence that add nothing to the plot. 90% of John Wick is gratuitous violence that added nothing to the plot (but I still love it). Our culture celebrates violence and we’ll watch people get tortured to death without batting an eye - but if some tits show up on screen then suddenly everyone becomes a critic analyzing whether the story REALLY needed it or not.

    • “I don’t want to watch that with my kids/parents/coworkers/etc”

    I agree. So don’t. Some of my favorite movies are raunchy comedies or sexy thrillers that I would never want to watch in polite company. That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t exist! If art were constrained by what you wanted to display in front of your kids/parents/coworkers then our artistic & cultural landscape would be a much bleaker place.

    • “We have easy access to porn, I don’t want porn in my movies!”

    The fact that you only equate sex/nudity to porn reveals a problem. Kids today can’t associate sex/nudity on a screen as art, or even just fun, anymore - because in their minds sex/nudity is inextricably tied to porn. The reality is sex/nudity can be fun, dramatic, scary, or funny depending on the context. It can have a place in many kinds of stories, and comparing it to porn is like saying “we have WWII documentaries so we don’t need WWII movies.” They are completely different things!!

    • “It’s usually cringey & not done well!”

    By that logic you could make arguments against a lot of different genres and classic story elements. I don’t like the argument that because media these days sucks at doing something they should avoid it altogether. I think they should just do better. Movies in the 80s and 90s proved it can be done.


    It’s disturbing to me that we’re culturally encouraged to find fun in violence but sex needs to be cordoned off to a containment genre and excised from mainstream art. I’m not saying it needs to be in every movie - but its been obvious for a while they’re going out of their way to avoid it even in places where it would make sense or be fun. I want art to stop awkwardly excluding a major part of life. I want out of this “Everyone is beautiful and no one is horny” Twilight Zone multiverse that all our modern movies seem to take place in.

    • DjMeas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Great points! Personally for me I can do with less gorey violence. What I’m most interested in is good action sequences.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Even in kids movies I get questions like “does the goomba die when Mario smashes it?”

        Thats maybe an absurd example but I think it highlights how we see stories where characters often solve their problems with violence, even as a first choice.

        Sometimes the tone is wildly off too, like watching the good guy kill multiple people and then everyone is jovial about it.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          All those comic book movies are especially weird.

          Slaughter their way through an army of henchmen who presumably have families and homes to go to and are nothing more than hired goons, before getting to the mastermind and mostly just giving them a firm telling off and taking them to prison.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If violence doesn’t further the plot then it shouldn’t be in there either.

      Nobody is saying you can’t have sexy comedies. We’re just tired of stupid shit like the mid-life threatening event romance scene. The timer on the bomb is literally counting down and they take the time to profess their love and it’s not a comedy so I’m the asshole for laughing in the theater.

      It’s been ridiculous for decades and we’re tired of it.

      • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        If violence doesn’t further the plot then it shouldn’t be in there either.

        A lot of action movies would be very short. My poor kung fu movies would need to be cut down to about 15 minutes. Why can’t we sometimes just have gratuitous things for the fun of it? Not everything needs to be high art.

        We’re just tired of stupid shit like the mid-life threatening event romance scene. The timer on the bomb is literally counting down and they take the time to profess their love and it’s not a comedy so I’m the asshole for laughing in the theater.

        I think you’re taking out on sex/nudity/romance what you should be attributing to bad filmmaking. With good writing/acting/directing/editing that exact cliche’ scenario you describe could be done in such a way as to be genuinely funny, or touching, or sexy.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure. Sometimes. As a specific movie made for that. Not every single show and movie producers can cram it into.

        • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nobody is arguing that all movies need to remove violence or sexy? Where are you even getting that from?

          But no one here is arguing the problem is inherently with sex or romance…you pulled that assumption out of your ass. The entire point of this thread is that unnecessary sex or violence is a crutch of bad film making…

          • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Nobody is arguing that all movies need to remove violence or sexy? Where are you even getting that from?

            The comment I’m replying to (and quoted) literally said: “If violence doesn’t further the plot then it shouldn’t be in there either.” And plenty of people in these comments are arguing that if sexiness doesn’t further the plot it shouldn’t be there.

            But no one here is arguing the problem is inherently with sex or romance

            Again, the person I’m replying to was explicitly saying that forced romantic scenes suck, as if they are inherently a problem. I’m just saying I think the “forced” part is the problem, not the romance/sex/nudity. People here are denigrating sex/nudity/romance in film when what they should be mad at is bad filmmaking in general.

            • AugustWest@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              That is literally what everyone else is saying. You are arguing with no one.

              The problem IS shitty filmmaking. The specific examples of shitty filmmaking being discussed are pointless violence and pointless sex scenes that don’t contribute to the movie in any way.

              • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Uh no, lots of people here are arguing that all sex scenes that don’t actively move the plot forward are inherently pointless and shouldn’t be there. And I’m disagreeing.

                Sex/nude scenes can positively contribute to the mood, themes, character development, world building, and other things that aren’t absolutely necessary to move a plot forward.

                If the original article was titled “Teens want better implementation of sex in movies” I wouldn’t have commented. But most people aren’t complaining about “bad implementation” or “bad filmmaking” - they’re saying they don’t want sex in film at all unless ABSOLUTELY necessary, and I think that’s unfortunate.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would appreciate less violence too. It feels like since GoT they have to put some gory violence and some sex scenes into everything that is targeted at an adult audience.

      The point really is not about fundamental opposition. It is about being oversaturated and hence tired of it. That is why it is annoying when it doesn’t further the plot, is done cringey or well, seems like an attempt at being porn of some sort. That stuff worked in the 80s and 90s, when people still had to rent VHS. People being addicted to porn and harming themselves with their overconsumption but being in denial about it probably also adds in here.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Statistically, there’s a lot more violence and a lot less sex for people under the age of 30. So it just kind of reflects the experiences of young people I guess.

    • lousyd@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh man, I wish I could give you more than one upvote. Thank you for this well reasoned defense of sex in movies.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes. Yes, yes, yes. I was having this exact conversation in another thread in c/movies not three days ago. The fear of sex is just astounding to me. And it being equated only to porn was more than a little troubling.

  • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lol, If someone puts a gun against my head and says guess the most lied about thing in human history, honest to god I would say, Teens lying About sex.

    For some reason I question the validity of this study.

    • Shou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Dunno. There are better sources too look for sex. Watching a movie with your mates is just awkward.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think that there’s a lot of anxiety more than puritanism. There’s a lot of reasons, but one of them is certainly the growing political divide; women are trending more and more liberal, and men more and more conservative. Women don’t want to get trapped by a man that doesn’t think that she should have rights, while men seem to think that they are ‘owed’ a woman to have their babies (…and how are they going to fucking pay for those kids, when they think their wife is going to stay at home, and they have zero fucking job prospects…?).

          TBH, if I was a woman, I sure as fuck would not want to risk dating men right now.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah I think that anxiety is the reason people don’t want to see it.

            The study also shows that they want escapism and fantasy stories that are only happy more than ever as well.
            Ignoring the harsh bits is the point and the anxiety of the topic of Sex itself is I think the key factor in it being taboo because people want to ignore that which makes them uncomfortable.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Absolutely. Sex is viewed as either a prideful event to be overly open about or a dark hidden secret that only one should do.

          If all we have is extremes no wonder neither side feels very interested in it. It loses the fact that it’s a thing that you just can do. It’s an action that can have lots of intent behind it and some of it is needed for procreation.
          As is now it’s too surrounded by argument.

    • bamfic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is porn now. Everyfuckingwhere. For free. So much porn. Niche porn. Hardcore porn. Fetish porn. You don’t have to jerk off to a lingirie catalog like we did when we were kids. Or sneak National Geographic magazines to see boobs. Sex in movies is just sad, stupid, and often unnecessary tittilation.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        So what, we’re gonna remove gore and action scenes too? I’m not saying sex scenes inherently have more “value” than any other scene, I’m not even arguing they have any “value”, but there are a lot of movies out there that are 90% “unnecessary titillation” in one way, shape, or form.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          So what, we’re gonna remove gore and action scenes too?

          If they are unnecessary to the plot, and add nothing, then yes?

          Sex scenes are fine if they’re important to the plot, and/or they add to the movie or show in a valuable way. It just turns out that ~99% of the time, these scenes are completely unnecessary.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s this.

        I remember walking to the video rental store in the 90s to hire VCR tapes. We always tried to get that ones rated 18+ because there would be some boob stuff. Usually the attendant wouldn’t care.

        Now, fuck. Filtering porn out of my social media feeds is a daily ordeal.

  • pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I remember watching the wolf of wall street on opening day with my parents when I was a teen.

    Based on that experience, I agree, that was so awkward lol

    • sOlitude24k@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      So, way back in the day, when Borat was released, basically my whole household loved it. Then, Bruno was announced! Another movie from the same guy, excellent!

      Wrong.

      I took my mom to go see it. In theaters. I don’t think I can really put into words the awkwardness of sitting through that film.

    • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Bud, imagine your parents taking you as a teen to see Species (1995) because we all thought it was just some sci-fi alien movie…

      • GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        My mom did something similar and dragged 13 year old me and my two younger brothers to go see Saturday Night Fever in theaters because the commercials had dancing and music, so she thought it was a musical.

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Actual no holds barred sex of every sort you wish to see, as often as you wish to see it, a click away on the interwebz, the titillation found by past generations in R rated movies and late night Television, no longer computes, and is wholly unnecessary

    • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      As I said here:

      The fact that you only equate sex/nudity to porn reveals a problem. People today can’t associate sex/nudity on a screen as art, or even just fun, anymore - because in their minds sex/nudity is inextricably tied to porn. The reality is sex/nudity can be fun, dramatic, scary, or funny depending on the context. It can have a place in many kinds of stories, and comparing it to porn is like saying “we have war documentaries so we don’t need war movies.” They are completely different things!!

      It’s disturbing to me that we’re culturally encouraged to find fun in violence but sex needs to be cordoned off to a containment genre and excised from mainstream art.

      Sex is too important to be left to porn.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yea that was my thought too. When I was a teen we had one PC and it was in a shared room. Had to rely on the TV for jerk off material. These days everyone has the whole internet in their pocket. TV is for watching good stories, they can skip the sex scenes.

    • zoostation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Writing a story and having to make my characters not want to have sex because of the existence of an unrelated industry outside the context of their universe.

      Striking out any gambling references in my stories because of the rise of online gambling.

      Then I realize I’ve stupidly written scenes where my characters eat, having forgotten like a stupid hack how many restaurants there are in the real world.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            And also not necessary. You don’t need to see two people fucking to know they’re in love. I assume you don’t need to see your friends fucking to understand that they met someone they’re really into.

            • zoostation@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Nothing is strictly necessary, you can tell instead of show any aspect of a relationship. But if drama is going to show a representative cross section of what human relationships are like, sex will be a part of that like romance and friendship aspects are.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s not about how no drama should show sex. It’s about how it is regularly getting shoehorned in at the expense of story, character development or run time.

                And they don’t show a representative cross-section. Almost all sex in mainstream films is heteronormative and done by beautiful people. There are exceptions, but they are few and far between.

                When we see a proportionally accurate representation of queer sex screens on our scenes, I’ll concede that they’re at least showing a broad representation, even if it does ignore all sorts of sexual kinks that would also need to be represented.

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              What if it’s not about love? Sex can be about many things and for the sake of the story.

              Saying it only happens as the result of a perfect romance story is puritan and not beneficial to demystifying sex as an act that humans do.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                And yet generally they’re romance scenes and not scenes involving lust or rape.

                I am not the one saying it. Hollywood is.

                • Krauerking@lemy.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No you are speaking from a specific point.

                  Poor things had lots of sex, not about love or romance.

                  Teeth, is rape.

                  Even Pretty Woman has a sex scene that is about the lust of the main character with no kissing to show it.
                  There are plenty of examples to prove you wrong as much as you have examples of your point.

                  You are the one saying it cause you are making a broad statement from your perspective ignoring all that doesn’t fit into it. It doesnt make you right to selectively pick your examples because it’s the ones you think of and have a problem with you try to apply to the rest of it.

      • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do you characters take big stinky poops? Because that’s a real thing too. Do they pop pimples on their body or on their partners? The list goes on. There’s an audience for everything, but it’s pretty obvious sex isn’t as much of a driver for movies anymore.

          • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            In what respect? I feel confident in saying many if not most people take some pleasure in a good poop. Perhaps not as much as having sex but the point remains in a critical part of life.

            • zoostation@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Drama is largely about character relationships and sex is a part of that. There’s rarely any drama to our necessary biological functions. Pooping can be part of a story’s plot like sex, just much less often.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Bowel movements are a vastly more important part of one’s life.

  • greenskye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Most of the (supposed) younger generation people I interact with online seem even more prudish and conservative about sex than my very religious parents were growing up. It’s super weird to be the older person who’s ok with sexual content. I don’t really get it.

    And yes, I know people will claim it’s because it’s only when it’s not done right or when it feels shoved in, but honestly from the way they talk about anything dealing with sex, it feels like that’s just an acceptable excuse and they really just don’t want the content to exist at all, even if ‘done right’. It’s like a huge chunk of the generation is asexual or something.

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I get it. Our generation was over exposed and so were they by proxy. They’ve also been listening to us telling them about stds, unwanted pregnancies and all the baggage that comes with sex. They also have so much other stuff to do, we didn’t have as many choices so we got bored, got underage drunk and boned. The younger people also see that it did to us and they don’t want to be like us I guess. A lot more pressure and stress these days to succeed and survive, they’re too busy trying to get educated or just survive

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it has less to do with their attitude on sex, and more to do with the availability of actual porn. I’m an older millenial, and even I’m of the opinion that full on sex scenes very rarely add anything to the plot. Implied sex is often more than enough to do the required plot advancement. If I wanted the sex specifically, I’d just go watch porn.

      • greenskye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I tended to get the impression that implied sex (such as fade to black scenes) were also not appreciated. That effectively they just didn’t want their media to include references to sex pretty much at all.

        Maybe most people are reasonable about it, but online at least it feels a bit like the old Tumblr days, except now these people are super anti sex everything and want to erase all mention of it.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m with you, and I’m worried about it because I see this sexual puritanism as both counter to good efforts of the sexual liberation movement and frankly as a trojan horse for future conservatism to take root.

      I’m of the radical acceptance, not abstaining from the topic mindset on this topic, personally.

      I think a huge part of the problem that not enough people are talking about are these kids grew up in heavily corporate controlled spaces and have begun to confuse advertiser-friendliness for social acceptability, and I think that is a huge problem.

    • dmention7@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I legit can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not, because it perfectly encapsulates the weird way america is so blase about depictions of graphic, gleeful violence while simultaneously being horrified at seeing a nipple.on tv.

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m asexual. I am less interested in a show when it appears to be popular through being needlessly titillating.

        • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not asexual or American (I’m also not a teen, 30) but the fact that baldurs gate 3 has sex in it and everyone talks about it like as if it’s the most important part of the game makes me want to play it less. Sex seems weird to be in such a world.

          Sometimes i wish media would just focus more on what mattered to what it is, because for the amount I hear of it bg3 seems to be a fantasy romance simulator.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            People just talk about who their fave picks are to romance, but it’s not all the game is about. You still learn more about the characters as you grow close to them if you aren’t romancing them.

          • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            They’re pretty easy to not engage with, and for me they felt less awkward than almost any other video game sex scene.

            People always focus on the romances, but I feel like you could take them out completely and still have pretty much the same great game.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What you didn’t want to see a dude fuck his sister, a dude rape a teenager, or a little dude fuck a bunch of prostitutes?

      For all the time GRRM spends describing sex, he really goes out of his way to make it as fucked up as possible.

    • teamshinanagin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I watched game of thrones and enjoyed the ride. I think this is more okay because you know what you’re getting into. I have to be in the mood for a bunch of crazy violence and sex and if I am would watch game of thrones. Probably the push back is jamming it into ever thing they possibly can.

  • xep@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Center for Scholars & Storytellers (CSS), based in the Psychology Department at the University of California, Los Angeles, designed Teens and Screens to investigate American adolescents’ perspective about the media they engage with and consume. This yearly study aims to elevate the voices of adolescents, hoping to have an impact on the media landscape that’s a part of their daily lives. We are grateful to the Funders of Adolescent Science Translation (FAST), the Walt Disney Company, and Roblox for their support of this independent research.

    Specifically, American teenagers.

  • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have argued this a bunch of times at this point, but movies should choose a target demographic and then go for it:

    • Make family friendly movies without awkward implied sex under covers or while wearing underwear and such nonsense. Something that I can watch with family without it getting awkward

    OR

    • make adult, explicit movies where the actors are actually, explicitly, visibly fucking during sex scenes. Doesnt have to be straight up porn, just make sex scenes sex scenes.

    TLDR: Make actual family friendly movies without, and actually adult and explicit movies with. The middle of the road stuff makes it awkward and/or unsatisfying for everyone present

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sex scenes peaked when Tommy Wiseau passionately made love to a belly button and you can’t tell me differently.

      • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Charlotte Gainsbourg cutting off her clit with a pair of scissors in Antichrist was the absolute depth of the valley of sex scenes.

        Jesus fuck that movie was not sexy. But, the sex is what made that movie. A horrific, depressing, Lars von Trier trauma device.

        On a lighter note: when I was working at a local film festival, I got to meet Greg Sestero and watch a showing of the room followed by a q&a.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Lars von Trier understands the ugly side of sex, which is why his sex scenes work so well in his films. The sex scenes in Breaking the Waves were definitely needed. They were also pretty hard to watch.