• florge@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    AI isn’t going to come with a new magic solution to global warming, it’s going to come with the same solutions we already have. Solutions which we should already be doing, but instead we’re listening to these fucks with too much money.

    • xploit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If actual scientists were in charge, and maybe had some ideas that they weren’t certain would work but sounded promising, which could be theoretically tested with AI - there would be hope.
      But none of these fuckers would allow anyone with more than half a brain cell near it, because “investment and growth and blablabla”

      Then again, we could just do that with existing supercomputers and all these power hungry AI crap companies’ resources (I’m sure some supercomputers do get used for the modelling already)…instead of whatever the fuck they’re trying to do now.

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Schmidt promises that these AI companies will make energy generation systems at least 15% more efficient or maybe even better, telling the audience that “that’s a lot of money for a utility.”

        He’s not even trying to be subtle about it.

        • ramble81@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I would love to drop these guys into a post scarcity society where their money means jack shit and see how they react.

          • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Can you drop me there first, please?

            I promise to be suitably wowed. Also, I’ll film them for you. Sacrifices for the greater good or whatever.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The only thing we should use AI for is to replace CEOs. AI can spit out inane bullshit at a fraction of the cost of a CEO.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course it will. Simple: build a bunch of killer robots to exterminate 90% of humanity. Problem solved.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s an advanced AI. Surely it can do an Israel and remotely detonate the smartphones of the people it doesn’t need anymore.

    • Exec@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do you think that they’ll listen to that then? No, they’ll just say that “the models are wrong” and continue to use up even more energy.

      • Emi@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It would just end up like in the Love death and robots episode When the Yogurt Took Over. They wouldn’t listen and just do their own thing.

    • Melt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      AI will solve it if they give AI the wheel. And I’m sure one of the first thing it’ll do is eliminating all humans

    • paw@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Additionally, if AI actually gives us this answer, tge answer we have already now, will we as a global society actualky implement it, because it sounds inconvenient (at least for some) or will we say, hey the AI seems to have made a mistake.