• IDrawPoorly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    I mean, people have already created the majority of their good games from scratch so…

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      There are a lot of fangames that contain regions and their Pokemon from original games, with some enhancements. You could try these.

    • Dremor@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Probably not, that’d be piracy, and I’m sure that Nintendo will sue them to hell. 😅

      • 🏴Akuji@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        @Dremor@lemmy.world and @simple@lemm.ee.

        I’m surely talking out of my rear-end, but isn’t possible for an eventual developer to go the way of the SM64 port: having to provide a rom in order to get the assets? As far as I know, those responsible of said port haven’t been bothered by Nintendo.

        • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Tor is only as safe and as secure as the person using it.

          Most people think just installing Tor and running protects them and their identity. Most don’t even look at things like DNS leaks or think a VPN plus Tor helps, that being said. Tor and Mullvad are probably as private and as secure as you can get by default.

            • shininghero@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 days ago

              Definitely, you don’t need a VPN. If you’re really worried about your first hop traffic standing out or being blocked, use the obfs4 bridges.

    • simple@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Technically yes but I doubt anyone would go through the effort only to be sued into oblivion.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    In my head this is a retribution for financing hackers that attacked Internet Archive and nobody can convince me otherwise

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        It’s like Lenin said, you look for the person who will benefit… And, uh… You know, you’ll, uh… You know what I mean.

        The Dude

        „Who benefits the most” from attacking Internet Archive? Big copyright holders whose content was distributed via Internet Archive. The reason given by the group claiming responsibility is so silly I don’t believe it.

        [edit] I’ll add to this comment so that I don’t have to reply to everyone specifically.

        I don’t believe that if you wanted to attack USA (as people claiming responsibility did) you’d attack it in a way that benefits big corporations most. It sounds like a flimsy distraction from true perpetrators.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          You can believe what you want, but there’s absolutely no way you would be correct. Any large company sponsoring a cyber attack, if caught, would be nailed to the wall and made an example of. The extreme risks are simply not worth the comparatively small reward of reducing a tiny fraction of piracy.

          A more realistic and reasonable avenue would have been to sponsor the companies going after IA for copyright infringement as a result of them loaning out unlimited digital copies of books without DRM.

          • misk@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            This is a very valid point, yet companies do shady stuff all the time and some even get caught via subpoenas and such. Nintendo can do it in a way that will never be noticeable on their books for sure.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          For those curious, this account on Xitter claimed responsibility. Their stated reasons are indeed ridiculous, but I don’t at all have a hard time believing that people can be that misguided.

    • ronflex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      This is a conspiracy theory I’m completely behind. With all the moves Nintendo has made recently this was the first thing I thought when Internet Archive was compromised

    • Jomega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      I swear to god, the Lemmy hive mind is even more intense than their predecessor.

      • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        That’s like whining that everyone hates Blizzard or Ubisoft because of some hive mind mentality. Could it be that maybe it’s just a commonly hated company based off their unethical actions over the last 10+ years?

        • Jomega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          Here’s the difference though: most people outside of Lemmy don’t care about Nintendo’s copyright lawsuits enough that it’s the only thing they talk about whenever they hear the name. The fact that every comment expresses the same thing is the part that feels like a hive mind. Some criticism of a large corporation is one thing, but how strongly Lemmy holds that opinion feels cultish. Blizzard’s leadership protects sex abusers and Ubisoft has had a work culture many describe as nightmarish for decades. Seeing Nintendo put on that level for something not even unique to them makes me think some of you don’t know what nuance or perspective are.

          • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            23 days ago

            I disagree. Nintendo isn’t just some company that has legal beef and comparing their shitiness with Blizzard’s is like comparing apples to oranges.

            Nintendo is a litigious bully and patent troll that has a long, long list of hurting the fans that love their games. They don’t just settle for cease and desists, they historically ruin people’s lives (see Gary Bowser). What feels even worse about Nintendo is the complete misaligned of their product/ brand vs. how they treat fans. You can point to similar companies like Disney and I say that yes, I would happily cheer on any misfortune that comes to them with the same fervor as Nintendo.

            • Jomega@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 days ago

              comparing their shitiness with Blizzard’s is like comparing apples to oranges.

              That’s… what I said.

              My point is supposed to be that Lemmy acts as a though they’re the devil, when in reality they’re just the regular amount of corporate shitty. All of what you said is true, and I’m not trying to convince you it isn’t. It just feels surreal how every comment in here is the same, like it’s the same person behind every username. I get no sense of individuality here, ya know ?

              • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                22 days ago

                But that whole argument follows the logical fallacy “whataboutism” to downplay X because Y and Z also do bad things. Just because you perceive something to be in line with a standard baseline of corporate shitiness doesn’t mean it’s not worth criticizing.

                As for individualism, it’s no secret that lemmy is somewhat left leaning which contributes to the general vibe. From my experience there is a lot more nuance and depth to the discussions that happen here when factoring in population size compared to other similar areas of the internet.

      • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Wow, everyone left another platform and were inspired to leave for the same reason, as a group. Now they’re showing extreme similarities in other ways! When will the madness stop??!

      • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        I know you’re being downvoted, but I had the same thought. I see more outcry over nintendo than other companies. Yes, Nintendo has done bad things, but if I were to go back and browse Reddit I feel like the level of hate on Lemmy is much higher. I have to assume it’s due to the open source nature of Lemmy and it’s ideals.

    • Farid@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      You can’t patent code, and it’s automatically copyright protected. Nintendo just needs to prove they wrote the code originally, which should be easy.

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        You can patent the features that the code makes up.

        Also, Nintendo has patented features existing in other games long before, and it hasn’t stopped them. The current lawsuit against palworld contains patent claims for features they do not actually own, which is why they need 100 different lawsuits coming their way so they get a taste of their own medicine.

        They have an easy time suing one or two entities, but 100 different ones will have a significant economic impact.

    • excral@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Not a native speaker, but to me it sounds correct in this context, since it’s about the source codes of multiple games (versus the source code of a singular game/project). Similar to how “peoples” can be a correct plural when talking about multiple groups of people.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      It’s a huge deal for hardcore fans, but I am overall against these practices, since they are just illegal, period.

        • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Why wouldn’t torrenting the source code of proprietary software would be a legal issue? I don’t care of you do it but I’m curious why you only think it’s a moral issue.

              • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                22 days ago

                What did I get flipped?

                Legality vs morality

                Why wouldn’t torrenting the source code of proprietary software would be a legal issue?

                It would be a legal issue. But it’s not a moral issue, which is why so few people are showing sympathy for Nintendo. They lose nothing if someone gets a copy of the code - there’s no victim. They do however have a LONG reputation for weaponizing the legal system by attacking fans with frivolous lawsuits - those DO have a victim, and are therefore a moral issue with Nintendo as the aggressor.

                But regardless of context, again don’t conflate legality with morality. Ever. History is absolutely stuffed with atrocities that adhere to established law, that doesn’t make those atrocities okay. Videogame code is pretty minescule compared to legal attrocities like slavery or the holocost etc, but point remains that the law in-and-of-itself doesn’t mean shit.

                Also fuck Nintendo.

              • smeg@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                22 days ago

                I think their point is that you said “but I am overall against these practices, since they are just illegal”, as in you’re against something because it’s illegal not because it’s immoral

                • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  22 days ago

                  Thank you for clearing up my confusion. I felt I missed something. (Also, I didn’t post that, I was just confused by the one who replied to it.)

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Also design documents like the dude that mated with an octillery lol. The concept of people and pokemon breeding was still referenced in sinoh, but in a way tamer way.

  • missingno@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    I’ve been holding onto a pet conspiracy theory that BW2 was a last-minute change from Gray, loose ends and plot holes felt too rushed. Curious if the leaked source code will corroborate this.

  • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Next headline “Hackers disappointed that the hacked source code is apparently just the same as the last 16 games”