There is a young woman sheltering under a tree between two busy roads clutching a pile of documents to her chest.

These pieces of paper are more important to Bibi Nazdana than anything in the world: they are the divorce granted to her after a two-year court battle to free herself from life as a child bride.

They are the same papers a Taliban court has invalidated - a victim of the group’s hardline interpretation on Sharia (religious law) which has seen women effectively silenced in Afghanistan’s legal system.

Nazdana’s divorce is one of tens of thousands of court rulings revoked since the Taliban took control of the country three years ago this month.

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      WTF? That’s like saying a Democrat’s wet dream would be for Israel to be wiped off the planet…

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, the GOP wants checks notes the exact same thing but using a different religion to justify it. Totally different.

    • OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, the last GOP president literally handed the country back to the Taliban - so less of a dream, and more of a conservative “success” story.

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        In their defense the previous government was a puppet government installed and propped up by the US. It wasn’t particularly popular and could never sustain itself without direct foreign military support.

        • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It was a löst cause, in the end, no one wanted to pay for reconfiguring traditions and values that were made up a long time ago

          • bamboo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I mean when you put it that way, it’s still morally dubious. Not saying that the culture is great or anything, but who are we to say that it is so inferior that it must be eliminated and replaced with our superior ones? It’s cultural genocide.

            • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              It was never replaced, rather reformed. Is it just to have women as second class citizens? To exclude them from school and all other education?

              I still feel it would’ve been justified to stay, these things tend to spread when they are allowed to exist