• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m sorry, but I don’t have a grand to throw at a single fucking processor. I can put together a whole computer for that kind of coin.

  • anhydrous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    For me, it’s because:

    • I have a 5950X and it seems pointless to upgrade from there. Sure the new stuff is faster, but disproportionately so for the price. I would need to replace a bunch of components.
    • I recently upgraded to 128GB RAM, and it was cheaper to do that with DDR4
    • I’ve had 2 faulty Ryzen processors (1700X, then my first 5950X), and I’ve learned to wait until the kinks are ironed out.
  • barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Would have to buy new board and RAM, not really worth it performance-wise, at least not for me. Some day, yes, but that day hasn’t come and will definitely be after a GPU upgrade.

  • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m still using a i7-3630QM and a R5-1600.

    They are both enough for what I do with them. Why would I upgrade?

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What are you using your computer for?? Just web browsing or something‽ I just upgraded from an i5-6600k/1060 setup and for like the past year and some change I’ve been hitting 100% CPU usage with just a few programs open, not even gaming lol

      And that was with a CPU 3 generations newer lmao

      • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Sounds like some bad software or something extra CPU intensive then. I use R5 2600 on W11 and it can handle everything I need with ease like web browsing (depending on pages and tab count it can be quite demanding), at least 3 VMs at the same time (2 Windows, 1 Linux), gaming, video transcoding. All that is not happening at the same time, but I can’t remember last time I checked Task Manager to see what is using my CPU.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The R5 2600 is not only newer than my old i5 and faster, it also has a LOT more threads (12 vs 4) and an extra 2 full cores

          Making it excellent for the multi threaded workloads (VMs) and leaving room for non-multithreaded optimized workloads

          I have an RTSP client program running all the time displaying a handful of camera feeds. It had a ~45-55% average CPU usage even with GPU decoding/encoding enabled on it.

          That same piece of software on my much newer 7600 changing absolutely nothing else software wise (I just dropped in the SSD from my old build) that same software barely cracks 5%

          iCUE (for Corsair RGB control (yes I know there’s open source versions I just never got around to it lol)) had a similar story with ~30-40% before and barely 4% now

      • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Gaming, working (data processing, physical modelling).

        The trick is to use a lower overhead OS than Windows.

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Gaming is one thing, a lot is GPU bound anyways, probably the same with “physical modeling”

          But you cannot tell me your “data processing” would not be greatly sped up by using a newer proc (assuming it’s not also GPU bound). Does it work, sure, but if it takes you 2 hours for it to process now but <30 minutes on something newer that’s just a waste of time, resources and money. It’s incredibly inefficient.

          On the flip side, if all your work is GPU bound no wonder a 3rd gen proc from 2012 is keeping up lol

  • Peffse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m waiting on the new X870 chipset boards to come out. Why buy an old board with a new processor?

  • xonigo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I got an 5800x3d and 64gb of ddr4. I see no need to jump up to a new CPU and invest in ddr5 memory yet. The performance benefit is only a few percent just isn’t worth the upgrade in my opinion

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The 5950X is now pretty midrange when it comes to some desktop benchmarks, but mine is still serving me well and I don’t feel I’m hitting the limits of the CPU. If I were shopping now I’d certainly find that price appealing for what it offers. I’m not considering Intel these days, but the price premium on latest-generation AMD CPUs is high.

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s one of the latest my mobo can handle AFAIK, and i like to maximize my hardware for longevity (one of the reasons i prefer AMD over Intel, their CPU generations span multiple sockets).

        Also, not a gamer.

        • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, I went up to a 5950x a while back from a 3600 for the same reason: it was the best CPU I could get without upgrading motherboard and RAM. And I hardly ever play games. Looking at the performance benchmarks it seems the X3D stuff actually slows down non-gaming workloads a bit (perhaps because it increases temperatures), so I don’t feel the need to chase after that tech.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wouldn’t say nobody, but most people with a working Zen 4 don’t see the need.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      And they’re the only people who can easily do it.

      Anybody else needs a new motherboard and RAM. And for those people, they’re like “hmmm I can spend $700+ upgrading to Zen5, or I could spend $180 on a 5700X3D, not have to pull my entire PC apart, and get about the same real-world performance because I’ll be GPU bottlenecked anyway.”

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’d think there would be some value-add in cranking out the older chips faster and at a lower price point, rather than aiming for a marginal improvement in spec that nobody has a use for yet.

  • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m currently in the market for a new CPU for my PC, so I did my research and I’m not going to buy a Zen 5 CPU either. The reason is simple: The Zen 4 X3D CPUs are faster. Because of that, everyone who wants a new CPU now is getting the Zen 4 X3Ds and everyone who can wait, is waiting for the Zen 5 X3Ds. There’s no point in getting the Zen 5 CPUs that are currently out.

    Edit: Actually, after reading the top reply, I’m not sure anymore if the Zen 5s aren’t the better choice after all

  • ghashul@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I bought a 7800x3d, so I’m not in the market for a new CPU for years to come. If I hadn’t already bought it, I’d buy it now.

    • sploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ditto. 7800X3D is a beast for games and I don’t give half a shit about productivity performance on my gaming machine. I got mine for around $350 early this year and I’m absolutely floored that it’s now over $400. That’s not the direction things are supposed to go.

      I think we may be in the last generations of x86’s desktop and laptop dominance. All phones and now all Macs run on ARM-based chips and they do just fine while sipping watts, compared to x86’s two big proponents both having faltering launches on their latest generations with ever higher TDPs where you only get more processing power by using more electrical power.