I know it’s been getting worse over time, but I could still find what I needed after some digging.

Recently it’s been like 10 minutes of adjusting search terms, still getting completely useless or irrelevant results, and me just giving up afterwards. Other search engines seem just as bad.

  • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are many factors at play here, some of which including:

    • AI content is taking over the Web: with the popularization of LLM tools, there’s an increasing number of AI-Generated content across the Web. Even press websites are using them for generating news and opinion articles.
    • Old sites/articles are vanishing from existence: for instance, old blogs and personal web pages, which contained a lot of useful information, are being deleted due to factors such as domain expiration, hosting expiration, insufficient web traffic for the host to keep it online, etc. To make things worse, few of these sites were archived with tools such as Internet Archive and Archive Today, meaning that, when they disappear, they really disappear.
    • Dominance of Reddit-owned contents and the Reddit issues: Reddit doesn’t need introductions, most of the questions and content used to come from Reddit posts and comments. Things such as people (understandably) deleting their Reddit accounts make content to disappear as well.
    • SEO bs and marketing spam: Google kept changing “page ranking” algorithms, sorting results according to their own will. “Search Engine Optimization” is a just a facade that led many old sites to practically vanish from search result pages. Advertisement also did harm many sites as well, even the bigger ones.
    • Societal, economical and human changes: there were lots of changes upon society and humans by the last 5 years. These worldly factors also influence the digital landscape.

    That said, it depends on what you’re searching for. If you’re searching for knowledge that used to be at old websites, you can use Marginalia to search this specific type of websites (considering that they’re still online).

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I stopped using it last year it got so bad, I ended up using DDG but that’s gotten shit and I’ve found myself back on Google. To me it feels 10% better than it was when I stopped.

    Although everyone’s experiences with Google are so different we’re probably all being A/B tested.

  • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    *years? Yes. It used to be the bleeding edge of search and now it’s just profit driven enshittification like the rest of ai-ridden garbage tech wallstreet bullshit.

    • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It has definitely been getting worse over years, but I specifically meant the last couple of weeks. I could still find what I needed between all the garbage… now I can’t even find it after adjusting the search multiple times.

    • Linnce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The other day I asked google what season we were in. The AI got it wrong, and that’s like the simplest question ever.

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The results are usually the most clicked, not necessarily the factual links. Others have recommended kagi. I haven’t tried it yet. I remember when the internet started and you had to use them all!

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Incognito is on your client side browser in that the browser doesn’t retain any trace of the current session once you close the tab. The search engine still knows what you whacked off to.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can’t have? Or you can’t be sure?
          Because you certainly can have. Just because you pay, doesn’t mean they will log your searches. In fact Kagi claim they don’t. And since their only income comes from paying users. If anyone ever found out they’re lying about that, they’d quickly loose a big chink of subscribers and income. As well as get sued for fraud. So it’s rather unlikely they do.

          Unlike every other search provider, Kagi is the only one with a business model that ensures it’s users are the customer, not the product. When actually using it every day, that’s quite obvious in the results. Even when you search for a company directly, it’s Wikipedia entry is usually the first result. The the company site is the second.

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Not being sure was part of my point. We can’t be sure. But all their incentives are aligned in the right way. That’s the best we can hope for. And better than any alternative right now.

              • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I understand the sunk cost fallacy, but I truly think you should read that entire page, friend… That’s all I’ll say though! :)

                • Tinks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  How many times are you going to post that link? We have seen it, and at this point you’re just spamming.

                  We get it, you don’t like Kagi. Stop spamming the thread.

        • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          True Incognito mode is a myth, it only stops keeping a history in the tab of that browser. Everytime you use a browser to go to any site ever, the browser logs you went there. So does your ISP and the site your connecting to. No matter which mode or browser you use, if you go to Google, then Google knows you went there and logs your searches.

          The closest you can come to browsing the web anonymously would be with a mix of dedicated privacy OS like Tails and either a VPN or Tor as a middile man, but that assumes those proxys are not corrupted. Free VPNs make money by selling your “secret browsing” habits.

          The internet is nothing more than wires, if you connect your wire to someone elses, every intermediatary knows.

          • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You can use uBlock Origin and other privacy add-ons to block tracking and a VPN to hide your IP address but if you’re logged in to a search engine’s account then everything you search is tied to you no matter what you do.

                • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  A vpn is not a proxy and cannot do anything to protect you beyond changing your exit point. You are not anonymous using a vpn, especially not with any vpn that has servers in a five eyes country.

        • ironsoap@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          True, but worth reading their about page and privacy page. Not saying it’ll stay this way, but the way they are running is something that makes more sense then being sold as a product to Google. And you aren’t getting much of an incognito these days with all the fingerprinting they are doing.

          I will admit kagi search isn’t the highest performer, but it’s viable. DDG, Start page, etc. Might give you more privacy, or not (hard to tell with DDG these days), but it might be worth trying a different model for a while.

          I miss the days when the internet was truly free, but in lieu of that we have to have something better. Kagi is a start.

    • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve used Kagi’s free trial. I’d turn to it when nothing else was helping and it did really well, but recently it hasn’t been helping either. It’s probably still fine for most things, but I’m often searching niche developer/programming things that are too burried under SEO/AI spam to find anymore.

      • sudneo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        FWIW, the default “programming” lens works quite well in Kagi, you can also create your own lens if you have a set of websites from which you routinely search info, and there are tons of bangs already (which can also be mapped to lenses BTW). In addition, you can downrank AI/SEO stuff when you find it (it is downranked by default in kagi), so that over time your results are quite clean.

    • Skeezix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The problem with DDG is if it doesn’t find results it just ignores your search terms and throws whatever shit it wants at you.

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          unless you switch on verbatim mode

          Which I’m just hearing about now. So clearly they don’t wnst us using it.

      • Quik@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh my god, I feel this so much… Also, I think that recently got even worse, as I recently found myself switching between DDG/Google and finding both extremely bad for my query

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes!

          It think it got suddenly so much worse recently. Glad to see I’m not alone, something must’ve e changed.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I know it’s being overly recommended in here, but kagi pretty much gives you exactly what you want. I’ve had very few times it’s been unable to give me my search in the first few results. Others swear by SearXNG

          • Quik@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah, I’ve recently switched to SearXNG instances on some devices, definitely seem to be getting better results

        • starchylemming@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          does it also straight up ignore special commands like -whatever i could swear you could use that on many sites and it worked as "exclude this "

  • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve been using Kagi since ~February and it’s changed my views on Search. Beforehand, if use a combination of Google, Bing, DDG, and Brave and rarely find what I needed in satisfactory time. Now I’m typically finding it in the top 5 without all the cruft + have access to a handful of LLM assistants to choose from for other tasks (when needed).

    I’ve also heard good things about SearXNG.

  • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It took me. 12 minutes of clicking through websites yesterday to get the heat and time settings for making potato chips in the air fryer. I used to be able to just ask the Google Assistant.

    I’m glad I saw this post cuz I was going to gaslighting myself over the whole thing. It really is getting way worse, isn’t it…

    What search engine alternatives do y’all use?

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is what I call the linux bubble. People who use linux and are used to alternate solutions, which may offer better performance than the norm. Then they surround themselves with other like minded people. So much so that they begin to forget that they are using alternatives rather than the norm. Despite what benefits they gain from alternatives, some people can’t grasp that they are, in fact, alternatives.

        Twitter has 368 million monthly users. I find it to be a cesspool of hate, racism, and right wing agenda.

        So you would think mastodon or bluesky would have equal or better numbers.

        Bluesky has 9.7 million monthly users, which includes a huge recent boost because of brazil ceasing twitters ability to operate. I think that alone was 2 million users.

        And mastodon has 975,000 monthly users.

        So yes, despite it’s flaws, twitter is still the default in microblogging. By a LOT. But I’m sure the feeling around here is “who still uses twitter???”.

        Everybody. Same way everybody uses google. Same way everybody uses instagram. And it’s not even close to being close.

        • abbadon420@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The fact I’m most flabbergasted about is that only a third of people use password managers by default. An independent American surveysource: bitwarden over 2000 “random” Internet users shows 34% use a password manager. The randomness of this survey is probably skewed, which would make the total percentage even lower in actuality.

          • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Which is insane since they’ve mostly been using iOSs or Androids built in password manager for as long as that’s been a thing on both. Doubt they even realize that’s what it is though.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Probably 99%. This question was only meant to be taken as “I am above the common pleb, those idiots”

    • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You honestly though the most used search engine has been abandoned by everyone? Maybe share what you’re using instead of just being pretentious?

      • NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I totally honestly believed that. I’m just so naive, how do I get by in life? Thank goodness you’re here to set me straight. What would I do without you? How did you get so good at computers? You must be some kind of wizard.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was honestly getting so frustrated the other day at work when searching for something very specific and coming up empty handed. Tried DuckDuckGo and even fucking Bing and found what I needed in a matter of seconds. Google search is trash now. I have to go to the second page or further just to find something that isn’t an ad, AI response, or reddit. None of which are helpful.

  • tobyond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Google Maps is utter crap lately too. It seems to be making up locations, and several times in the past month, it’s taken me to the wrong place. It’s getting almost as bad as Apple Maps

    • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I went to a low data plan and learned that Google Maps consumes a vast amount of data (relative to my plan limit), and I download all my maps and had location off. 1 single bus route between two pinned locations was 30Mb. Maps and search could be so simple but they are insanely bloated.

    • TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Oh god, yes this too. All the sponsored location spam drives me crazy. I love when I zoom in to a location and it doesn’t mark ANY of the shops besides STARBUCKStm

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Hey now, Apple Maps is more accurate, provides better directions where I am, has more up to date satellites imagery, and has been this way for years. I only use Google Maps to search because Yelp is god awful. I live in a rapidly expanding area and all of that matters.

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Apple Maps is fantastic for navigation, but it doesn’t have enough locations on it. I use Gmaps for searching locations and apple for navigating.

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My favorite one recently is constantly telling me to keep straight to remain on a highway like 7 times before I need to actually get off the highway. Glad I turned off the sound a long time ago otherwise I would have lost my fucking mind.

      • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        We have express (toll) lanes on some highways around me, and the navigation system loses its damn mind every time. “Keep going straight”, “continue going straight”, “proceed in a trajectory perpendicular to your current trajectory”; I fucking get it!

  • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    yes. use any of the following, in no particular order:

    • ecosia.org - A non-profit certified B corp that plants trees by serving ads in your search results. Bing search underneath.
    • duckduckgo.com - A privacy friendly search engine. Primarily sourced from Bing but mixes in a few other sources.
    • any SearXNG instance - A self-hostable search front-end to various search engines.
    • marginalia.nu - specifically ‘random’ - An independent DIY search engine that focuses on non-commercial content, and attempts to show you sites you perhaps weren’t aware of in favor of the sort of sites you probably already knew existed.
  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    HAHAHAHAHAH no. Google Search has gotten so much worse in the last couple of YEARS more like.

    The reason behind this is not a bug but a feature. Google wants the trip from search to result to take longer as they can show you more ads that way.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve started to use Qwant a few months ago when bing and duckduckgo started to give me result I had filtered out in my search. But now it is way past this stage. When I look for something I find a lot of related topic but nothing about the topic I’ve searched for.
    I notice it was suddently become much worst about 10~15 days ago