Wikepedia states

“Much like today’s socially acceptable terms idiot and moron, which are also defined as some sort of mental disability, when the term retard is being used in its pejorative form, it is usually not being directed at people with mental disabilities. Instead, people use the term when teasing their friends or as a general insult.”

Is it only a slur if directed at soneone with mental disabilities? Is it a slur if durected at onself?

Whats lemmies take on this?

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s a slur now. Before it was an insult.

    One day redneck and hillbilly will be considered slurs too, Mark my words.

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s absolutely a slur. And (IMO) one of the worst ones. Nothing infuriates me more.

  • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Let’s go through examples:

    “He’s retarded” - that’s a slur, unless it’s ironic.

    “That was retarded” - not a slur, cause it’s kinda taking a dig at an action, not a person.

    “I’m retarded” - technically a slur but almost always used with a hint of irony, therefore usually not a slur.

    That’s how I use the word with my friends. And I have autism, so technically 100 years ago I would have been the resident retard ;)

    • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Utterly incorrect. Irony does not affect whether a thing is a slur or not. It doesn’t matter what you use the slur towards, it remains a slur. Any excuse you use to explain why you can use a slur is exactly that: an excuse.

      • Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Youre right that irony doesnt stopbit being a slur, but usage absolutely matters. Unless you think its inexcusable black people using the n word with each other? Context is incredibly important.

        • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just to make it clear, I am white, so take my opinion on this with a grain of salt.

          From what I understand, there isn’t a universal consensus among black communities that the n-word is okay between black people. Some people get just as offended no matter who says it.

          Of course, some people are perfectly fine with it, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t a slur. It’s still a slur, it’s just not offending anyone at that moment. It’s like an empty gun: it won’t harm anyone, but it’s still a gun.

          • Womble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Any excuse you use to explain why you can use a slur is exactly that: an excuse.

            I guess that is what I take issue with, that statement makes it sounds like any use of a slur is always wrong regardless of context and that any reason for using it is just to wiggle out of you being a bad person.

            • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I mean, it might be a good excuse. Doesn’t change the slur.

              In Blazing Saddles, the actors playing the racists apologised to their co-stars after every take. They had a damn good excuse to say what they said, but they still apologised for saying it.

    • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What’s wrong with someone having cognitive difficulties? Why do you feel the need to use the word as a descriptor for negative things?

      • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago
        • nothing. I have autism. There’s nothing wrong with me, but I’m obviously a little bit different like other people, which in itself is neither good nor bad.

        • because we need a descriptor and that’s just what my friends use; we know what we mean with it and what we don’t.

        Also I’m gonna take those questions at face value, but I’m just gonna note the first question is a bit out out of left field, as no one implied that something’s wrong with that.

        But I don’t wanna assume you are an asshole, so I’m gonna take it as a misunderstanding.

        • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The way I usually see it playing out is that people usually call things are negative “reatarded” (e.g. “This app is retarded!”, “Wow, I thought that tomato was a fruit, lmao I’m still retarded!”). It just pushes the negative stereotypes associated with it. I don’t know if that’s what you are doing, but that’s how I see a lot of “stop being sensitive bros” do it.

          I know its easy to say that every one who hears you talk fully understands precisely what you mean, but do they? I’ve seen stories of people who “ironically” use racial slurs and didn’t realise that it resulted in most of their friends turning out to be actual racists. Likewise, are you pushing away would-be friends who don’t want to associate with people who casually throw out slurs? That’s ignoring the impact of saying it in a public place, where victims of abuse can hear it.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes, it’s explicitly made to compare to people with developmental disorders who are even to this day bullied with this word. Don’t use it.

      • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Can you imagine walking up to a stranger in a wheel chair and saying something like; “Hey cripple, your legs don’t work?”

        Is cripple a slur? Not really (imo) but you dehumanise someone with words and reduce them to only be their affliction. Eliminating everything about them that might be special and individual.

      • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They’re not properly referred to by that word. They USED to be referred to by that word back when they (falsely) believed that such disorders made them inferior.

        Classifying those who were mentally less-developed as “retarded” became the excuse for a world that would try all types of monstrous experiments, ostensibly in an attempt to “heal them” because this was they only way “those people” could be a use to society; as lab rats for things like lobotomies, electro-shock therapy and any other wacky insanity that the early 20th century had dreamed up.

        In effect, while “retarded” was once the so-called medical terminology it very quickly became shorthand for an entire group of people that could be dismissed and used because they’d serve no other purpose otherwise.

        • bastion@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Mental retardation is no excuse for abuse. But it’s still an apt term, in denotation. But the connotation has become unacceptable.

          A plant’s growth may be retarded due to various conditions, and that may interfere with it’s prospects for survival.

          Fire retardant may prevent a fire from starting, or stop one that has started to develop.

          But when considering people, there are a whole slew of subtle problems, including that people may include that in their identity, and give up. They can be treated, possibly, but that’s all for them now. You’re a retard. It leaves no room for other things. People still feel this way about some diagnoses that, if they didn’t lean into them so hard, leave plenty of room for change. But the social weight behind “retard” just carries too much crap, and speaks volumes - some of which may be true, but a lot of which is not.

          ‘Disabled’, ‘undeveloped’, and ‘inhibited’ can be good terms. But most of it depends more heavily on how we treat others and what has been taken into common use.

  • vinnymac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Slurs should not be excusable when directed at oneself.

    For example, if you were to say “I am a retard” in front of someone with a disability, who may have been labeled as such throughout their life, how do you imagine they would feel about that?

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Disagreed. As a certified lifelong retard with the papers to back it up medically, I will never relinquish my right to refer to myself however I want. If someone else takes offense, it’s 100% on them.

      Remember, offense is always taken, never given.

      • tomi000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Exactly. Responsibility always lies with the recipient, you cant blame me for punching your face, its your pain. I didnt rape you, you got yourself raped.

        • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Lol equating words with physical actions. Guess us retards are in good company here. Have a seat.

          • greencactus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            While you may have the right to call yourself what you want, you shouldn’t use it in an “us” context. At least I wouldn’t be okay with it.

      • eatthecake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Remember, offense is always taken, never given.

        If you believe this idiot semantic nonsense then you really are a retard.

  • ABCDE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Yes, but, like any language, it can be used in different contexts and with different effects.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    All slurs should be “acceptable”. Words only have the power attributed to them by humans. (Other) humans can choose to wield that power, to change it, or to leave it be. But policing language is never the answer; people will always find ways around it anyway, and 1984 warned us of the results of having language policed to an extensive degree.

    I’m sure some cunt will take issue with this stance, so to them I say in advance: suck my goddamn dick from balls to shaft and then go die in a ditch, bitch.

  • klemptor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think it might be generational. That word has always been part of my vocabulary. I’ve got no problem whatsoever with it, and if I’m being really honest I have a hard time taking it seriously when someone refers to it as “the R word”. I would never use it to refer to someone with an actual intellectual disability - that would be cruel. But normal people who do dumb shit, or even inanimate objects that malfunction? Sure, all the time, because I don’t mean it in a literal way. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes, do not use it.

    Language is naturally evolving and changing. I used to use it before because there was a legit biological/ medical/ psychiatrical usage of it (short for “retarded mental growth”). Now, that legitness got buried in the common hate speech we knew today.

    To avoid confusion, better just let it go. OR, use it only in convo with a group of med- /bio- nerds.

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I take slight issue with every demand to not use a specific word. I think the better advice here would be to simply suggest not calling people names to begin with. It’s not what you call them that’s the issue, but rather the intention to offend in the first place.

  • fart_pickle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think you answered your own question. You asked about “retard”, not about R-word. Some snowflakes will get offended on behalf other people but normal people will just acknowledge rude language and move on.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    To me, it’s no different from idiot and moron. I’ve been watching how the politically correct movement have been making people afraid to use retard. I’m sure they are coming for the words idiot and moron also at some point, and they are going to argue that there is no need to ever use words like that.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Had a reddit post deleted for using retard as a verb, as in, “Have you tried retarding the action, maybe it’s too fast?”

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because people today don’t question what they are being told. Is it a good idea to ban words? I don’t think so.

    • tomi000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Good for you that you are privileged enough to say such bullshit. Try making your friends use your name as an insult and see how it feels

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Think about this for a second. What if I am offended by the word “trumpet” because it reminds me of Trump? Shall we ban that word as well?

        You guys who are into banning words don’t seem to realize that there used it be book burnings by the Germans, because they felt what the books said was against their own beliefs. I rather not go down that route because someone is feeling sad about a word.

        If you ban retard, they will come up with another word. Don’t you realize that?

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you say it to someone with mental disabilities, yes. If you say it to your friend who’s about to do/just did some retarded shit, it’s not.