• Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Not too support Jill Stein but i often like things sarcastically. Not usually political statements, however.

      • SankaraStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        IMO, it should be two rounds. The first (the “primary” round) should be ranked choice voting to pick the top two and the second should be majority vote between these final two choices.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Not sure that it proves horseshoe theory so much as it proves that Jill Stein in particular is a gutless wretch and a puppet without principles, and that 3rd parties running for the presidency in the US are deeply unserious.

    • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The whole thing is money, all the way down. It’s only slightly different from rooting for your favorite sportsball stars until the electoral college (among other things) is brought into the modern age. The sooner these Cold War relics are out of office worldwide, the better our entire species’ chances get.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Russia is doing this to fringe parties all over Europe – it simply doesn’t matter to them whether they are left or right or whatever. So you get communist, leftist, fascist and populist parties all repeating Putin’s phrases. And in this case, the green party’s candidate.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I think if a third party were deeply serious about wanting to establish a viable political movement. They’d try building up at the local level first, the presidency should be one of the last steps of becoming “legitimate”, the unsexy local elections are where you build up support at being treated as a serious political movement. Instead, most current third party runs tend to feel like either spoiler campaigns and/or vanity campaigns, where I’m not even sure what good it would do them on the miraculous chance they happened to win the presidency, since third parties in general don’t have much presence in Congress. There’s like four “independent” members of Congress right now, good luck getting any of your third party platform initiatives done with likely no Congressional support.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s impossible for an environmental party to compete with the campaign money pumped into dem and rep campaigns by corporate & billionaire backers. Billionaires make sure that only big business friendly candidates have a chance. Green party candidates do run for lots of seats but their is no big money support for their cause and money runs politics.

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        My thoughts. When I run it will be as a independent or Ill start a party. But we will start by running for city council and mayor and small government positions.

        That how you build a movement Bernie Sanders said they only way to change the system is from the bottom up.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Jill who had dinner with Putin? SHOCKED I tell you!!! It seems like the ‘green’ party is just paid with greenbacks by putin’s government.

    • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Can you please explain to me how that “dinner with Putin” is important? I keep seeing people referencing it, I’ve seen the photo and read the articles. Also, if you search, there are other photos of putin with other politicians, should I assume they are all bought and paid for if I can find a picture of two people together?

      I’m more for factual information. This post of a reddit screen-shot by a poster who put up shitty information that’s irrelevant seems really popular, is this just like an internet fan-trolling on 3rd parties in the US that both the left and right love to perform? I don’t expect this to change if we even had a change in our electoral process, just more hating on other parties at this point.

  • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    The comment that was liked says to “vote her if not Trump”, it doesn’t say to vote “Trump if not her”.

    A very important nuance. A more charitable explanation is that she is trying to get undecided voters. Which is exactly what a presidential candidate is supposed to do.

    • I went through my saved threads recently and there were many things there I don’t remember seeing, never liked, and would not have had any interest in saving. Yet they ended up there because I fat finger things. Add the possibility of other social media persons having access to the account, liking it because she personally knew the person and didn’t really cared what it said, etc, it seems like a single media account like isn’t really that useful…

      Who knows how many comments and posts I’ve accidentally up voted or down voted without even realizing it…

    • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I agree both that there is a nuance in the difference strong enough to make the tweet in the post misleading/incorrect, and that Jill Stein is still nonetheless actively a bad-faith candidate who wishes for Trump to win

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      “vote her if not Trump”,

      Sounds like Stein puts up a clear either/or choice for people. In other words, if you aren’t voting for the weird orange felon, deprive Kamala Harris of a vote, and everyone knows Jill hasn’t a chance in hell of winning. It is not nuanced at all.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        A staffer probably went through and liked every post that said “vote green”

        You’re reading alot into 1 heart emoji on 1 comment

  • Ethalis@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    If that is supposed to be your ultimate proof that horseshoe theory is real, you might have some more convincing to do

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I wish it was, meaning ultimate as in “final”, so they won’t bring up that Enlightened Centrist bullshit again…

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m not a fan of Stein and definitely not of Trump, but this seems like a very circumstantial and flimsy thing to base that claim on.

    • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Indeed. She’s liking people talking about voting for her if they’re unsatisfied with their current party…the photo of her with Putin at the RT dinner has much worse optics I don’t think people need to deep dive into generic instagram likes.

  • graycube@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    This does seem like a stretch. We definitely need forces pulling the ruling party to the left to counteract forces pulling them to the right. With AOC and Bernie softening their tone, and most of the squad eradicated by AIPAC, the balance is off. I wish the Greens had come up with someone fresh instead of running Stein yet again.

  • CaptainKickass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Everyone defending Stein needs to ask themselves why I the world they would ask for votes for trump if you aren’t voting green.

    There’s only one answer and just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean it’s not true.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      A-fucking-men.

      They can say they’re voting green because the Democrats are too conservative for them, but if that’s their go-to excuse then I’d say it’s time to dump them now no? The party they support is just a lie to get conservatives in office.

      Funny how she only pops up during presidential elections and doesn’t seem to give two shits about the green party during literally any other election.

      • Naz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I voted for Jill once, and then she came out against vaccinations during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic and I realized she was an idiot.

        She’s as much green as she is dressed in green - just empty platitudes for people obsessed with the “sanctity of their body”.

        I’m still formally registered with both parties, but I get invited to vote in the Dem Primaries way more often

        We need actually competent third parties, just being on the fringe doesn’t make you competitive

    • Wilzax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Look I’m not the smartest person but I genuinely don’t know what the answer is. Can you tell me what page of the back of the book it’s on?

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        It’s on page 69420 huehuehue.

        The answer is: she’s either a puppet being paid to help conservatives win power by taking potential Democratic voters, or she genuinely wants to help conservatives win power by taking potential Democratic voters. There’s no reality where she’s progressive or “left” of anything short of fascism.

        When every goddamn election is down to like 13 people in some swing state then every vote matters. An exaggeration of course but not by much…

      • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        The answer is that Jill Stein is almost none of the things that people are accusing her to be in this thread. She didn’t tell anyone to vote for Trump over democrats. She isn’t Putin’s puppet or a Russian spy just because she had dinner at the same table as Putin once. She never was anti-vax (i think she said people should be allowed the freedom to choose for themselves). She isn’t a spoiler candidate and voting for her isn’t a vote for trump.

        All this shit is propaganda that’s worked very well on democrats in the US.

  • Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Jill Stein has some good ideas but her party needs to spend some quality time working on a very narrow set of counties/states they’re strongest in.

    I think there will be some appetite in the electorate for an anti-establishment, voter-reform, anti-corruption left party. The US sorely needs a nice set of representatives that bring forward fresh ideas and criticism to the parliament.

    The strategy for third parties should always be to get some seats and then hope for a hung parliament to get one or two policies adjusted and voter reform as a coalition agreement.

      • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t know any of her specific policy ideas, so I can’t comment on those, but I was under the impression that her main idea was the whole “we should all stop trashing the planet we all live on” thing, which is, generally speaking, a very good idea. I admit that doesn’t mean her plans to do something about it are any good.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I read her policy page. To the extent you might call some things good “ideas”, she generally doesn’t present an actual plan to get there, so they are just wishes rather than plans.

          But there are some plans, but they are generally flawed. One common thread is a declaration of doing something not within the authority of the presidency, declaring policies that are state level, legislature, or even foreign governments.

          Sometimes the concrete plans just logically don’t make fundamental sense. As an example, she simultaneously wants to disband the UN security council, but also have the UN security council hold Israel accountable, which is contradictory.

          She also just has flat out terrible ideas. Disband NATO, let Russia just win their invasion of Ukraine in the interest of “peace”.

          Then there are the ideas that sound good, but are too naive. Climate reparations to poor countries sound good, but history shows that approach ends poorly (inadvertently undermining local economy at best, to funding brutal warlords). Aid can’t just be a check, and it’s a tricky situation to navigate.

        • Caveman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Yeah, I heard some slogans at one point and I thought “That’s sounds pretty nice, let’s check her out”. I then watched a single interview with her and I was thoroughly disappointed. No plan, no knowledge about the problem, no idea about common solutions. Not even just answering with a politician segue into a prepared statement either, just a train wreck.

          I think the green party might go somewhere, just not under Jill Stein.

      • grozzle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        She is. It has always meant “when Russian tanks are coming, submit, don’t resist, of course the Russians are justified rolling their tanks into other countries.”

        Stein is happy for every town in Ukraine to end up like Bucha, Bakhmut, and Mariupol. She’s a tankie.