• Djtecha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What are you talking about? The first paragraph in is showing clear policy points to achieve objectives. Do you think you’ll get bill numbers or something here?

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t Bill nor Hillary’s number! I’ll take Bernie’s, though…

      “No you hang up. Nuh uh, you hang up this time. Okay, but before I hang up, tell me again about how I deserve dignity in life through healthcare?”

        • thefartographer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          @Djtecha@lemm.ee asked a snarky and well deserved question in response to RangerJosie’s either uninformed or specifically malicious comment. Rhetorically, they asked

          Do you think you’ll get bill numbers or something here?

          Intentionally, and for comedic effect, I pretended to misread this question to say “Do you think you’ll get Bill’s number or something here?”

          Since this is a political community, I decided to pretend that Djtecha was offering Bill Clinton’s phone number. I threw Hillary’s name in the mix to keep the theme political vs sexual since Bill is often an easy target on that front.

          Then, I used this joke to bridge the gap to include everyone’s favorite advocate, Bernie Sanders. Finally, I crafted a situational punchline to make it sound like I’m a smitten party on a phone call with Bernie Sanders, doing the classic teenager “no you hang up first.” Finally, instead of saying something like “fine, but sing me that song I love until I fall asleep,” I acted like I’d ask Bernie to explain single-payer healthcare and why everyone deserves it until I fall asleep.

          I hope I’ve clarified on my latest episode of my joke apparently wasn’t funny, and this explanation is surely making things worse. Y’all have a nice night!

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You can call out arguments, just don’t attack the user. This includes accusations of bots and state actors.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            What’s uncivil about insulting the product of a politician? Kamala Harris isn’t here.

            • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I didn’t suggest that it was uncivil. I suggested that it was trolling, likely coming out of the same Russia funded right wing propaganda network that that took and distributed more than $10 million of Russian money to harm the US of A. I suggested that it was anti-American propaganda gleefully and willfilly spread by those trying to bring about a Project 2025 Handmaid’s Tale christofascist dictatorship future for the United States. Of course there is nothing uncivil about that.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                shield
                M
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                See the civility rules in the sidebar. Accusing other users of being bots or state actors is a civility violation. Do not attack other users.