I know I know… “obligate carnivore”

    • Senal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Another indication you haven’t actually read any of the papers, even the titles

      3/5 of the papers are for both dogs and cats.

      I’m aware the title of the post you linked to was exclusivity about cats, the content of the majority of papers was not.

      No goalposts were moved i was responding to the information you posted, if you aren’t going to actually read them yourself your opinion on what constitutes goalposts means nothing.

      Other than the final line, nothing in my response even mentions dogs.

      However, lets say we only apply what i said to cats, every single point still stands.

      I’m assuming you don’t have any actual arguments or you would have mentioned them instead of picking up on a single word that doesn’t actually change the content of the response.

      Feel free to surprise me though.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just as an aside, I’ve noticed “moving the goalposts” is one of new favorite fallacies for people to slap around when they don’t know what they’re talking about.

        • Schmeckinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The funny thing is he moved the goalpost, but in the right direction. His argument was stricter on itself than required. It’s so funny when these people cry out fallacy, when in fact they are arguing using a fallacy.