I own Nights into Dreams and Christmas Nights and, frankly, I never understood the point of either of them.
I was a Sega kid in the Genesis generation. A friend of mine got a Saturn and I so desperately wanted to like Nights because it was the thing for Saturn. I didn’t like it at all. It felt hard to control, hard to understand, and was just not pleasant for me.
Meanwhile, a different friend and I had a blast trading off playing Mario 64. Hands down, way better for a 9 year old me.
At the time I was like “Sooo… you fly around in circles so you can fly around in circles and then fly around in circles? Not much of a ‘game’ there.”
So when Balan Wonderworld came out a few years ago “from the maker of Nights!” I was like “Yeah, hard pass.”
Crash Bandicoot.
Do people really think Nights is on the same caliber as Mario?
People have different tastes so to some people Nights is a better game.
I don’t want Mario and I don’t want 3D platformers. I don’t think Nights is a great game but I’ll give it 5 minutes at least.
Weird question. Mario 64 and it’s not even close. Most game devs agree that Mario 64 is a masterpiece. Bonus points for being on a platform that had just launched in a completely new paradigm.
What the fuck is Nights into Dreams?
For real tho
Sonic Team’s follow-up to the Sonic franchise. Released on the Sega Saturn, so despite it being one of the Saturn’s better-selling games, few people played it back when it was new. It has a decent cult following of fans and seems to be generally regarded as a good-but-not-spectacular game (like a solid 7-8 out of 10), but it’s nowhere near Mario 64’s caliber.
Seeing as this is the first time I’m hearing about Nights into Dreams, Mario is obviously better.
Super Mario 64 was more important to the gaming industry as a whole.
I’m going to say Mario 64 just because it was a really good game that I enjoyed back in 96 and I’ve never heard of Nights Into Dreams until this post right now lol
Same here, therefore Mario is by default a better game
I’d have to say its the one that I’ve heard about and played
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQnClqCSIfk
vintage bit
Super Mario 64.
Less experimental, solid controls, and on a system most people actually knew about. There’s a reason why the Saturn failed hard.
Less experimental? The N64 controller has 3 prongs (for our 2 hands) because they wanted a backup plan if the whole 3D gimmick never took off! Lol
“solid controls” - shakes fist at camera angles
Mario 64 not even close lol. What made you think Nights was nearly as popular?
The question wasn’t about popularity
Wow. What a question. Its hard for me not to be dismissive.
I’m going to have to go with Mario 64 by a country mile.
Appreciate the thought experiment though.
for me, NiGHTS 100%. SM64 is good but was definitely feeling the growing pains of 3D gameplay, whereas NiGHTS was the cumulation of all of the 2D gaming that came before it while also utilizing the new technology available to it’s fullest. as an arcade score-attack style game it also has near infinife replayability, and the soundtrack is one of if not the best of all time. i guess it’s kind of apples to oranges, though- farer to compare two arcade style games like NiGHTS and Star Fox 64 or two 3D platformers like Super Mario 64 and Burning Rangers
suprised to see how many commenters here haven’t even heard of NiGHTS. a remake of the original game is dirt cheap on Steam and definitely worth taking for a whirl. it is a truly amazing game
Take it from me, I own the remake myself!
a remake of the original game is dirt cheap on Steam
Came with a special controller also, the NiGHTS controller was my controller of choice from that point on with the Saturn. I didn’t get the Christmas NiGHTS gold edition tho, which I consider a personal failure.
