• Media Sensationalism@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I passed on a lot of the fancier apartment buildings for requiring an app and a cell phone to gain access to your own home. I shouldn’t have to agree to an arbitration/class action waiver to use my own front door, I don’t feel comfortable with management getting a notification on their phone every time I come or go, I don’t like the fact that 20+ listed partner companies have access to sensitive personal data, and I shouldn’t have to wait for maintenance to show up in the middle of the night because I couldn’t make it back home before my personal tracking device died on me.

    The sad thing is that most of these locking units cost these apartments hundreds of dollars each on top of a monthly subscription.

      • Media Sensationalism@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        U.S… Not an actual tracking device, just a cell phone. I usually leave it at home, which would have been impossible to do at many of those buildings.

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      management getting a notification

      Isn’t that a giant privacy violation? Why does anyone need to know when you come or go?

      • Media Sensationalism@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        “…to maintain the safety and security of the building and everyone in it.” - An actual FAQ

        Way to make home feel like a prison.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Cost or no cost, IoT should not be able to brick devices on the whim - or unexpected dissolution - of a faceless corporation.

    Unfortunately too many people are trusting of monolithic entities which promise the moon and then decide what they really meant was “bend over”.

    I may be channelling a bit of Louis Rossman here.

    That said, the other comments here suggest that the device in question still has all features when accessed from the front panel, which is a step up from a lot of other IoT behaviour. Owners who don’t want to pay for the app should still disconnect it from any connectivity and keep it that way just in case the manufacturer decides to remove that functionality as well.

    And if it stops working altogether without network connectivity, take the L and maybe mail it back to the company’s head office with no return address. Let them deal with the e-waste.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It is utterly bullshit. But is the app required for using the device?

    Also

    The subscription fee will only apply to people who make an account after August 21. Those who downloaded the app and made an account before August 21 won’t have to pay. But everyone will have to make an account; some people have been using the app without one until now

      • subtext@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except, prior to this announcement, there was apparently another statement from Anova that you can’t control the first gen ones.

        the announcement follows an Anova statement saying it will no longer let users remotely control their kitchen gadgets via Bluetooth starting on September 28, 2025.

      • Prox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Unless these people paid a premium for this kind of “smart” device vs. the cost of a basic version.

        • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think the bigger issue is that they’re bricking all support for the oldest models, trying to force customers to abandon a fully functional device just because they want more money.

          The app subscription fee is obnoxious as all get out, but punishing your oldest customers for your profit margins is what’s a bit infuriating.

          At least, imo.

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Honestly, after a decade of keeping compatibility and stuff, and that the sous vide still works fine without the apk, I don’t really see this as much of a big deal. An apk for a sous vide is nearly useless, anyhow. What are you going to do with it?

            • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s more about the principle. Why is it ok for a manufacturer to remotely disable a feature that was bought & paid for by a decades worth of customers?

              Now that they’ve done it once, what’s stopping future attempts to gin up higher profits using the same tactics?

              I don’t think anyone here is angry enough to go all Kid Rock on their Sous Vides, but I do think there are plenty who will look at a different brand when it is time for a replacement.

              • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Well they’re on v3 now and this ends the version 1, so I doubt they’ve sold the v1 for the past 5 years or so, but again, it’s not an apk that you need to use it. If it were a device like a garage door opener that let’s you open/close or see when the door is opened or closed I’d be bitching up a storm. Same if it were like a door deadbolt to lock/unlock your front door. But a water cooker? What do you need the apk for? It couldn’t functionally do anything over bluetooth to be of any help.

                • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Would you buy a refrigerator from a manufacturer that wanted to make the ice maker a subscription service out of nowhere?

                  I get that the app isn’t a requirement for the device, but neither is an ice maker required for a refrigerator to function as designed.

                  They’re both features advertised as part of the original purchase price. Why does one get an expiration date out of the blue?

                  The people who are likely to be losing Bluetooth functionality are also the most likely to be from the original kickstarter batch.

                  Even if some-many of them have already upgraded to a newer model, that’s still one hell of a statement to make to your original backers.

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You can set the temperature and the cook time on the device without having the app at all. The biggest benefit of the app is that you get a notice when the water is to temperature, which for certain more sensitive foods is needed to put the food in. (If you’re doing a 24 hour slow cook, it’s not really needed, but if you’re trying to do something with more precise cooking lengths, you don’t want the variance of starting water temp affecting how long the food is in the bath.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Friendly reminder for others that you can setup this quite easily with home assistant and conditional notification alerts. I do it with my govee. Open. Source. Everything.

            • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I looked into that and you need to build a Bluetooth bridge out of a ESP32. Pretty easy once you have the dev platform set up, but not for your average Joe.

              There is an anova integration, but depends on their cloud service. When they stop supporting old devices, they will no longer function.

              That’s what I understand anyway.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have never bought an appliance or physical product that requires an app to use, and I never will until our society has deteriorated to the the point where there is no alternative to that in order to get by in it. It’s almost at that point already with smartphones but for now it’s still possible to get by without one.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Be evil so they have to stomp us out” shouldn’t be a standard. Stop allowing a world that rewards villains. Stop being a villain.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Coulda woulda shoulda…

        People either accept the reality and act on it or keep getting fucked over because the world “shouldn’t work like this”

        • Smoogs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Speak for yourself, snowflake. The world isn’t a safe place for shitheads to be shitheads. Culpability doesn’t make you a victim.

  • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Translation:

    “Fuck you for not replacing your perfectly fine and still working 10 year old machine and making our line go up more. We’re gonna do our best to brick it because we want all of your money.”

    Fuck capitalism. I will (and have been) doing my absolute to avoid buying any kind of physical device that requires an app to function

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, I need to start being better about this. It’s a shame because I bought my joule sous vide because I like the simplicity and ability to monitor and program it remotely (helpful when cooking for 5-6h). App stopped working properly and now they’ve been purchased by breville and if I want to use it I need to switch and I’m guessing it won’t be long before they start to drop functionallity or require some sort of subscription. There are things like this where the app is much more than a gimmick. But it sucks to have some company pulling the strings of what you can or can’t do with your own hardware.

    • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      if I see something requires an app, no matter how good it is otherwise. the product is dead to me. I know it is, effectively, going to break within a year or two.

        • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          you never know for sure until you try though, so if it requires an app, it’s dead to me and I don’t trust anything else the company makes.

          if it has an API i get very wet very fast.

          • kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s fair, but the point I was trying to make was that I have tried and, for the one I’ve got at least, the app isn’t required. I’m not trying to defend them or anything, I just thought it was worth mentioning.

            Tbh I’m kinda glad it doesn’t have an API, because I’d end up wasting a lot of time playing with it haha.

          • linearchaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            About two phone changes ago I never reinstalled the anova app.

            It’s like pressing the buttons on top of the cooker with extra steps.

            • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              yeah there are apps I want on my phone, but if anything says ‘there is an app’ I’m instantly averse.

              even the things I do want phone apps for, I have to browse on fdroid because default options are all terrible. basic shit like file browsers and media players in commercial OS’s are just, like, vile and do not function. even if I didn’t care about the endoscopes they try to snake up every orifice, they are deliberately nonfunctional.

      • TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m getting that same way.

        Currently trying to chase down some automatic sun shades that don’t need an app to do time-based cycles. Shouldn’t be this hard, but every band wants you to use absolute garbage apps.

    • __init__@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I will (and have been) doing my absolute to avoid buying any kind of physical device that requires an app to function

      Same. It’s becoming more difficult every day.

      • FMEEE@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        And that’s so sad. There are a lot of (mainly Elderly people) who don’t even have a smartphone who now often can’t use the most basic stuff necessary because it needs an app.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          A lot of this stuff is only useful if you have money, anyway. And poverty rates among the elderly have been climbing since the Housing Crash of '08

          • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I’ve said this before, I’m going to say it again: people with money spend it to save time.

            Managing 2FA, software updates, account signin, device pairing, billing, privacy policy updates, cookie notices… This shit does not save people time. It does the complete opposite.

            These products are not built for consumers. These products are purely anticompetitive schemes, propping up crappy business models, trying to cash in on the data harvesting gold rush.

            • experbia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              These products are not built for consumers.

              they’re often built for investors. they are feasible enough products that some people will even buy them, so you get investors. then, the thing is always just “one more issue we need to fix” away from “mass adoption”, “for real this time”… to keep milking the investors as long as possible.

            • primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’ve been screaming this at the top of my lungs for 20 years, and oh my god the “I told you so”'s I get to say now feel SO good.

              i mean, I don’t have any friends anymore, so mostly im just calling up people who hate me now and saying “I told you so”, but, like I DID, so, worth.

              I mean, not, like, ‘worth’ in the sense that anything in my life works or wasn’t torn apart by my adherence to materialism and avoidance of dark patterns, but, like, you know, feels good for a few minutes when they haven’t changed their number.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean it is shitty still, but people with an old device and an account already are unaffected, plus the old devices like the one I have is completely operable offline. I’ve not connected it to WiFi except when I first got it to check the app out.

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    First Inwas like Yeeeah to all the “smart stuff”. But more and more I’m thinking - what happens to current cars after some time? When all the connected crap gets disconnected? Currently you can fix and drive any old piece of junk and drive it in theory forever. What happens when the smart cars lose connection to mothership? What happens when all the electronics go bad and there is no way to fix it? Same goes for your fridge, coffee maker, etc.

  • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I bet the app requires cloud hosting for it to run, and its starting to eat away at the profits they made.

    If it needs nothing but bluetooth, then this a pure money grab.

    • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It use to operate only off of Bluetooth, & then they added single band WiFi. They just added dual band WiFi as a new feature & are now removing Bluetooth functionality completely.

      Absolutely a cash grab.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Usually, if it needs cloud hosting, it’s because they’re collecting your data. That presumably is a revenue stream for them.

      I have one of these, and I haven’t touched the app. Works perfectly fine without it.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You know, This kind of shit happens so frequently anymore that if you’re dumb enough to buy things that, for absolutely no reason, requires an internet connection and/or an app… Then you deserve what you get.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s sometimes hard to find, I needed a new stove, all the ones I could afford and that had what we needed had a fucking internet connection. I fucking hate it.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m not being sarcastic or attacking or anything, but I find that hard to believe. I spent 2 minutes before posting this looking at ranges and ovens (I dont know if you’re talking about a complete stove unit (burners on top of an oven in a self contained stand alone package) or the oven unit that mounts into a wall, so I looked at both in that time) and I found tons that were cheap (well, cheap as far as these devices ago at least) and none of them had smart connectivity.

        It wasnt until I was getting into the high cost items that were $5000+ that smart stuff started appearing.

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I wish! The entire range is what we needed, had to be propane compatible, it was around 1k, at home depot. I genuinely try to avoid IoT bull shit.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Almost all ranges are propane compatible but will require the effort of installing the (included) propane conversion kit. The exception is Frigidaire, where the kit has to be purchased separately.

            FYI, most of Whirlpool’s range lineup (including Amana, Maytag and the non-“Pro” KitchenAid models), all of Frigidaire’s range lineup, most of GE’s base line range lineup (not Profile or Café) do not have Wi-Fi capability. It’s mostly Samsung and LG pathologically putting connectivity into everything they make.

            What features did you need that you couldn’t avoid connectivity? I just queried my own product database and came up with 202 models that are LP compatible without purchase of a kit and do not have Wi-Fi capability. 261 if you’re willing to countenance Frigidaire. And even among most of those that do have connectivity (KitchenAid’s “Pro” models being an irritating exception) you don’t need to connect to Wi-Fi or use the app for any functionality of the appliance; it’s just an extra.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Find a scratch and dent place near you. Thats pretty much where I get all my appliances. Often the cosmetic issues are not even noticable, and if they are, they are often in a place that you wont see since they’ll be hidden by cabinets or what have you.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes let’s make this the consumers’ fault, what with their limitless power in this dystopian fuckscape

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        “Its not my fault that I bought for $$$Texas more than a normal product and created the market for it, its their fault for making it available for me to choose to buy!”

        • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Gross oversimplification of a complex issue by a corpo bootlicker? Color me shocked…

          They control the market, idiot. As well as the regulatory mechanisms for it.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Yes, because a corpo bootlicker is gonna tell you to stop buying their overpriced crap and creating a market for it

            Cause corpo bootlickers are notorious for wanting to harm the companies that do stupid and/or bad

            Fucking galaxy brain over here, thinking hes a genius cause hes a literal parrot repeating tidbits of what other people said without any consideration for thought or context.

            You can’t keep throwing money at these awful companies, buying these awful products, and expect them to fucking stop. at some point you’re gonna have to fucking admit you’re gonna have to make a sacrifice and actually fucking speak with your wallet.

  • ben@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’re just going to push people to the cheaper units at this point.

    I was looking at sous vide cookers a few months back and was considering ANOVA but they were too expensive. Opted for a generic one instead.

    The fact that they’re more expensive and require a subscription for what’s essentially a set of presets that my cheap unit has for free is just ridiculous.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Interesting, because when they were relatively new, they were also the cheap option. Sous vide used to be a $1000+ thing. I did a DIY version for around $200, but later Anova came out and it was less sketchy than my box of wires running mains voltage.

      Instant Pot seems to make a pretty good one that fits around the sides of their pressure cookers.

      Anova’s app is basically useless. Could be nice for looking up temperatures and times for specific things, but I usually google it, anyway. Steaks are by far the most common thing I do sous vide, so it’s usually preset for that. Never used the app outside of playing with it when I first got it.

      One thing is for sure: I won’t be recommending Anova to friends anymore.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh, that’s just the sealed bag like normal. Back then, I was using special ziploc bags with a port for a small hand pump. They seem to have stopped making those, and I switched to a regular vacuum sealer.

          The diy part was the heater/pump. I based it on this:

          https://makezine.com/projects/sous-vide-immersion-cooker/

          The problem with this design is that because it sits above the hot water, it tends to have a lot of condensation build up inside the housing. So I rebuilt it to have power plugs for the teacup heaters and pump. Then it could be set to the side, and I could use more heaters for larger containers.

      • Gordito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Instan pot didn’t continue to update their app three years ago and I now have a useless Insta pot.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t think I ever touched an app for my Insta Pot or its sous vide attachment, but maybe the newer ones have to?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Could be nice for looking up temperatures and times for specific things, but I usually google it

        Well… who knows how long until we start getting billed for that, too.

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I refuse to use one that requires bluetooth or an account. I want to turn the bitch on and go do shit for 4+hr. There’s nothing fancy about the process. Some real Ron Popeil shit and they try to force apps on us.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Does it require?

        This summer I spent way too much money on a grill with an app. The thing is it’s a smoker so i might run it all day and the app lets me check on it while still doing other stuff all that time.

        However the app is an extra, and I would still have all functionality besides removing if the app went away. I’d be pissed losing remote functionality after spending so much money, but I’d still be able to use the grill normally

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don’t know whether to upvote you for a solid reply, or downvote the lack of functionality without an app

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I own one of these, and I honestly forgot there was an app. There’s literally no reason for it, outside of the timed-start mode that I never use.

    Honestly, the biggest mistake was making this an IoT device to begin with.