• Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The pandemic showed us we need to revamp our unemployment safety net and this includes doing away with tipping.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    My guy says that not taxing “tips” is only going to embolden companies looking to move line item payouts, and force more people to work for minimum wage.

    You’ll see a massive wave of previously non-tip jobs turn into tipped jobs, which only benefits the employer.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah. Raise the fucking federal minimum wage. Mandate that it keep pace with inflation.

  • JoShmoe@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly the more rules they make the worse it gets. We can’t have a air quality protection without it turning into a gold rush for collecting and selling breathable air.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fuck tips. If you work, you should be getting a living wage, not hoping you score a $100 tip to scrape through the month. Tips are a wage subsidy for corporations.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yup. This is slapping on a bandaid for a very select few. The real problem is wages and cost of living.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is as little as possible, and it will be used in lieu of an actual minimum wage increase. Democrats will coast on it for as long as they can before they do as little as possible again in another 15 years.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          B b but Dems bad! That didn’t take long from you.

          If you want them to do more, then you have to vote and give them consistent victories in all 3 houses.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            If Democrats want me to say good shit about their complete lack of effort towards raising wages, they can raise wages. Until then, I’m going to gripe about it.

            Government workers and blue states got theirs, so it’s no longer a problem as far as Democrats are concerned.

            • someguy3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              If you want then to be more progressive, then they need to win elections first. When they lose, they go to the center to find voters. They’ve had all 3 houses (presidency, house of reps and Senate) for 4 years of the last 24 years. 6 years of the last 32 years. 6 years of the last 44 fucking years. They are on an epic losing streak because the left never shows up to vote. And you wonder why they go to the center to find voters?

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Just support them for a few more decades no matter how many times they betray you, and they’ll totally do what you want.

                Inflation outpaces incrementalism. It’s why Democrats are so enamored with it.

                Sinema’s thumbs down defines the party until they do better.

                I still vote for the shitty anti-worker party over the shittier more anti-worker party, but since I gripe, you have to pretend I’m not voting so you can lecture me for not being as delighted as you are that the party won’t fix shit.

                • someguy3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Few more decades? You’re talking as if they’ve had control. They have not. I already told you they’ve been on an epic losing streak because the left never shows up. They’ve had control of all 3 for 6 years of the last 44 years. 6 measly years, out of the last 44 fucking years. That means they have to reach across the aisle for 38 years of the last 44 fucking years. Can’t handle this huh? So you have to pretend … whatever that stuff above was.

                  And you wonder why progress is slow?

                  Who said I’m pretending you don’t vote? I’m using the term you in broad sense.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you’re not able to pay your employees a living wage, your company does not have a viable business model and you need to either change it to a viable model or shut down the business.

  • Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ll take a bad policy to win a swing state and make sure we don’t lose that Senate seat.

  • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Here’s my vision:

    1. Raise minimum wage. We want food and housing. This shit shouldn’t be impossible to get
    2. Implement universal basic income. Again. WE WANT FOOD AND HOUSING, JESUS CHRIST
    3. Implement a wealth tax. Great hordes of wealth being untaxed while income is just reinforces generational poverty
    4. Eliminate income tax now that wealth tax is covering everything. It disproportionately punishes workers versus the ultra-wealthy who don’t get paid in money. Meanwhile, who’s getting taxed is just not using the money they got taxed to pay for… And say it with me, kids, food and housing
    • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The first three are great, the fourth idea is insane. Why shouldn’t people pay into their government? If you’re poor, like the first $25k, fine let that be tax free, but why not keep the money in the government coffers and provide single payer healthcare, free college tuition, student debt forgiveness, municipal broadband? Our taxes are not high compared to other western nations.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not saying don’t tax me. I’m saying don’t tax me based on income. Tax me based on accumulated worth. Its possible to be highly paid but to have started in such a back foot that you’re still in the hole. Meanwhile folks like that are paying more into society than anyone else through sales tax because they need to do things like furnish homes they bought

        • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          But if you tax based on wealth, doesn’t that make home ownership less possible? Property taxes aren’t going away, but now a wealth tax is going to hit property owners? Sales tax is extremely regressive. Income tax is one of the few ways to do progressive taxing.

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It means you’ll start paying a little more tax as value acculates in your property holding. The goal is, yes, long term property holders will pay more tax the longer they hold the land. More importantly, it’ll hit landlords super hard and first time home buyers barely even a little. The goal is to tax people based on their ability to pay, and to avoid creating permanent classes where all the value created by the workers goes up the chain to the wealthy.

            • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              All you would end up doing is creating a new business for accountants to devalue someone’s holdings. I assume that you are saying that the wealth will be the value of the asset less any loan against the property, because that’s the only way a first-time home buyer would be taxed nearly nothing. Why wouldn’t the wealthy simply take loans against their assets thereby devaluing them for the purposes of a wealth calculation? The same way that they borrow against their stock portfolio.

      • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        All wealth is created by workers… Any wealth used for the good of all society is coming from the workers same as all profit does. No need to add the middleman… Just charge it all to the corporations… First our work pays for society, only what’s left over after should be considered profit

    • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Eliminate all taxes on individuals, charge the whole bill for a functioning society to the corporations (preferably at the same ratio as the corporations make profit, ie if a company makes 10% of all the profit that quarter they pay 10% of the bill)… We the people democratically decide what all is included in a functioning society

  • MedicsOfAnarchy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m inclined towards a universal sales tax, and elimination of income tax. That cuts out loopholes for billionaires who run around buying property, buildings, and yachts - a 10 or 12% tax would fix that (of course, every solution provides its own set of problems) The other solution is having my employer “tip” me every two weeks.

    • obre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Income tax can be set up as a progressive taxation system, but sales tax, even with an added luxury tax is inherently regressive because poor people spend more of their money as a proportion of their income.

  • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Not a tipped worker here: are tips currently calculated as part of SS earned income? How will exempting tips from taxes affect future benefits for these workers?

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tips are just added to what you made so yeah, it counts wherever an hourly wage counts.

      However the current system just gets people not to report tips, so realistically they’re paying a lot less into SS anyway. It’s basically just the government going “alright let’s make that official instead of tax fraud”

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    this may make harder for tipped workers to access credit, since they can claim they made way more tips than they actually did since is tax free, forcing banks to exclude tips as proof of income for mortgage applications and such

    • Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Probably one of the most overlooked issues, but it’s not like we’re going to be buying houses in the future, we’ll just rent them from corporations

            • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Ah, well that’s where the tip lives. It’s the tip’s jar /s

              I once had a coworker labeling prepped food containers, and we only realized at the end that this was not the assignment for him. We had chikun, leming slices, tumaters, and it was kind of a mess. His native language was English, but not everyone’s was, and his phonetic interpretations were different for the rest of us to understand. Not his fault, but neat handwriting doesn’t automatically make you the best one to write

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Devils advocate here. How do you incentivize doing a good job as a waitstaff without increasing costs without tips? If your pay is x and no tips, what else is there other than do a good job or else I’ll fire you?

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        A 10 cent raise? There are servers that make several hundred dollars a week due to tips and you want them to give that up for a yearly 10 cent raise? Good luck convincing anyone to give that up.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      How do you incentivize doing a good job

      By paying them, same as any other job. Should every other job be 2.13 plus tips because your infernal client feels like obstreperous karens should decide if a person deserves food and shelter based on how thorough a job they do of kissing ass?

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You are being disingenuous by suggesting all service is equal. There is a difference between exceptional customer service and mediocre. Don’t you think servers should be able to be rewarded for going above and beyond?

        Obviously the business needs to pay a fair wage but tipping in the service industry allows exceptional service to be rewarded.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Don’t you think servers should be able to be rewarded for going above and beyond?

          Sure. Here. have a Jack Chick Tract. 2.13 is obscene and you know it.

          • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I never once said that it is ok to pay servers below minimum wage because they make it up in tips. Using that as your argument for why we shouldn’t tip is a straw man fallacy.

            If a place is offering below minimum wage to work for tips, who’s fault is it for working there? I understand that people are many times not in a position to negotiate pay, especially when it’s an industry standard but at some point workers have to stand up for themselves. There is a huge movement here in the US with millennials and gen x refusing to work for poor pay. That is the only way to change the industry.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I never once said that it is ok to pay servers below minimum wage because they make it up in tips

              2.13 is the minimum wage for tipped workers.

              And now you’re blaming the exploited for their exploitation.

              Why even have a minimum wage when the people with no power at all can just choose not to be exploited and starve?