• ABCDE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    57 people show that you did. It’s about hypocrisy, and your ignorance of this only shows how silly and disingenuous you are.

    • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      57 people show that you did.

      I don’t know what that means or what the context is. 57 people show that I did what? I don’t understand.

      and your ignorance of this only shows how silly and disingenuous you are.

      I can be pretty ignorant. And silly. But I’m not being disingenuous.

      Dude, just because I don’t vote for the same person as you do, doesn’t make me “disingenuous.”

      Please remember the civility rule of this sub.

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I do not vote in the US as I’m not from there.

        I’m not being uncivil and do not need reminders from you.

        The topic is about hypocrisy. You ignoring this is being disingenuous, deliberately ignoring the point of this article and why people have heavily down voted you.

        • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The topic is about hypocrisy. You ignoring this is being disingenuous, deliberately ignoring the point of this article and why people have heavily down voted you.

          I have addressed this though. Go back and read my posts. It IS about hypocrisy. And my point was that pointing out the hypocrisy is fine, but making fun and/or shaming because the person was a hypocrite was not.

          My original post was actually pointing out the hypocrisy of many of the comments here. I even had one saying that “making fun of him wearing a dress is ok because it’s satire.” That’s hypocrisy.

          Pointing it out is fine. But in my view making fun of him is NOT fine and stoops down to the republican’s level.

          And also, if you read my comments and their replies, some people actually agreed with me.

          I don’t care about downvotes. It’s the interwebs. This means nothing to me. Plus I am not even voting for the republican or the democratic party. I support and vote for the Green Party.

          So no, I wasn’t being disingenuous.

          And let me get this straight: it’s ok for you to call me “disingenuous,” “ignorant,” and “silly,” but I remind you of civility and you feel the need to point out that I don’t have to remind you.

          Really? Think about that. I haven’t called you or any of the people saying harsh things about me, any names. But I have been called plenty of names.

          I’m voting Green Party so in the scheme of things, I don’t care that much. I mean, I’ll defend myself, but I’m not as obsessed or emotionally attached to the subject as many in this thread seem to be.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            “ignorant,”

            I just checked this, and I did not say that, I said “your ignorance”. If you’re going to (try and) quote me, do it properly instead of lying.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m not as obsessed or emotionally attached to the subject as many in this thread seem to be.

            Yet you posted an essay and still missed the point.

            Disingenuous is an adjective, and accurate to how I perceive you. I haven’t used crude language despite your assertions.

            • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yet you posted an essay and still missed the point.

              Oh sorry. so a few paragraphs is an essay where you are at? Please tell me what school considers than an essay. Because, friend, my school required WAY more text to be an essay.

              30 seconds of reading is hardly an essay.

              Disingenuous is an adjective, and accurate to how I perceive you.

              And I disagree. And please be mindful of civility.

              • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Indeed, essays do, I was being hyperbolic to highlight how much you wrote yet still managed to completely miss the point. I guess hyperbole was missed at your school, eh?

                You suggested that you are too above and beyond the subject by saying others are “obsessed” and “emotionally attached”. Interesting that you are now embodying hypocrisy yourself. Which words are civil and uncivil, if you’d care to make a list?

                Okay: obsessed, emotionally attached

                Not okay: disingenuous

                Please be mindful of civility.

                • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Sorry if what I wrote seemed to be too many words for you. I mean, it takes 30 seconds to read. Was it really that much of a problem? come on, now…

                • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  There is no “L”. And I’m happy to move on. And I’m still voting for Green Party. No one in this thread has changed my mind. And that’s ok.

                  So yes, let’s move on.