Doesn’t CrowdStrike have more important things to do right now than try to take down a parody site?
That’s what IT consultant David Senk wondered when CrowdStrike sent a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notice targeting his parody site ClownStrike.
Senk created ClownStrike in the aftermath of the largest IT outage the world has ever seen—which CrowdStrike blamed on a buggy security update that shut down systems and incited prolonged chaos in airports, hospitals, and businesses worldwide…
https://clownstrike.lol/crowdmad/
This line:
P.S. Don’t your lawyers have more important shit to be doing right now anyway?
Yeah but then it would not be a clownstrike…
!!<cme a lde a 1. Device information
Sync version: v24.03.26-14:56 Sync flavor: googlePlay Ultra user: false **Device information** Sync version: v24.03.26-14:56 Sync flavor: googlePlay Ultra user: false View type: Slides q Push enabled: false Device: r0q Model: samsung SM-S901Uable Android: 14
x View type: Slides Device information
Sync version: v24.03.26-14:56 Sync flavor: googlePlay Ultra user: false View type: Slides Push enabled: false Device: r0q Model: samsung SM-S901U Android: 14[BUG] Sample title
Sample description Sample description body
Scenario (steps to reproduce)**
- Do something
- Do something else
Result(s) Sample results
Device information
Sync version: v24.03.26-14:56 Sync flavor: googlePlay T View type: Slides Push enabled: false Device: r0q > Model: samsung SM-S901U Android: 14 hePush enabled: false > Device: r0q Model: samsung SM-S901U Android: > > 1jii4Es a espera
You may have posted this to the wrong thread :)
Lmao what a legend. How would DMCA even apply in this case though? Parodies are free speech
They don’t. Companies regularly abuse DMCA notices because the law REQUIRES a hosting company to take down the information immediately.
It allows 14 days for the same information to be restored after receiving a counter notice.
I think if DMCAs are abused, it should limit the company’s ability to file one in the future.
and if not… regular people could do the same
Laws only apply to poor people. If you submit a bogus DMCA that takes down a corporation’s site, they will sue you so hard your children’s children will be paying off the debt.
It’s all by design. The level of damage is measured by capital, and not by how illegitimate, anti-competitive, immoral, or criminal the actions are.
It should require jail time if abused.
I don’t see anything on that site that infringes the DMCA. At best they might have a trademark violation claim, but DMCA is only for copyright claims, not trademark claims.
The only real use of trademark I could find was actually on the twitter account clownstrike took a picture of, unless they seriously want to try and tell is they think the name could be confused for theirs with a straight face.
I love this
I am kinda PO’ed I didn’t come up with this on my own lol
I support the right of clowns to strike for whatever reason
They’ve gotta do something in the face of ballooning expenses…
Well everyone nose about inflation, but what about a clown’s right to shoes?
Shoes? They could use a bigger car first. Have you seen how many people they have to cram in there?
Bigger cars!? Have you seen the price of pies in this economy?
Buddy, I don’t want to hear about clowns and their creampies, or whatever it is you’re watching online.
Whatever they’re watching, it’s fucking funny.
You guys are awesome
Helium prices are TOO DAMN HIGH
Senk received a DMCA notice from Cloudflare’s trust and safety team, which was then hosting the parody site.
Cloudflare sent themselves a DMCA takedown notice, instead of just taking down the content from their own web hosting for violating their policies. Weird.
DMCA takedown notices are not preemptively judged on their merits before filing. Anyone can file a frivolous takedown notice, just as anyone can file a frivolous lawsuit.
Yes parody is protected speech under fair use. Yes, companies are required to account for fair use before filing takedown notices. These things would come up if the case goes to trial which is unlikely.
Cloudflare and Crowdstrike are different companies.
ooooooopppppps someday I will learn to read
way to go, dorks. now i’ve heard of this site that i would have never heard of if you hadn’t streissanded it. and i for one approve
Maybe laylow and STFU crowdstrike? You know what never mind, pour fuel on the fire burning below you - go out screaming you turds.
told Ars that he has no plans to move ClownStrike back to Cloudflare’s hosting service. Instead, he responded by suggesting that Cloudflare update its abuse-reporting system to confirm receipt of counter notices, build a web portal where users can track abuse reports,
Good suggestions
and perhaps most significantly, revoke CSC’s ability to submit abuse reports as a penalty for sending a bogus takedown
Pretty sure they can’t. DMCA has strict rules that providers must follow to avoid liability.
Imagine believing that large enough companies would be so heinous as to follow the law. What villains they’d be!
/s
Only when it benefits them*
Sounds like they could use some more sites linking to them to improve SEO. https://clownstrike.lol/
this is so tame lmao
It’s blocked on my work computer, saying it’s a malware website
Accessible through my corporate network. Fun thing, that.
"The category of https://clownstrike.lol/ is Phishing
This site has been reviewed recently. We are not accepting category change requests at this time."
Fortinet filter lmao
ill manually whitelist them on my fleet rofl
This. This is why we invented the internet. Well this and porn.
Full Streisand effect.
That was a good read with him documenting and sharing everything.
Apparently, Cloudflare never received either of Senk’s counter notices, which is a problem since Cloudflare only allows a 72-hour window to contest a takedown notice.
This sounds like ClownFlare outright lying through its teeth. Probably not even to defend ClownStrike, but to not look incompetent.
I think it’s time to expand the Clown-Empire and add ClownSocialServices.lol and ClownFlare to its Vassals.
What do we call the head of state? The Witish Clown?The POTCS (President of The Circus States)? The Top Wig?
The Streisand effect is an unintended consequence of attempts to hide, remove, or censor information, where the effort instead increases public awareness of the information.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effectYez 🤡
Someone is racing Elon in an “any % speed run to completely destroy an established companies credibility.”
Elom should buy CrowdStrike, rename it clownstrike, send the DMCA, and then run it into the ground like Twitter.
Yes and no here. Businesses by and large won’t stop using them because of this. And if they succeed, it’s a deterrent for others.
We must agree that :
1-they did want to sensor information
2-but the information was made more public.
Now, are you saying that (1) was indeed their intention but also that (2) was intentional. That being quite rich, they will continue to send DMCAs to intimidate anyone. Finally, their main goal wouldn’t only be to deter this one action but also similar actions by others, which would be more effective if the DMCA succeeds.
… i must agree with you here if this is what you meant.
My name is Nathan Fielder, And I graduated from one of Canada’s top business schools with really good grades.
The plan: turn this website into the world’s first parody cybersecurity platform
We will call it… Dumb Crowdstrike.
Crowdstrike IS the parody of what Crowdstrike purported itself to be.
Using the DMCA as a censorship tool needs to be a criminal offense subject to jail time.
Agreed 100%, it’s tactics similar to slapp lawsuits, and either shouldn’t be allowed and require jail time when abused
Why that’s literally what it was designed to do
DMCA was designed to prevent intellectual property infringement, not as a censorship tool.
Yes that’s exactly what the person you replied to was saying.
DMCA was built to save IP, however it’s routinely abused and used for censorship. And not a single thing is done to the abusers so they continue with their nonsense.
No they literally said that DMCA was designed for censorship…
Copyright assholes got a seat at the table when it was being drafted everyone else was given the finger. Its designed to be easily abused. Accidently on purpose, if you get me.
It is, but this isn’t. The DMCA doesn’t mention Trademark. That’s a separate section of law because copyright and trademark are different things.
Crowdstrike submitting a DMCA takedown for alleged Trademark infringement isn’t how it’s supposed to work at all. Likely because they know this isn’t actually a Trademark infringement case.
Cloudflare’s automated system not being smart enough to see that is fine. Their abuse/counterclaim process being broken isn’t. ( Not that that’s new or unique )
The ClownStrike person didn’t attempt to use Cloudflare’s counterclaim system.
Cloudflare’s counterclaim system didn’t open a ticket when the notification email was replied to.
That’s the kind of nonsense you expect from a local municipality hosting solution. Not one of the biggest on the Internet.
they should update their homepage to a forced download of an empty index.html
