• Scallionsandeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Between the response to this ticket and the big antitrust win today, this is the most optimistic I’ve been about the direction of American politics in a very long time.

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    After feeling absolutely hopeless with the democratic direction for basically 3 years, I had put out of my mind the liklihood that they would pick Walz.

    As a MN resident I floated him like 4 months ago as a Biden replacement over shitlibs like Newsome, but I honestly didn’t expect leadership to consider him for anything other than his current position

    I’ll be sad to see him go but I’m much less nihilistic about the general now, so I’ll take it.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    As much as I would have liked to see her make a strategic pick who could help her win an at risk state like Arizona or Pennsylvania, he has less baggage than Shapiro.

    I think too, there’s strategy in a non-strategic pick. The cynics would have said “Oh, she only picked Shapiro because she needs Pennsylvania” or “Yeah, yeah, he’s an astronaut, but she wants Arizona”.

    In this case? I think he’s going to be a delight to watch. He’ll devastate Vance in the debate.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      She only picked him because she needs to show that she’s committed to fixing immigration, because he’s from a border state. ;)

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        shield
        M
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Mocking a mod with a line item specifically against the civility guidelines is not a way to win friends and influence people.

        • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Why does it matter that you’re a mod? Oh right it matters because you feel like you have some power to abuse. And I’m not sure why you think I’m trying to do either of those things, I’m not a politician or something.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            shield
            M
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Mocking someone with a “M” next to their name when they can, with no trouble at all, remove your comment is not a good life choice. 2nd warning, temp banned.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a resident of a neighboring state, I’m excited to get to vote for someone from somewhere so close in a national election. If my annecdata happens to apply to more than just me that might help in Iowa, Wisconsin and the Dakotas (although culturally the dakotas are more comparable to their neighbors to the west, while Minnesota is culturally closer to Iowa, Illinois and Wisconsin)

      • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Granted I only married into a Minnesotan family and my experience with the Dakotas is fairly limited, but I would have said that they’re a pretty broad spectrum from east to west, especially in South Dakota. Rapid City is definitely pretty similar to Montana and Wyoming, but Mitchell, Sioux Falls, and Fargo are all far more similar to Minnesota

        Then again, I’m thinking “culturally” not “politically,” so if you’re thinking about how they vote, you’re probably right that they’re likely more similar to MT than MN.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Think of it this way: Minnesota has a population of 5.7M, and almost 3M of that is in the metro area of Minneapolis. It’s not quite up to the level of Chicago or New York, where that one blue metro area completely dominates state politics, but it’s close.

          What I’m getting at is while Minnesota does have areas that are more like the Dakotas, those aren’t the places where most of the people live.

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think he’s pretty strategic, not to any specific state, but to rural Middle America in general. He grew up working on a farm, worked in a factory for a bit, joined the army then worked as a teacher and football coach, he’s the salt of the earth common American vance pretends to be. Not saying he’ll turn all the rural areas blue but even going from say 20% to 25% will help a lot in those swing states which have a large rural population.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, but he’s no salt-of-the-earth type like JD Vance who is a hilbilly* who attended Yale Law and then worked for totally normal guy Peter Thiel at his Venture Capital firm in San Francisco.

        * Not really a hilbilly

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Walzamania is running wild. I checked out his resume and background. He is the best choice and a decent human. Which is rare in these times. I give props where it is due for Dems not fucking up here.

    • mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m sad cause the dude managed to get a ton of shit through with a one vote majority here. He’s a good politician that doesn’t bs too much. Course the right here is as crazy as anywhere, if more democrats in the us were like mn democrats more shit would get done ignoring the cheese and wine coalition.

      • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s a reason why we are a consistently blue voting state in presidential elections. The vast majority aren’t wealthy landowning types. We also have a very educated population. Is it more educated than other states? I don’t know, but we pride ourselves on it.

        I’m gonna miss him as governor, but damn if he doesn’t solidify the ticket.

    • MermaidsGarden@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I had the privilege of hearing him speak to the Kansas Democratic Party earlier this year and was kind of blown away by him. She made the right choice.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Half the pictures I see of him, he reminds me Jeffrey Lebowski (David Huddleston).

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was real worried she was gonna re-saddle her campaign with an anti-Palestine running mate. This is a relief and gives me some hope for this Nov.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Mostly about Gaza. Iirc he was rough on shutting down protests and is pretty pro Israel in general. Not sure if he ever commented on Palestinian civilians directly.

      • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        He has a lot of baggage that has the potential to tank the ticket and stifle the positive trajectory Kamala has going. Part of her momentum is hoping for a better stance on Gaza compared to Biden and Shapiro would be harmful for that image. You can argue some of it isn’t justified, but politics is more emotional than rational and even past that some of his negatives are tough to swallow - like response to protestors, school vouchers, potential cover-up of an aides sexual misconduct…

        It’s just an unnecessarily vulnerable pick.

        • firebyte@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          So assuming Harris and Walz are going to be more difficult for Netanyahu to negotiate with, does this increase chances of a ceasefire in Gaza?

          • acargitz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I would think that it is more likely for Netanyahu to do something desperately stupid before the US election to try to change the conversation. Like start a war with Iran as the October surprise…

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah people were assuming it was him because of the announcement being in Philly when it’s probably just a scheduling question

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I loved this guy since the juxtaposition photos between him and the child labor folks. I wonder if Harris campaign is getting to make decisions because this whole situation blindsided DNC officials/strategists who have historically made stupid calls. They haven’t had 4 years to overthink a campaign.

    As cynical as I am, I think laughing Harris just felt a good feeling about smiling Walz that she just didn’t get from Shapiro, and no strategist hack was able to convince them otherwise.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I suppose this is a good time for me to send that nice donation I’ve been putting off and hope it helps to let the DNC see what happens when they don’t disenfranchise progressives.

    • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      DNC sucks at strategy. I think making quick decisive moves, especially with the public’s diminished attention span is proving very effective. Campaigns should probably focus on being like 3 months before the elections in this era.

      • Scallionsandeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Should Harris win (and especially if she wins big), I could see it changing the nature of campaigning here. Three months goes against all the conventional wisdom.

        The media won’t be happy about it, but it’s past time we bring the press back to public service and away from profiteering anyway.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Harris’s primary campaign seemed to be defined by Harris herself taking progressive-ish positions and then later walking them back after someone in her orbit convinced her she had to be more status quo. Maybe that campaign flaming out has taught her to stop listening to those people.

  • Signtist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    My sister used to be the head of the environmental department of one of the suburbs of Minneapolis. She’s met Tim Walz a few times, and has had nothing but good things to say about both his personality and his attitude toward the environment. The US has pretty slim pickings for good politicians these days, but I really feel that Tim is on that list. I’m feeling hopeful about American politics for the first time since I learned about how American politics works!

    • pingveno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are some people who actively try to make you feel like politics in the US is hopelessly broken and you might as well just give up. There are many, many people who just want to make things better, whether that’s at the federal, state, local, or hyperlocal level. They might disagree on how to do it, and the best ones are the ones that know how to come up with a reasonable compromise when disagreements arise. If you’re interested, always look for opportunities.