How would “restoring” work? Is that legislation, or modifying the supreme court, etc?
Basically legislation. Dobbs just said there wasn’t a constitutional right, but that doesn’t mean there can’t be a federal law that makes that a right. A federal law could effectively restore this right (although it wouldn’t make it a constitutional right, which would be harder to take away).
Rather just restore, improve. It was said Roe is incomplete and should be revisited for better and clearer coverage.
So why hasn’t Biden?
biden’s not running LOL
Kind of tough when Republicans are in charge of the house of representatives.
Last I checked, the house of representatives doesn’t keep him from speaking out and pushing the issue.
In March:
Tonight, President Biden will again call on Congress to restore the protections of Roe v. Wade in federal law so women in every state have the freedom to make deeply personal health care decisions. And the Biden-Harris Administration will continue to take executive action to protect access to reproductive health care, including through ongoing implementation of the President’s three Executive Orders and a Presidential Memorandum issued since the Court overturned Roe v. Wade. To date, the Administration has taken action to:
- Protect access to abortion, including FDA-approved medication abortion;
- Defend access to emergency medical care;
- Support the ability to travel for reproductive health care;
- Strengthen access to high-quality, affordable contraception;
- Safeguard the privacy of patients and health care providers; and
- Ensure access to accurate information and legal resources.
I know you’re a troll, but just in case someone well meaning stumbles across this, Biden has called for this so many times.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/state-of-the-union-2024/
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2024-06-27/trump-biden-abortion-presidential-debate
This took about three minutes to find, all from 2024.
I never made any claim that he wasn’t pushing the issues, but cool. I was merely rebutting the reply above mine.
Maybe don’t defend someone implying that he’s not pushing the issue next time.
Last I checked, being either disingenuous or a moron doesn’t prevent you from using Google to look up whether or not Biden failire in calling for the restoration of roe you’re implying is true.
I mean It’s not like I’m claiming you’re a disingenuousmoron who can’t use Google, right?
Funny how that works
My comment was about restoring Roe and you said there’s nothing stopping him from speaking out about it. Which he is doing. So I’m not really sure what you were rebutting.
I was rebutting the reply saying that The House of Representatives was stopping him from speaking about it…holy crap can you guys not follow a comment thread correctly or something? I’m literally saying the same thing you are, but because some numb-nuts didn’t check the names in the threads and called me a troll I get dogpiled?
You people are what’s wrong with Lemmy.
Don’t worry too much about it. You’re being dogpiled because that’s what lemmy’s centrists do when they encounter someone who isn’t cheering loudly enough for Biden.
If everyone misunderstood you then maybe the problem isn’t with them.
If that is what you were trying to say you expressed yourself poorly. It’s possible to clarify your position without ranting at other people for your mistake.
You might want to try following the thread a little better if that’s what you think is happening here.
I’m the person you originally responded to. I said Biden hasn’t restored Roe because of the house. I though it would be clear from context since he is speaking about it.
Alright, then you strongly implied Biden doesn’t speak out about that. There’s been many people on abortion related threads who falsely say or imply that, and I don’t know any other way someone could reasonably read your comment. It’s still there to place an edit afterwards if you’d like to clarify what you meant exactly.
I didn’t imply anything, the guy I replied to did! And here you are all jumping my ass about it. I don’t need to edit shit; you need to stop jumping to conclusions.
🙄
So why hasn’t Biden?
.
Last I checked, the house of representatives doesn’t keep him from speaking out and pushing the issue.
This you?
I never made any claim that he wasn’t pushing the issues
This too?
Actually NO! That “So why hasn’t Biden” IS NOT ME…
For fucks sake. Can you people get a grip? Read the damn user names.
And the second and third quotes, that were you?
Take the goddamn L, man. You made a statement in ignorance, you were wrong, and you were given evidence showing you were wrong. Accept it, learn from your mistake, and be better in the future.
never made any claim that he wasn’t pushing the issues,
So why hasn’t Biden?
lol
That wasn’t me. The person below that said that Biden wasn’t pushing the issues because of the house of representatives; and I simply said that’s not stopping him…
No.
I said Biden hasn’t restored Roe because of the house of representatives.
To be fair, that was a different person.
No I mean the title implies as though she can restore roe. If she can do it why can’t Biden? Answer is either Biden doesn’t want to or he can’t and it will be the same for Kamala
Another mythical carrot to lure voters to the polls, again. I cant imagine people falling for this lie, again.
“I don’t believe Kamala actually wants to restore Roe v Wade, so I’m going to support the party that took it away in the first place!”
Makes sense to me!
Point to where I said I would vote for the orange rapist?
Misread that as “papist” and was very confused for a second. BRB… need more caffeine.
Papists dont want him either
oh, are we using “number of lies told” as a metric to judge? ok, here
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html
Don’t feed the troll.
Not much for trolls to eat from that link though, bro is murdered
Deflecting and burying your head in the sand doesn’t get rid of the fact that Democrats have promised time and again to protect rights when in reality they’ve weaponized them so they can raise campaign money.
Nobody deflects quite like a right-wing hate-fueled empathy-lacking doublethinker
You are closer in ideology to Republicans than any leftist is to Democrats.
LOL harris will have the biggest inauguration crowd ever
Still deflecting
Not sure if trump supporter, or just a religious zealot…
Removed, see the new civility guidelines in the sidebar.
No idea what I said or how it broke rules now that the comment is gone lol
Your modlog is here: ;)
Sweet thanks
Russian shill/propaganda account are also valid guesses
Removed, see the new civility guidelines in the sidebar.
They’ve only been trying to play that bullshit card for 50 years.
I mean, if the Repiblicans get control, they will absolutely push for a nationwide abortion ban:
The elimination of birth control:
And no-fault divorce (read as “woman initiated divorce”):
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jun/25/republicans-no-fault-divorce
Some have even openly discussed removing womens right to vote:
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/09/21/politics/john-gibbs-womens-suffrage-19th-amendment-kfile
Now, regardless of whether or not the Democratic party would actually PROTECT these things or not is irrelevant. They definitely would not express interest in restrictions the way the Republicans do.
This is why it’s important to vote an all blue ticket. The alternative is literal Christofascism.
Still not voting a blue ticket, theyve had 50 years to fix this shit and ignored women’s rights in order to raise money and stay in power. Theyve held women’s reproductive rights hostage and demand we bail them out everytime an election comes around. They have proven they can’t be trusted
Voting against a blue ticket is counter to what you want though, you will actively make things worse by not ensuring Democrats win.
Even if your theory is correct, the worst case scenario is Democrats maintaining the status quo, a Republican win is Christofascism.
So which do you want? There is no 3rd path available.
Democrats have nothing I want, when they actively participate in the deaths of people around the world while committing social murder over here, they are not deserving of support. Maintaining the status quo is not good enough anymore because the status quo keeps getting progressively worse. Theyve gone from saying Dan Quayle isn’t electable because he misspelled potato to turning a blind eye to a genocide in only 30 years. And they continue to evoke the marginalized as a human shield to protect THEIR interests and privilege.
When the Republican opposition actively advocates for all that, only worse, you very much do have a choice.
I explain it like this… Israel’s policies are clearly war crimes and they have been war crimes since they first blockaded Gaza and illegally invaded Lebanon back in the 90s.
Trump wants to take the worst of those policies and implement them here.
So enabling a Trump victory, by not supporting the Democrats, you’re endorsing those policies here at home.
Democrats constantly rewarding their politicians for bad behavior is what is enabling Trump type policies. Democrats constantly rewarding their politicians for bad behavior is what is enabling the Overton window to keep shifting further to the right. Democrats are their own worst enemy, they help enable the things that they claim to hate. Thereby becoming the things they hate
He knows. These people are looking for any excuse to watch America fall. If that means urging others not to vote in order to see Trump ruin America- so be it.
Politico Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)
Politico is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.
Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/politico/Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News:
- https://ground.news/find?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2F2024%2F07%2F29%2Fkamala-harris-abortion-restoring-roe-00171657
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.Footer
Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.Don’t restore it, make a better law and make it a human right.
you fucking morons
You don’t need to restore Roe.
You need an actual law enshrining it as a right.
I’m not a judge, but I can definitely see why Roe was overturned. So don’t play stupid games, don’t rely on a Court to interpret a certain Law a certain way, just enshrine it in law. Black ink on white paper.
Oh of course, we’ll just go ahead and do that tomorrow! Sheesh, what were we thinking? Thank you so much for your enlightening remarks. It was so obvious this entire time!
Good for Kamala.
Good for America.
I’m not sure this belongs in “politics.” This is a human rights issue.
“The government has no place in making decisions about a pregnant person’s health and body,” said Jenni Villavicencio, an OB-GYN and co-founder of Raven Lab for Reproductive Liberation. “We’re going to be as forceful as we can in making sure our movement is unified in saying that an expansive policy is the only thing we will accept.”
Womens’ reproductive rights need to be codified in federal law. Anything less allows for this nonsense to be repeated. A Harris Administration will be open to this dialogue.
Vote.
